Menzerath's law, also known as the Menzerath–Altmann law (named after Paul Menzerath and Gabriel Altmann), is a linguistic law according to which the increase of the size of a linguistic construct results in a decrease of the size of its constituents, and vice versa.[1][2]
For example, the longer a sentence (measured in terms of the number of clauses), the shorter the clauses (measured in terms of the number of words), or: the longer a word (in syllables or morphs), the shorter the syllables or morphs in sounds.
History
editIn the 19th century, Eduard Sievers observed that vowels in short words are pronounced longer than the same vowels in long words.[3][4]: 122 Menzerath & de Oleza (1928)[5] expanded this observation to state that, as the number of syllables in words increases, the syllables themselves become shorter on average.
From this, the following hypothesis developed:
The larger the whole, the smaller its parts.
In particular, for linguistics:
The larger a linguistic construct, the smaller its constituents.
In the early 1980s, Altmann, Heups,[6] and Köhler[7] demonstrated using quantitative methods that this postulate can also be applied to larger constructs of natural language: the larger the sentence, the smaller the individual clauses, etc. A prerequisite for such relationships is that a relationship between units (here: sentence) and their direct constituents (here: clause) is examined.[8][9][1]: Übersichten
Mathematics
editAccording to Altmann (1980),[8] it can be mathematically stated as:
where:
- is the constituent size (e.g. syllable length);
- is the size of the linguistic construct that is being inspected (e.g. number of syllables per word);
- , , are positive parameters.
The law can be explained by assuming that linguistic segments contain information about their structure (besides the information that needs to be communicated).[7] The assumption that the length of the structure information is independent of the length of the other content of the segment yields the alternative formula that was also successfully empirically tested.[10]
Examples
editLinguistics
editGerlach (1982)[11] checked a German dictionary[12] with about 15,000 entries:
| 1 | 2391 | 4.53 | 4.33 |
| 2 | 6343 | 3.25 | 3.37 |
| 3 | 4989 | 2.93 | 2.91 |
| 4 | 1159 | 2.78 | 2.62 |
| 5 | 112 | 2.65 | 2.42 |
| 6 | 13 | 2.58 | 2.26 |
Where is the number of morphs per word, is the number of words in the dictionary with length ; is the observed average length of morphs (number of phonemes per morph); is the prediction according to where are fited to data. The F-test has .
As another example, the simplest form of Menzerath's law, , holds for the duration of vowels in Hungarian words:[13]
| Word length (syllables per word) | Sound duration (sec/100) using the vowel ā as an example: observed |
Sound duration (sec/100) using the vowel ā as an example: predicted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.2 | 27.64 |
| 2 | 24.2 | 23.18 |
| 3 | 20.9 | 20.91 |
| 4 | 19.0 | 19.43 |
| 5 | 18.2 | 18.36 |
More examples are on the German Wikipedia pages on phoneme duration, syllable duration, word length, clause length, and sentence length.
This law also seems to hold true for at least a subclass of Japanese Kanji characters.[14]
Non-linguistics
editBeyond quantitative linguistics, Menzerath's law can be discussed in any multi-level complex systems. Given three levels, is the number of middle-level units contained in a high-level unit, is the averaged number of low-level units contained in middle-level units, Menzerath's law claims a negative correlation between and .
Menzerath's law is shown to be true for both the base-exon-gene levels in the human genome,[15] and base-chromosome-genome levels in genomes from a collection of species.[16] In addition, Menzerath's law was shown to accurately predict the distribution of protein lengths in terms of amino acid number in the proteome of ten organisms.[17]
Furthermore, studies have shown that the social behavior of baboon groups also corresponds to Menzerath's Law: the larger the entire group, the smaller the subordinate social groups.[1]: 99 ff
In 2016, a research group at the University of Michigan found that the calls of geladas obey Menzerath's law, observing that calls are abbreviated when used in longer sequences.[18][19]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c Gabriel Altmann, Michael H. Schwibbe (1989). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz in informationsverarbeitenden Systemen. Hildesheim/Zürich/New York: Olms. ISBN 3-487-09144-5.
- ^ Luděk Hřebíček (1995). Text Levels. Language Constructs, Constituents and the Menzerath-Altmann Law. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. ISBN 3-88476-179-X.
- ^ Karl-Heinz Best: Eduard Sievers (1850–1932). In: Glottometrics 18, 2009, ISSN 1617-8351, S. 87–91. (PDF Full text).
- ^ Eduard Sievers: Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig 1876.
- ^ Menzerath, Paul, & de Oleza, Joseph M. (1928). Spanische Lautdauer. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Berlin/ Leipzig: de Gruyter.
- ^ Heups, Gabriela. Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Satzlänge zu Clauselänge am Beispiel deutscher Texte verschiedener Textklassen. 1980.
- ^ a b Reinhard Köhler (1984). "Zur Interpretation des Menzerathschen Gesetzes". Glottometrika. 6: 177–183.
- ^ a b Gabriel Altmann (1980). "Prolegomena to Menzerath's law". Glottometrika. 2: 1–10.
- ^ "Hierarchic relations - Laws in Quantitative Linguistics". 2015-12-29. Archived from the original on 2015-12-29. Retrieved 2024-09-24.
- ^ Jiří Milička (2014). "Menzerath's Law: The whole is greater than the sum of its parts". Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 21 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/09296174.2014.882187. S2CID 205625169.
- ^ Rainer Gerlach: Zur Überprüfung des Menzerath'schen Gesetzes im Bereich der Morphologie. In: Werner Lehfeldt, Udo Strauss (eds.): Glottometrika 4. Brockmeyer, Bochum 1982, ISBN 3-88339-250-2, S. 95–102.
- ^ Gerhard Wahrig (ed.): dtv-Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich 1978, ISBN 3-423-03136-0.
- ^ Ernst A. Meyer, Zoltán Gombocz: Zur Phonetik der ungarischen Sprache. Berlings Buchdruckerei, Uppsala 1909, page 20; Karl-Heinz Best: Gesetzmäßigkeiten der Lautdauer. In: Glottotheory 1, 2008, page 6.
- ^ Claudia Prün: Validity of Menzerath-Altmann's Law: Graphic Representation of Language, Information Processing Systems and Synergetic Linguistics. In: Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1, 1994, S. 148–155.
- ^ Wentian Li (2012). "Menzerath's law at the gene-exon level in the human genome". Complexity. 17 (4): 49–53. Bibcode:2012Cmplx..17d..49L. doi:10.1002/cplx.20398.
- ^ Ramon Ferrer-I-Cancho, Núria Forns (2009). "The self-organization of genomes". Complexity. 15 (5): 34–36. doi:10.1002/cplx.20296. hdl:2117/180111.
- ^ Eroglu, S (10 Jan 2014). "Language-like behavior of protein length distribution in proteomes". Complexity. 20 (2): 12–21. Bibcode:2014Cmplx..20b..12E. doi:10.1002/cplx.21498.
- ^ Martin, Cassie. "Gelada monkeys know their linguistic math". Science News. Retrieved 12 August 2024.
- ^ Gustison, Morgan (April 18, 2016). "Gelada vocal sequences follow Menzerath's linguistic law". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (19). doi:10.1073/pnas.1522072113. hdl:2117/89435.