Wikipedia

Pauline Kael

Pauline Kael (/keɪl/; June 19, 1919 – September 3, 2001) was an American film critic who wrote for The New Yorker from 1968 to 1991. Known for her "witty, biting, highly opinionated and sharply focused" reviews,[2] Kael often defied the consensus of her contemporaries.

Pauline Kael
Author portrait of Kael from the dust jacket of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (1968)
Author portrait of Kael from the dust jacket of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (1968)
Born(1919-06-19)June 19, 1919
Petaluma, California, U.S.
DiedSeptember 3, 2001(2001-09-03) (aged 82)
Great Barrington, Massachusetts, U.S.
OccupationFilm critic
Alma materUniversity of California, Berkeley
Period1951–1991
Spouse
Edward Landberg
​
​
(m. 1955; div. 1959)​
[1]
Children1

One of the most influential American film critics of her era,[3] she left a lasting impression on the art form. Roger Ebert argued in an obituary that Kael "had a more positive influence on the climate for film in America than any other single person over the last three decades". Kael, he said, "had no theory, no rules, no guidelines, no objective standards. You couldn't apply her 'approach' to a film. With her it was all personal."[4] In a blurb for The Age of Movies, a collection of her writings for the Library of America, Ebert wrote that "Like George Bernard Shaw, she wrote reviews that will be read for their style, humor and energy long after some of their subjects have been forgotten."[5] Owen Gleiberman said she "was more than a great critic. She reinvented the form, and pioneered an entire aesthetic of writing."

Early life and education

edit

Kael was born to Isaac Paul Kael and Judith Kael (née Friedman), Jewish immigrants from Poland, on a chicken farm among other Jewish chicken farmers,[6][7] in Petaluma, California. Her siblings were Louis (1906),[8] Philip (1909),[8] Annie (1912),[8] and Rose (1913).[8][9] Her parents lost their farm when Kael was eight, and the family moved to San Francisco,[3] where Kael attended Girls High School.[10] In 1936 she matriculated at the University of California, Berkeley, where she studied philosophy, literature, and art. She dropped out in 1940. Kael had intended to go to law school, but fell in with a group of artists[11] and moved to New York City with the poet Robert Horan.

Three years later, Kael returned to Berkeley and "led a bohemian life", writing plays and working in experimental film.[3] In 1948, she and the filmmaker James Broughton had a daughter, Gina James, whom Kael raised alone.[12] Gina had a congenital heart defect through much of her childhood,[13] which Kael could not afford the surgery to correct.[14] To support her daughter and herself, Kael worked a series of menial jobs such as cook and seamstress, along with stints as an advertising copywriter.[15][13]

Early career

edit

In 1952, Peter D. Martin,[13] the editor of City Lights magazine, overheard Kael arguing about films in a coffeeshop with a friend and asked her to review Charlie Chaplin's Limelight.[3] Kael dubbed the film "Slimelight" and began publishing film criticism regularly in magazines.

Kael later said of her writing: "I worked to loosen my style—to get away from the term-paper pomposity that we learn at college. I wanted the sentences to breathe, to have the sound of a human voice."[16] She disparaged the supposed critic's ideal of objectivity, calling it "saphead objectivity",[17] and incorporated aspects of autobiography into her criticism.[15] In a review of Vittorio De Sica's 1946 film Shoeshine that has been ranked among her most memorable,[18] Kael described seeing the film

after one of those terrible lovers' quarrels that leave one in a state of incomprehensible despair. I came out of the theater, tears streaming, and overheard the petulant voice of a college girl complaining to her boyfriend, "Well I don't see what was so special about that movie." I walked up the street, crying blindly, no longer certain whether my tears were for the tragedy on the screen, the hopelessness I felt for myself, or the alienation I felt from those who could not experience the radiance of Shoeshine. For if people cannot feel Shoeshine, what can they feel? ... Later I learned that the man with whom I had quarreled had gone the same night and had also emerged in tears. Yet our tears for each other, and for Shoeshine, did not bring us together. Life, as Shoeshine demonstrates, is too complex for facile endings.[18]

