Mesophyletidae is an extinct family of weevils known from a number of genera preserved in Cretaceous amber. The family was first described as a subfamily in the extant family Caridae, and subsequently raised to family status in 2018.

Mesophyletidae
Temporal range: Cenomanian
Mekorhamphus beatae paratype
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Superfamily: Curculionoidea
Family: Mesophyletidae
Poinar, 2008
Subfamilies
  • Aepyceratinae
  • Mesophyletinae
Synonyms
  • Mesophyletinae
  • Mesophyletini

Distribution and paleoecology

edit

The family is known exclusively from fossils preserved in Burmese amber, and combined with the Nemonychidae genera, the Burmese amber fauna is considered one of the richest weevil faunas of the Mesozoic,[1] rivaling Kazakhstan's late Jurassic site at Karatau. The Burmese amber fossils preserve more detail than the compression fossils from Karatau.[1] The amber paleoforest was tropical in temperature, and situated along the tidal boundary of a coastal estuary.[2] The resin from which the amber originated is most likely araucarian, based on both inclusions of wood fragments and spectroscopic analysis.[3]

Based on the elongated rostrum, antennae, and ovipositor structures; species in mesophyletidae were likely specialized herbivores which predated seeds and plant ovules in manners similar to that of the living Anthonomini, Curculionini, and related curculionid tribes. The legs are modified with elongated tarsi sporting large claws and tibia with strengthening ridges and a flattened or flared profile. These adaptations indicate an arboreal life of climbing on smooth or flimsy plant organs such as leaves and fruits.[1] Additionally the elytra did not lock along the tips, and are loose to the pygidium which would allow for quick transition to flight, something the group was likely proficient at. They have enlarged eyes composed of coarse facets protruding on their heads, a feature seen in many weevil groups that spend their lives in dark canopies or in leaf litter.[1]

History and classification

edit

Mesophyletis was the first genus of the group to be described, with its type description being published in 2006. The genus was placed into the family "Eccoptarthridae", an older name sometimes used for Caridae, as one of the genera in the subfamily Mesophyletinae by George Poinar Jr. However, in the 2006 paper, no type genus was specified in the subfamily description and a subsequent paper in 2008 specified Mesophyletis as the type genus. The subfamily Aepyceratinae was proposed in 2017 as a part of the family Nemonychidae based on perceived similarities between Aepyceratus hyperochus and the nemonychids.[1]

The 2018 monograph on Burmese amber weevils expanded the group notably, and raised it to a full family, with two defined subfamilies, Aepyceratinae and Mesophyletinae. An additional five genera were described as part of Aepyceratinae, based on the structuring of the antennae, though the 2018 authors note that there are no other indications that the grouping is monophyletic.[1]

Subfamilies and genera

edit
 
Burmophyletis beloides holotype
 
Rhynchitomimus chalybeus holotype
 
Nugatorhinus chenyangi holotype
 
Nugatorhinus albomaculatus holotype

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e f Dave J. Clarke; Ajay Limaye; Duane D. McKenna; Rolf G. Oberprieler (2018). "The weevil fauna preserved in Burmese amber—snapshot of a unique, extinct lineage (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea)". Diversity. 11 (1): Article 1. doi:10.3390/d11010001.
  2. ^ Yu, T.; Kelly, R.; Mu, L; Ross, A.; Kennedy, J.; Broly, P.; Xia, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Dilcher, D. (2019-06-04). "An ammonite trapped in Burmese amber". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (23): 11345–11350. Bibcode:2019PNAS..11611345Y. doi:10.1073/pnas.1821292116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6561253. PMID 31085633.
  3. ^ Poinar, G.; Lambert, J.B.; Wu, Y. (2007-08-10). "Araucarian source of fossiliferous Burmese amber: Spectroscopic and anatomical evidence". Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1: 449–455.