Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined is a collection of essays on pathological science and pseudoscientific methods used in the science of sociology.[1] It was published in 1997 as a collection of responses, from academics in various related fields, to arguments in the book The Bell Curve. The collection argues that The Bell Curve advocates a specific and fallacious view of race and class, despite the authors' claims of neutrality.[2][3]
References
edit- ^ Kincheloe, Joe L.; Steinberg, Shirley R.; Gresson, III, Aaron D., eds. (1997). Measured lies : the bell curve examined (1st St. Martin's Griffin ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0312172282.
- ^ Clark Studer, Susan (1996). "Review of Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined., , , Aaron Gresson, III". The Journal of Negro Education. 65 (3): 392–393. doi:10.2307/2967355. ISSN 0022-2984. JSTOR 2967355. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ Broadfoot, Patricia (1998). "Review of Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined, , , Aaron D. Gresson III". Comparative Education Review. 42 (3): 372–374. doi:10.1086/447515. ISSN 0010-4086. JSTOR 1189168. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
 | This article about an essay or essay collection is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article about a sociology-related book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |