North Lincolnshire (UK Parliament constituency)
North Lincolnshire, formally known as the Northern Division of Lincolnshire or as Parts of Lindsey, was a county constituency in the Lindsey district of Lincolnshire. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
North Lincolnshire | |
---|---|
Former county constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Lincolnshire |
1832–1885 | |
Seats | Two |
Created from | Lincolnshire |
Replaced by | Brigg Gainsborough Louth |
History
editThe constituency was created by the Reform Act 1832 for the 1832 general election, and abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 for the 1885 general election. It was then split into six new single-seat constituencies: Brigg, Gainsborough, Horncastle, Louth, Sleaford, Spalding and Stamford
Boundaries
edit1832–1868: The Parts of Lindsey[1] (see Parts of Lincolnshire).
1868–1885: The Wapentakes, Hundreds, or Sokes of Manley, Yarborough, Bradley Haverstoe, Ludborough, Walshcroft, Aslacoe, Corringham, Louth Eske, and Calceworth, so much as lies within Louth Eske.[2]
Members of Parliament
editElection results
editElections in the 1830s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Anderson-Pelham | 6,561 | 42.7 | ||
Radical | William Amcotts-Ingilby | 4,751 | 30.9 | ||
Tory | Sir Robert Sheffield, 4th Baronet | 4,056 | 26.4 | ||
Turnout | 8,338 | 91.3 | |||
Registered electors | 9,134 | ||||
Majority | 1,810 | 11.8 | |||
Whig win (new seat) | |||||
Majority | 695 | 4.5 | |||
Radical win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Anderson-Pelham | 4,489 | 34.7 | −8.0 | |
Conservative | Thomas Corbett | 4,450 | 34.4 | +8.0 | |
Radical | William Amcotts-Ingilby | 3,984 | 30.8 | −0.1 | |
Turnout | 7,827 | 88.2 | −3.1 | ||
Registered electors | 8,872 | ||||
Majority | 39 | 0.3 | −11.5 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −8.0 | |||
Majority | 466 | 3.6 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Radical | Swing | +8.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Anderson-Pelham | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Robert Christopher | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 10,063 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Anderson-Pelham | 5,401 | 39.3 | N/A | |
Conservative | Robert Christopher | 4,522 | 32.9 | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles Cust[11] | 3,819 | 27.8 | N/A | |
Majority | 879 | 6.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,871 (est) | 66.8 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,280 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Anderson-Pelham succeeded to the peerage, becoming 2nd Earl of Yarborough and causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Sir Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Sir Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Robert Christopher | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 11,424 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
editChristopher was appointed Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Christopher | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Christopher | 5,585 | 35.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | James Stanhope | 5,579 | 35.0 | N/A | |
Whig | Montague Cholmeley | 4,777 | 30.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 802 | 5.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 10,359 (est) | 88.7 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 11,677 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Stanhope | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 12,435 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Stanhope | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 12,401 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | James Stanhope | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 12,372 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Montague Cholmeley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Rowland Winn | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 9,436 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1870s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Dugdale Astley | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Rowland Winn | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 10,117 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | |||||
Conservative hold |
Winn was appointed a Lord Commissioner of the Treasury, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rowland Winn | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1880s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Laycock | 4,159 | 34.7 | New | |
Conservative | Rowland Winn | 3,949 | 33.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Dugdale Astley | 3,865 | 32.3 | N/A | |
Majority | 294 | 2.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 8,066 (est) | 75.8 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 10,639 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Laycock's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | James Lowther | 4,200 | 53.0 | −12.3 | |
Liberal | George Tomline | 3,729 | 47.0 | +12.3 | |
Majority | 471 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,929 | 71.7 | −4.1 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 11,061 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | −12.3 |
Winn was elevated to the peerage, becoming Lord St Oswald, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Atkinson | 4,052 | 58.5 | −6.8 | |
Liberal | Henry Meysey-Thompson | 2,872 | 41.5 | +6.8 | |
Majority | 1,180 | 17.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,924 | 66.4 | −9.4 | ||
Registered electors | 10,435 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −6.8 |
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (December 2017) |
Notes
edit- ^ "The statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. 2 & 3 William IV. Cap. XLV: An Act to amend the Representation of the People in England and Wales". London: His Majesty's statute and law printers. 1832. pp. 154–206. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- ^ "Representation of the People Act 1867" (PDF). Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- ^ Styled Lord Worsley from 1837.
- ^ a b c d Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. p. 195. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- ^ Mosse, Richard Bartholomew (1836). The Parliamentary Guide: a concise history of the Members of both Houses, etc. p. 140. Retrieved 17 May 2019 – via Google Books.
- ^ Harratt, Simon; Salmon, Philip (2009). "AMCOTTS INGILBY (formerly INGILBY), Sir William, 2nd bt. (1783–1854), of Kettlethorpe, Lincs. and Ripley Castle, Yorks". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- ^ Barlow, Nigel (26 April 2015). "A timely acquisition with a Sam Cam connection at the Working Class Movement Library". About Manchester. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- ^ a b "North Lincolnshire Election". Bath Chronicle and Weekly Gazette. 14 January 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b "Elections". Aberdeen Press & Journal. 20 January 1847. p. 8. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. p. 421. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ "North Lincolnshire". Leeds Intelligencer. 26 June 1841. p. 8. Retrieved 17 May 2019 – via British Newspaper Archive.