Kael broadcast many of her early reviews on Berkeley's alternative public radio station KPFA, and in 1955 she married Edward Landberg, the owner of the Berkeley Cinema-Guild and Studio.[1][19][20] Their marriage soon ended in divorce, but he agreed to pay for Gina's heart surgery, and made Kael the manager of the cinema in 1955, a position she held until 1960.[13][21] In that role, she programmed the films at the two-screen facility, "unapologetically repeat[ing] her favorites until they also became audience favorites".[22] She also wrote "pungent" capsule reviews of the films, which her patrons began collecting.[23]

Going mass-market

edit

Kael continued to juggle writing with other work until she received an offer to publish a book of her criticism. Published in 1965 as I Lost It at the Movies, the collection was a surprise bestseller, selling 150,000 paperback copies. Coinciding with a job at the high-circulation women's magazine McCall's, Kael (as Newsweek put it in a 1966 profile) "went mass".[24]

That same year, Kael wrote a blistering review of The Sound of Music in McCall's. After mentioning that some of the press had dubbed it "The Sound of Money", she called the film's message a "sugarcoated lie that people seem to want to eat".[25] According to legend,[15] this review got her fired from McCall's (The New York Times said as much in Kael's obituary), but Kael and the magazine's editor, Robert Stein, denied this. According to Stein, he fired her "months later, after she kept panning every commercial movie from Lawrence of Arabia and Dr. Zhivago to The Pawnbroker and A Hard Day's Night."[26]

Kael's dismissal from McCall's led to a stint from 1966 to 1967 at The New Republic, whose editors continually altered her writing without her permission. In October 1967, Kael wrote a long essay on Bonnie and Clyde that the magazine declined to publish.[27] William Shawn of The New Yorker obtained the piece and ran it in the New Yorker issue of October 21.[13][28][29] Kael's rave review was at odds with prevailing opinion, which was that the film was inconsistent, blending comedy and violence.[30] According to critic David Thomson, "she was right about a film that had bewildered many other critics."[23] A few months after the essay ran, Kael quit The New Republic "in despair".[31] In 1968, Shawn asked her to join The New Yorker staff; she alternated as film critic every six months with Penelope Gilliatt until 1979, and became the sole critic in 1980 after a year's leave of absence working in the film industry.[3]

The New Yorker tenure

edit

Initially, many considered Kael's colloquial, brash writing style an odd fit with the sophisticated and genteel New Yorker. Kael remembered "getting a letter from an eminent The New Yorker writer suggesting that I was trampling through the pages of the magazine with cowboy boots covered with dung".[32] During her tenure at The New Yorker, she took advantage of a forum that permitted her to write at length—and with minimal editorial interference—thereby achieving her greatest prominence. By 1968, Time magazine called her "one of the country's top movie critics".[33]

In 1970, Kael received a George Polk Award for her work as a critic at The New Yorker. She continued to publish collections of her writing with suggestive titles such as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, When the Lights Go Down, and Taking It All In. Her fourth collection, Deeper into Movies (1973), won the U.S. National Book Award in the Arts and Letters category.[34] It was the first nonfiction book about film to win a National Book Award.

Kael also wrote philosophical essays on movie-going, the modern Hollywood film industry, and what she saw as the lack of courage on the part of audiences to explore lesser-known, more challenging movies (she rarely used the word "film" because she felt it was too elitist). Among her more popular essays were a damning 1973 review of Norman Mailer's semi-fictional Marilyn: a Biography (an account of Marilyn Monroe's life);[35] an incisive 1975 look at Cary Grant's career;[36] and "Raising Kane" (1971), a book-length essay on the authorship of the film Citizen Kane that was the longest piece of sustained writing she had yet done.[37]

Commissioned as an introduction to the shooting script in The Citizen Kane Book, "Raising Kane" was first printed in two consecutive issues of The New Yorker.[38][39] The essay extended Kael's dispute of the auteur theory,[17] arguing that Herman J. Mankiewicz, the screenplay's coauthor, was virtually its sole author and the film's actual guiding force.[8] Kael further alleged that Orson Welles had schemed to deprive Mankiewicz of screen credit.[40]: 494  Welles considered suing Kael for libel.[17] He was defended by critics, scholars and friends, including Peter Bogdanovich, who rebutted Kael's claims in a 1972 article[41] that included the revelation that Kael had appropriated the extensive research of a UCLA faculty member without crediting him.[8]: 157–161 [42][43]

