The omega constant is a mathematical constant defined as the unique real number that satisfies the equation

It is the value of W(1), where W is Lambert's W function. The name is derived from the alternate name for Lambert's W function, the omega function. The numerical value of Ω is given by

Ω = 0.567143290409783872999968662210... (sequence A030178 in the OEIS).
1/Ω = 1.763222834351896710225201776951... (sequence A030797 in the OEIS).

Properties

edit

Fixed point representation

edit

The defining identity can be expressed, for example, as

 

or

 

as well as

 

Computation

edit

One can calculate Ω iteratively, by starting with an initial guess Ω0, and considering the sequence

 

This sequence will converge to Ω as n approaches infinity. This is because Ω is an attractive fixed point of the function ex.

It is much more efficient to use the iteration

 

because the function

 

in addition to having the same fixed point, also has a derivative that vanishes there. This guarantees quadratic convergence; that is, the number of correct digits is roughly doubled with each iteration.

Using Halley's method, Ω can be approximated with cubic convergence (the number of correct digits is roughly tripled with each iteration): (see also Lambert W function § Numerical evaluation).

 

Integral representations

edit

An identity due to [citation needed]Victor Adamchik[citation needed] is given by the relationship

 

Other relations due to Mező[1][2] and Kalugin-Jeffrey-Corless[3] are:

 
 

The latter two identities can be extended to other values of the W function (see also Lambert W function § Representations).

Transcendence

edit

The constant Ω is transcendental. This can be seen as a direct consequence of the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem. For a contradiction, suppose that Ω is algebraic. By the theorem, e−Ω is transcendental, but Ω = e−Ω, which is a contradiction. Therefore, it must be transcendental.[4]

References

edit
  1. ^ Mező, István. "An integral representation for the principal branch of the Lambert W function". Retrieved 24 April 2022.
  2. ^ Mező, István (2020). "An integral representation for the Lambert W function". arXiv:2012.02480 [math.CA]..
  3. ^ Kalugin, German A.; Jeffrey, David J.; Corless, Robert M. (2011). "Stieltjes, Poisson and other integral representations for functions of Lambert W". arXiv:1103.5640 [math.CV]..
  4. ^ Mező, István; Baricz, Árpád (November 2017). "On the Generalization of the Lambert W Function" (PDF). Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 369 (11): 7928. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
edit