The multiplier–accelerator model (also known as Hansen–Samuelson model) is a macroeconomic model which analyzes the business cycle.[1] This model was developed by Paul Samuelson, who credited Alvin Hansen for the inspiration.[1][2][3] This model is based on the Keynesian multiplier, which is a consequence of assuming that consumption intentions depend on the level of economic activity, and the accelerator theory of investment, which assumes that investment intentions depend on the pace of growth in economic activity.
Model
editThe multiplier–accelerator model can be stated for a closed economy as follows:[3] First, the market-clearing level of economic activity is defined as that at which production exactly matches the total of government spending intentions, households' consumption intentions and firms' investing intentions.
- ;
then an equation to express the idea that households' consumption intentions depend upon some measure of economic activity, possibly with a lag:
- ;
then an equation that makes firms' investment intentions react to the pace of change of economic activity:
- ;
![{\displaystyle I_{t}=\beta [C_{t}-C_{t-1}]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a98c643585ac597d72cea49af181c9662033e71e)
and finally a statement that government spending intentions are not influenced by any of the other variables in the model. For example, the level of government spending could be used as the unit of account:
where is national income, is government expenditure, is consumption expenditure, is induced private investment, and the subscript is time. Here we can rearrange these equations and rewrite them as a second-order linear difference equation:[3][4][5]
Samuelson demonstrated that there are several kinds of solution path for national income to be derived from this second order linear difference equation.[3][4] This solution path changes its form, depending on the values of the roots of the equation or the relationships between the parameter and .[3][4]
Criticism
editJay Wright Forrester argues[6] that the Accelerator-Multiplier Theory cannot create the assumed business cycle but instead is a major contributor to the economic long wave.
References
edit- ^ a b Edward E. Leamer (2008). Macroeconomic Patterns and Stories. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 158. ISBN 9783540463894.
- ^ Samuelson, P.A. (1939). "Interactions Between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration". Review of Economic Statistics. 21 (2): 75–78. doi:10.2307/1927758. JSTOR 1927758.
- ^ a b c d e A. W. Mullineux (1984). The Business Cycle After Keynes: A Contemporary Analysis. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 11. ISBN 9780389204534.
- ^ a b c Goldberg, Samuel (1958). Introduction to Difference Equations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 153–56.
- ^ Gandolfo, Giancarlo (1996). "Second-order Difference Equations in Economic Models". Economic Dynamics (Third ed.). Berlin: Springer. pp. 71–81. ISBN 9783540627609.
- ^ Jay W. Forrester (2003). "Economic theory for the new millennium". doi:10.1002/sdr.1490.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
Further reading
edit- Bratt, E. C. (1961). "Multiplier-Accelerator Models". Business Cycles and Forecasting (Fifth ed.). Homewood: Irwin. pp. 188–211.
- Estey, J. A. (1956). "The Multiplier-Accelerator Interaction". Business Cycles: Their Nature, Cause, and Control (Third ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. pp. 275–287.
- Fellner, W. J. (1956). Trends and Cycles in Economic Activity. New York: Henry Holt. pp. 308–338.