Woody Allen said of Kael: "She has everything that a great critic needs except judgment. And I don't mean that facetiously. She has great passion, terrific wit, wonderful writing style, huge knowledge of film history, but too often what she chooses to extol or fails to see is very surprising."[44]

Kael battled the editors of the New Yorker as much as her own critics.[45] She fought with Shawn to review the 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat, eventually relenting.[46] According to Kael, after reading her unfavorable review of Terrence Malick's 1973 film Badlands, Shawn said, "I guess you didn't know that Terry is like a son to me." Kael responded, "Tough shit, Bill", and her review was printed unchanged.[47] Other than sporadic confrontations with Shawn, Kael said she did most of her work at home, writing.[48]

Upon the release of Kael's 1980 collection When the Lights Go Down, her New Yorker colleague Renata Adler published an 8,000-word review in The New York Review of Books that dismissed the book as "jarringly, piece by piece, line by line, and without interruption, worthless."[49] Adler argued that Kael's post-1960s work contained "nothing certainly of intelligence or sensibility" and faulted her "quirks [and] mannerisms", including repeated use of "bullying" imperatives and rhetorical questions. The piece quickly became infamous in literary circles,[48] described by Time magazine as "the New York literary Mafia['s] bloodiest case of assault and battery in years."[50] Kael did not respond to it, but Adler's review became known as "the most sensational attempt on Kael's reputation".[51]

In 1979, Kael accepted an offer from Warren Beatty to be a consultant to Paramount Pictures, but left the position after only a few months to return to writing criticism.[52]

Later years

edit

In the early 1980s, Kael was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, which sometimes has a cognitive component. As her condition worsened, she became increasingly depressed about the state of American films, along with feeling that "I had nothing new to say".[47] In a March 11, 1991, announcement that The New York Times called "earth-shattering", Kael announced her retirement from reviewing films regularly.[53] She said she would still write essays for The New Yorker and "reflections and other pieces of writing about movies",[53] but over the next 10 years, she published no new work except an introduction to her 1994 compendium For Keeps. In the introduction (which was reprinted in The New Yorker), Kael wrote: "I'm frequently asked why I don't write my memoirs. I think I have".[54]

Though she published nothing new, Kael was not averse to giving interviews, occasionally giving her opinion on new films and television shows. In a 1998 interview with Modern Maturity, she said she sometimes regretted not being able to review: "A few years ago, when I saw Vanya on 42nd Street, I wanted to blow trumpets. Your trumpets are gone once you've quit."[47] She died at her home in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, on September 3, 2001, at the age of 82.[3]

Opinions

edit

Kael's opinions often ran contrary to her fellow critics'. Occasionally, she championed films considered critical failures, such as The Warriors and Last Tango in Paris.[55] She was not especially cruel to some films that many critics deplored—such as the 1972 Man of La Mancha (she praised Sophia Loren's performance). She panned some films that had widespread critical admiration, such as Network,[56] A Woman Under the Influence ("murky, ragmop"),[57] The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner,[58] most experimental cinema[59] (calling it "a creature of publicity and mutual congratulations on artistry"), most student films ("freshmen compositions"),[60] It's a Wonderful Life, Shoah[61] ("logy and exhausting"),[62] Dances with Wolves ("a nature boy movie"),[63] and 2001: A Space Odyssey ("monumentally unimaginative"). Her opinions' originality and the forceful way she expressed them won her ardent supporters and angry detractors.[64]

Kael's reviews included a pan of West Side Story (1961) that drew harsh replies from its fans; ecstatic reviews of Z and MASH that enormously boosted their popularity; and enthusiastic appraisals of Brian De Palma's early films. Her "preview" of Robert Altman's film Nashville appeared in print several months before the film was completed, in an attempt to prevent the studio from recutting the film and to catapult it to box-office success.

