This is a list of the substantive decisions of the Supreme Court of New Zealand. It is organised in order of the date the case was handed down.
2004
edit- Prebble v Huata
- Zaoui v Attorney-General
- Siloata v R
2005
edit- Otago Stations Estates Ltd V Parker
- Timoti v R
- Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd
- Hemmes v Young
- Westfield (New Zealand) Ltd v North Shore City Council
- Morgan v Superintendent, Rimutaka Prison
- Mist v R
- Bharamitash v Kumar
- Trans Otway v Shephard and Dunphy
2006
edit- Thompson v R
- Casata Ltd v General Distributors Ltd
- L v R
- Telecom Mobile Ltd v Commerce Commission
- Peter Portable Sawing Systems Ltd (in liq) v Lucas
- Allen v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
- Felton v Johnson
- Mafart and Prieur v Television New Zealand Ltd
- Eastern Services Ltd v No 68 Ltd
- C v Complaints Assessment Committee
- Condon v R
- Shirley v Wairarapa District Health Board
- Steele and Roberts v Serepisos
- Chirnside v Fay
- Chamberlains v Lai
- Secretary for Justice (as the New Zealand Central Authority on behalf of T J) v H
- Henkel KgaA v Holdfast New Zealand Ltd
- Taylor v Jones
- AMP General Insurance Ltd v Bodkins
- Gilchrist v R
- Waitakere City Council v Estates Homes Ltd
- Walsh v R
- Zaoui v Attorney-General (No 2)
2007
edit- Hansen v R
- Paper Reclaim Ltd v Aotearoa International Ltd
- Trustees Executors Ltd v Murray
- Brooker v Police
- Wholesale Distributors Ltd v Gibbons Holdings Ltd
- Commerce Commission v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd
- Larsen v Rick Dees Ltd
- Maruha Corp and Maruha (NZ) Ltd v Amaltal Corp Ltd
- Jiang v R
- Arbuthnot v Chief Executive of the Department of Work and Income
- Royal New Zealand Foundation of the Blind v Auckland City Council
- Southbourne Investments Ltd v Greenmount Manufacturing Ltd
- Rajamani v R
- Taunoa v Attorney-General
- Unison Networks Ltd v Commerce Commission
- Reid v R
- New Zealand Airline Pilots' Assoc Industrial Union of Workers Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd
- Rogers v Television New Zealand Ltd
- Owen v R
- Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Stichting Lodestar
- Ngan v R
- Lai v Chamberlains
2008
edit- Hayes v R
- Dollars & Sense Finance Ltd v Nathan
- Westpac Banking Corp v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
- Taunoa v Attorney-General
2011
edit2013
edit2014
edit2016
edit2018
edit- New Health New Zealand Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council
2022
edit- Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis v The King[1]
- Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General (the minimum voting age of 18 years is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990)[2]
References
edit- ^ "Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis v The King" (PDF) (Press release). Supreme Court of New Zealand. 7 October 2022. Retrieved 21 November 2022.
- ^ "Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General" (PDF) (Press release). Supreme Court of New Zealand. 21 November 2022. Retrieved 21 November 2022.
- Comprehensive case studies on the official website: http://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/about/supreme/case-summaries/case-summaries-2008