Monita Chatterjee is an auditory scientist and the Director of the Auditory Prostheses & Perception Laboratory at Boys Town National Research Hospital.[1] She investigates the basic mechanisms underlying auditory processing by cochlear implant listeners.

Monita Chatterjee
Scientific career
FieldsAuditory sciences
InstitutionsBoys Town National Research Hospital
Thesis“Aspects of Frequency and Intensity Coding in the Cochlea” (1994)
Doctoral advisorJozef J. Zwislocki and Robert L. Smith

Biography

edit

Chatterjee did her undergraduate studies in Electrical Engineering at Jadavpur University in Kolkata, India, graduating in 1987. After obtaining her PhD in Neuroscience from Syracuse University in 1994, she spent 10 years, from 1994 to 2004, at the House Ear Institute, first as postdoctoral researcher in the group led by Robert V. Shannon, and then as a scientist. She joined the University of Maryland, College Park, in 2005 as an assistant professor, and was promoted to associate professor in 2009. In 2012, she moved to Omaha, NE, joining the research group at Boys Town National Research Hospital.[2] At Boys Town, Chatterjee leads the APPLab[3] and has served as Director of the Technology Core.[4] She is currently Program Director of the Post-Doctoral Training Grant at Boys Town, funded continuously by NIH for 41 years.

Chatterjee's work has been funded by the National Institutes of Health since 1998. She has served as a member of the Program Committee of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.[5] In 2017, she was elected Fellow of the Acoustical Society of America "For contributions to cochlear implant psychophysics and speech perception."[6]

Chatterjee was a keynote speaker at the 105th convention of the Audio Engineering Society in 1998.[7] She was also a keynote speaker at the 2017 conference of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance (CI2017).[8] She was elected Scientific Chair of the 2013 Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses (CIAP).[9] In 2018 she was an invited Translational Research Speaker at the American Auditory Society's annual meeting.[10] She has served as Associate Editor of Ear & Hearing and American Journal of Audiology, and Frontiers in Aud. Cog. Neurosc. and is currently Associate Editor of the Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology[11] and JASA Express Letters[12]

In 2021, Chatterjee established a network for Black, Indigenous, and other Persons of Color working in the area of Communication Sciences and Disorders at any career level.[13] The primary objective of this grassroots network is to share resources, mentoring, and collaborative interests between members.

Research

edit

Chatterjee has published extensively on the processing and perception of electrical signals by cochlear implant patients.[14] These include studies of channel-interaction,[15][16] amplitude modulation processing,[17] modulation masking/modulation detection interference[18][19] and voice pitch coding, an area of specific deficits in listeners with cochlear implants.[20]

Chatterjee pioneered research on auditory scene analysis in cochlear-implant users.[21] Until this study, the exploration of the auditory stream segregation phenomenon was limited to normal hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners.

Chatterjee's recent work turned to auditory,[22][23][24] affective,[25][26][27] and linguistic development,[28] and has focused on deaf children with cochlear implants. The particularity of this unique population is the extraordinary neuroplasticity they exhibit during the first years of language acquisition following implantation. Chatterjee wondered to what extent their plastic brain could adapt to the relatively poor auditory inputs delivered by implants and overcome their limitations. Despite its remarkable success in restoring hearing to deaf individuals, the cochlear implant is not yet perfect in transmitting a speech signal with as much fidelity as acoustic hearing.[29] Much of Chatterjee’s early work was concerned with those limitations in spectro-temporal resolution, exacerbated by physiological interactions in electric stimulation patterns between multiple channels of the electrode array.[30] Those limitations should be particularly problematic for pitch perception, and she reasoned that cochlear-implanted children must find it especially challenging to recognize intonation within sentences or within words (as in the case of tonal languages) or to perceive emotion in a speaker’s voice. Those difficulties would represent a major obstacle when learning to interact with the primary caregiver, as well as peers, to communicate mood or intent, which has implications all the way to the development of theory of mind and psycho-social constructs.