Kael was an opponent of the auteur theory, criticizing it both in her reviews and in interviews. She preferred to analyze films without thinking about the director's other works. Andrew Sarris, a key proponent of the theory, debated it with Kael in the pages of The New Yorker and various film magazines.[65][66] Kael argued that a film should be considered a collaborative effort. In "Raising Kane", she argues that Citizen Kane relies extensively on the distinctive talents of Mankiewicz and cinematographer Gregg Toland.[67]

Views on violence

edit

Kael had a taste for antihero films that violate taboos involving sex and violence; this reportedly alienated some of her readers. But she panned Midnight Cowboy (1969), the X-rated antihero film that won an Oscar for Best Picture. She also strongly disliked films she felt were manipulative or appealed in superficial ways to conventional attitudes and feelings. She was particularly critical of Clint Eastwood: her reviews of his films and acting were resoundingly unfavorable, and she became known as his nemesis.[68]

Kael was an enthusiastic, if occasionally ambivalent, supporter of Sam Peckinpah and Walter Hill's early work, both of whom specialized in violent action dramas. Her collection 5001 Nights at the Movies includes favorable reviews of nearly all of Peckinpah's films except The Getaway (1972), as well as Hill's Hard Times (1975), The Warriors (1979), and Southern Comfort (1981). Despite her initial dismissal of John Boorman's Point Blank (1967) for what she felt was its pointless brutality, she later called it "intermittently dazzling" with "more energy and invention than Boorman seems to know what to do with ... one comes out exhilarated but bewildered".[69]

But Kael reacted badly to some action films she felt pushed what she called "right-wing" or "fascist" agendas. She called Don Siegel's Dirty Harry (1971), starring Eastwood, a "right-wing fantasy", "a remarkably single-minded attack on liberal values",[69] and "fascist medievalism".[70] In an otherwise extremely favorable review of Peckinpah's Straw Dogs, Kael concluded that Peckinpah had made "the first American film that is a fascist work of art".[70]

In her review of Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange (1971), Kael wrote that she felt some directors who used brutal imagery were desensitizing audiences to violence:[71]

At the movies, we are gradually being conditioned to accept violence as a sensual pleasure. The directors used to say they were showing us its real face and how ugly it was in order to sensitize us to its horrors. You don't have to be very keen to see that they are now in fact de-sensitizing us. They are saying that everyone is brutal, and the heroes must be as brutal as the villains or they turn into fools. There seems to be an assumption that if you're offended by movie brutality, you are somehow playing into the hands of the people who want censorship. But this would deny those of us who don't believe in censorship the use of the only counterbalance: the freedom of the press to say that there's anything conceivably damaging in these films—the freedom to analyze their implications. If we don't use this critical freedom, we are implicitly saying that no brutality is too much for us—that only squares and people who believe in censorship are concerned with brutality.

Accusations of homophobia

edit

In his preface to a 1983 interview with Kael for the gay magazine Mandate, Sam Staggs wrote: "she has always carried on a love/hate affair with her gay legions. ... like the bitchiest queen in gay mythology, she has a sharp remark about everything".[72] But in the early 1980s, largely in response to her review of the 1981 drama Rich and Famous, Kael faced notable accusations of homophobia. First remarked upon by Stuart Byron in The Village Voice, according to gay writer Craig Seligman, the accusations eventually "took on a life of their own and did real damage to her reputation".[73]

In her review, Kael called the straight-themed Rich and Famous "more like a homosexual fantasy", saying that one female character's "affairs, with their masochistic overtones, are creepy, because they don't seem like what a woman would get into".[74] Byron, who "hit the ceiling" after reading the review, was joined by The Celluloid Closet author Vito Russo, who argued that Kael equated promiscuity with homosexuality, "as though straight women have never been promiscuous or been given the permission to be promiscuous".[74]

In response to her review of Rich and Famous, several critics reappraised Kael's earlier reviews of gay-themed films, including a wisecrack Kael made about the gay-themed The Children's Hour: "I always thought this was why lesbians needed sympathy—that there isn't much they can do."[75] Seligman has defended Kael, saying that these remarks showed "enough ease with the topic to be able to crack jokes—in a dark period when other reviewers ... 'felt that if homosexuality were not a crime it would spread.'"[76] Kael rejected the accusations as "craziness", adding, "I don't see how anybody who took the trouble to check out what I've actually written about movies with homosexual elements in them could believe that stuff."[77]

Nixon quote

edit
See also: False consensus effect

In December 1972, a month after U.S. President Richard Nixon was reelected in a landslide, Kael gave a lecture at the Modern Language Association during which she said: "I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they [Nixon's other supporters] are I don't know. They're outside my ken. But sometimes when I'm in a theater I can feel them." A New York Times article about the lecture quoted this.[78][79]

Kael was subsequently misquoted as having said, "I can't believe Nixon won. I don't know anyone who voted for him" or something that similarly expressed surprise at the election result.[80] This misquotation became an urban legend, and has been cited by conservatives (such as Bernard Goldberg, in his 2001 book Bias) as an example of insularity among the liberal elite.[81][82] The misquotation has also been attributed to other writers, such as Joan Didion.[83]

Influence

edit

As soon as she began writing for The New Yorker, Kael greatly influenced her fellow critics. In the early 1970s, Cinerama distributors "initiate[d] a policy of individual screenings for each critic because her remarks [during the film] were affecting her fellow critics".[84] In the 1970s and 1980s, Kael cultivated friendships with a group of young, mostly male critics, some of whom emulated her distinctive writing style. Referred to derisively as the "Paulettes", they dominated national film criticism in the 1990s. Critics who have acknowledged Kael's influence include, among many others, A. O. Scott of The New York Times,[85] David Denby and Anthony Lane of The New Yorker,[86][87] David Edelstein of New York Magazine,[88] Greil Marcus,[88] Elvis Mitchell,[89] Michael Sragow,[88] Armond White,[90] and Stephanie Zacharek of Salon.[91] It was repeatedly alleged that, after her retirement, Kael's "most ardent devotees deliberate[d] with each other [to] forge a common School of Pauline position" before their reviews were written.[92] When confronted by the rumor that she ran "a conspiratorial network of young critics", Kael said she believed that critics imitated her style rather than her opinions, saying, "A number of critics take phrases and attitudes from me, and those takings stick out—they're not integral to the writer's temperament or approach".[93]

Asked in 1998 whether she thought her criticism had affected the way films were made, Kael deflected the question, saying, "If I say yes, I'm an egotist, and if I say no, I've wasted my life".[47] Several directors' careers were profoundly affected by her, most notably that of Taxi Driver screenwriter Paul Schrader, who was accepted at UCLA Film School's graduate program on Kael's recommendation. Under her mentorship, Schrader worked as a film critic before taking up screenwriting and directing full time. Derek Malcolm, who worked for several decades as a film critic for The Guardian, said: "If a director was praised by Kael, he or she was generally allowed to work, since the money-men knew there would be similar approbation across a wide field of publications".[17] Alternately, Kael was said to have had the power to prevent filmmakers from working; David Lean said that her criticism of his work "kept him from making a movie for 14 years"[94] (referring to the 14-year break between Ryan's Daughter in 1970 and A Passage to India in 1984).

In 1978, Kael received the Women in Film Crystal Award for outstanding women who, through their endurance and the excellence of their work, have helped to expand the role of women in the entertainment industry.[95] In his 1998 film Willow, George Lucas named one of the villains "General Kael" after her. Kael had often reviewed Lucas's work unenthusiastically; in her review of Willow, she called the character an "hommage à moi".[96]

Though he began directing films after she retired, Quentin Tarantino was also influenced by Kael. He read her criticism voraciously while growing up and said that Kael was "as influential as any director was in helping me develop my aesthetic".[54] Wes Anderson recounted his efforts to screen his film Rushmore for Kael in a 1999 The New York Times article titled "My Private Screening With Pauline Kael".[97] He later wrote to Kael, saying: "[Y]our thoughts and writing about the movies [have] been a very important source of inspiration for me and my movies, and I hope you don't regret that".[98] In 1997, cultural critic Camille Paglia said Kael was her second-favorite critic (behind Parker Tyler), criticizing Kael's commentary on such films as La Dolce Vita and Last Year at Marienbad but also calling her "unfailingly perceptive [...] [her] tart, lively, colloquial style I thought exactly right for a mass form like the movies."[99]