References

edit
  1. ^ "Monita Chatterjee, Ph.D." Archived from the original on 2018-03-11.
  2. ^ Curriculum vitae, retrieved 2016-07-09.
  3. ^ "Chatterjee Lab website".
  4. ^ "BTNRH Technology Core".
  5. ^ Program Committee, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, retrieved 2018-03-09.
  6. ^ Fellows of the Society, Acoustical Society of America, retrieved 2018-03-09.
  7. ^ 105th AES Convention, Audio Engineering Society, retrieved 2016-07-09.
  8. ^ "15th Symposium on Cochlear Implants in Children Program Book" (PDF). American Cochlear Implant Alliance. 2017. Retrieved 2024-03-15.
  9. ^ "CIAP 2013 Home Page". www.ciaphome.org. Retrieved 2018-06-13.
  10. ^ "AAS 2018 Final Program" (PDF).
  11. ^ "JARO Editorial Board".
  12. ^ "JASA EL Editorial Board".
  13. ^ "BIPOC-CSD network".
  14. ^ Chatterjee, Monita. "Chatterjee publication list". pubmed. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
  15. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (1998). "Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 103 (5): 2565–2572. Bibcode:1998ASAJ..103.2565C. doi:10.1121/1.422777. PMID 9604350.
  16. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (2006). "Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients". Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 7 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1007/s10162-005-0019-2. PMC 2504584. PMID 16270234.
  17. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (2011). "Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 130 (3): 1567–1580. Bibcode:2011ASAJ..130.1567C. doi:10.1121/1.3621445. PMC 3188971. PMID 21895095.
  18. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (2003). "Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 113 (4): 2042–2053. Bibcode:2003ASAJ..113.2042C. doi:10.1121/1.1555613. PMID 12703715.
  19. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (2004). "Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners". Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 5 (4): 360–375. doi:10.1007/s10162-004-4050-5. PMC 2504569. PMID 15675001.
  20. ^ Chatterjee, Monita (2008). "Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition". Hearing Research. 235 (1–2): 143–156. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004. PMC 2237883. PMID 18093766.
  21. ^ Chatterjee, M.; Sarampalis, A.; Oba, S. I. (2006). "Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report". Hearing Research. 222 (1–2): 100–107. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.001. PMC 1820844. PMID 17071032.
  22. ^ Deroche, M.L.D.; Zion, D.J.; Schurman, J.R.; Chatterjee, M. (2012). "Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 131 (4): 2938–2947. Bibcode:2012ASAJ..131.2938D. doi:10.1121/1.3692230. PMC 3339501. PMID 22501071.
  23. ^ Deroche, M.L.D.; Lu, H.-P.; Limb, C.J.; Lin, Y.-S.; Chatterjee, M. (2014). "Deficits in the pitch sensitivity of cochlear-implanted children speaking English or Mandarin". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8: 282. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00282. PMC 4158799. PMID 25249932.
  24. ^ Deroche, M.L.D.; Kulkarni, A.M.; Christensen, J.A.; Limb, C.J.; Chatterjee, M. (2016). "Deficits in the sensitivity to pitch sweeps by school-aged children wearing cochlear implants". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 10: 73. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00073. PMC 4776214. PMID 26973451.
  25. ^ Chatterjee, M.; Zion, D.J.; Deroche, M.L.D.; Burianek, B.A.; Limb, C.J.; Goren, A.P.; Kulkarni, A.M.; Christensen, J.A. (2015). "Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers". Hearing Research. 322: 151–162. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.003. PMC 4615700. PMID 25448167.
  26. ^ Jiam, N.T.; Caldwell, M.; Deroche, M.L.D.; Chatterjee, M.; Limb, C.J. (2017). "Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users". Hearing Research. 352: 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.006. PMC 5937709. PMID 28088500.
  27. ^ Tinnemore, A.R.; Zion, D.J.; Kulkarni, A.M.; Chatterjee, M. (2018). "Children's recognition of emotional prosody in spectrally degraded speech is predicted by their age and cognitive status". Ear and Hearing. 39 (5): 874–880. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000546. PMC 6046271. PMID 29337761.
  28. ^ Peng, S.-C.; Lu, H.-P.; Lu, N.; Lin, Y.-S.; Deroche, M.L.D.; Chatterjee, M. (2017). "Processing of acoustic cues in lexical-tone identification by pediatric cochlear-implant recipients". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 60 (5): 1223–1235. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0048. PMC 5755546. PMID 28388709.
  29. ^ Başkent, D.; Gaudrain, E.; Tamati, T.N.; Wagner, A. (2016). Perception and psychoacoustics of speech in cochlear implant users, in Scientific Foundations of Audiology: Perspectives from Physics, Biology, Modeling, and Medicine, Eds. A.T. Cacace, E. de Kleine, A.G. Holt, and P. van Dijk. San Diego, CA, USA: Plural Publishing, Inc. pp. 285–319.
  30. ^ Chatterjee, M.; Shannon, R.V. (1998). "Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 103 (5): 2565–2572. Bibcode:1998ASAJ..103.2565C. doi:10.1121/1.422777. PMID 9604350.
edit