In January 2000, filmmaker Michael Moore posted a recollection of Kael's response[100] to his 1989 documentary film Roger & Me. Moore wrote that Kael was incensed that she had to watch Roger & Me in a cinema after Moore refused to send her a tape for her to watch at home, and she resented Roger & Me winning Best Documentary at the 55th New York Film Critics Circle Awards. Moore said:

two weeks later, she wrote a nasty, mean review of my film in The New Yorker. It was OK with me that she didn't like the film, and it didn't bother me that she didn't like the point I was making, or even how I was making it. What was so incredibly appalling and shocking is how she printed outright lies about my movie. I had never experienced such a brazen, bald-faced barrage of disinformation. She tried to rewrite history.... Her complete fabrication of the facts was so weird, so out there, so obviously made-up, that my first response was this must be a humor piece she had written.... But, of course, she wasn't writing comedy. She was a deadly serious historical revisionist.[101]

Kael's career is discussed at length in the 2009 documentary For the Love of Movies by critics whose careers she helped shape, such as Owen Gleiberman and Elvis Mitchell, as well as by those who fought with her, such as Andrew Sarris. The film also shows several of Kael's appearances on PBS, including one alongside Woody Allen. In 2011, Brian Kellow published a biography of Kael, A Life in the Dark.

Rob Garver's documentary What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael was released in 2018. With Sarah Jessica Parker narrating for Kael, the film is a portrait of Kael's work and her influence on the male-dominated worlds of cinema and film criticism.[102]

In a 2024 interview, director Ridley Scott revealed that Kael's harsh critique of his 1982 film Blade Runner made him question the value of such reviews, and stated he never read any other reviews of his films after that.[103]

Awards

edit

Bibliography

edit

Books

edit
 
The Citizen Kane Book (1971)
  • I Lost It at the Movies (1965)
  • Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (1968) ISBN 0-316-48163-7
  • Going Steady (1969) ISBN 0-553-05880-0
  • The Citizen Kane Book (1971)[37] OCLC 209252
  • Deeper into Movies (1973) ISBN 0-7145-0941-8
  • Reeling (1976)
  • When the Lights Go Down (1980) ISBN 0-03-042511-5
  • 5001 Nights at the Movies (1982, revised in 1984 and 1991) ISBN 0-8050-1367-9
  • Taking It All In (1984) ISBN 0-03-069362-4
  • State of the Art (1985) ISBN 0-7145-2869-2
  • Hooked (1989)
  • Movie Love (1991)
  • For Keeps (1994)
  • Raising Kane, and other essays (1996)

Reviews and essays

edit

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "Former Wife Sues Cinema Guild Boss". Oakland Tribune. May 25, 1961. p. 14E – via Newspapers.com. The Landbergs, who were married in El Cerrito on Jan. 23, 1955 and separated Jan. 15, 1958, were divorced and she won a final decree April 7, 1959.
  2. ^ "Pauline Kael". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on June 21, 2006. Retrieved September 1, 2006.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Van Gelder, Lawrence (September 4, 2001). "Pauline Kael, Provocative and Widely Imitated New Yorker Film Critic, Dies at 82". The New York Times. p. C12. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
  4. ^ Ebert, Roger (October 22, 2011). "Knocked up at the movies". Retrieved March 2, 2017.
  5. ^ "The Age of Movies: Selected Writings of Pauline Kael (paperback) | Library of America". www.loa.org. Retrieved March 8, 2023.
  6. ^ McCarthy, Todd (October 27, 2011). "Pauline Kael Biographer: Why Writing About the Legendary Film Critic Was a 'Tremendous Challenge' (Q&A)". The Hollywood Reporter. I went to Petaluma, Calif., and learned a great deal about the community of Jewish chicken ranchers in which she grew up. I was also very lucky: I found her ex-husband, Edward Landberg, who was still living in Berkeley. He was her only husband, although she liked to confuse people by telling them she had been married three times.
  7. ^ Fishkoff, Sue (May 7, 1999). "When left-wingers and chicken wings populated Petaluma". J. The Jewish News of Northern California. J. Wire Services
  8. ^ a b c d e f Kellow, Brian (2011). Pauline Kael : a life in the dark. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-02312-7. OCLC 938839616.
  9. ^ "Rosa Kael, Born 11/30/1913 in California". CaliforniaBirthIndex.org. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
  10. ^ Kehlmann, Robert (2012). "Kael, Pauline – Movie Critic". Berkeley Historical Plaque Project. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
  11. ^ Houston, Penelope (September 5, 2001). "Pauline Kael". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
  12. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 11.
  13. ^ a b c d e Rich, Frank (October 27, 2011). "Roaring at the Screen With Pauline Kael". The New York Times. Retrieved February 10, 2021. all poets, and all gay or bisexual — Robert Duncan, Robert Horan and James Broughton...Kael and Horan hitchhiked across America in 1941...By the early '50s, she was running a laundry and tailoring business off Market Street...When she learned that Gina had a congenital heart defect, she could not afford the surgery needed to repair it....Arguing with a friend about a film in a Berkeley coffeehouse in the fall of 1952, she was overheard by Peter D. Martin, the founder of a new film-criticism journal, City Lights....attracted the attention of Mary McCarthy, among others...led to Kael's writing program notes for the films he booked, which in turn led to her commandeering almost all aspects of the theater...The piece that finally brought Kael east for keeps was a 7,000-word exegesis of "Bonnie and Clyde" that she wrote as an implicit tryout for The New Yorker in 1967.
  14. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 10.
  15. ^ a b c Tucker, Ken (February 9, 1999). "A gift for effrontery". Salon.com. Archived from the original on February 6, 2007. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  16. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 95.
  17. ^ a b c d Houston, Penelope (September 5, 2001). "Obituary: Pauline Kael". The Guardian. London. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  18. ^ a b Seligman (2004). p. 37.
  19. ^ "Death of Fine Arts Cinema Ends a Legendary Tradition". The Berkeley Daily Planet. July 2, 2004. Retrieved February 9, 2021. In 1951, Landberg had opened the Cinema Guild and Studio in a small storefront at 2436 Telegraph Ave. Two years later he met and married fellow film fanatic Kael, then a single mother struggling to make her mark in criticism.
  20. ^ "Cinema-Guild and Studio in Berkeley, CA". Cinema Treasures. Retrieved September 28, 2020.
  21. ^ Lopate, Phillip (November–December 2011). "Pauline Kael: A Life in the Dark review (Extended)". Film Comment. Retrieved February 9, 2021. Their marriage proved a fiasco, but Landberg agreed to pay for Gina's operation, which Kellow suspects had been Kael's motive all along.
  22. ^ Hom, Lisa (November 21, 2001). "All Hail Kael: A film series remembers the uncompromising New Yorker critic Pauline Kael". San Francisco Weekly. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  23. ^ a b Thomson, David (2002). "Pauline Kael." The New Biographical Dictionary of Film. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 0-375-70940-1. p. 449-50.
  24. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 3-4.
  25. ^ Kael, Pauline (1968). Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Toronto: Bantam. ISBN 0-316-48163-7. p. 214-5.
  26. ^ "THE SOUND OF MUSIC: Kael's Fate". The New York Times. September 3, 2000. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  27. ^ "'Bonnie and Clyde,' Pauline Kael, and the Essay That Changed Film Criticism". Flavorwire. August 11, 2017. Retrieved November 5, 2017.
  28. ^ Overbey, Erin (March 17, 2010). "Eighty-Five From the Archive: Pauline Kael". The New Yorker.
  29. ^ Kael, Pauline. "The Frightening Power of "Bonnie and Clyde"". The New Yorker. No. October 21, 1967. pp. 147–171.
  30. ^ Desta, Yohana. "50 Years Later: How Bonnie and Clyde Violently Divided Film Critics". HWD. Vanity Fair. Retrieved November 5, 2017.
  31. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 12
  32. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 12.
  33. ^ "The Pearls of Pauline". Time. July 12, 1968. Archived from the original on December 13, 2006. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  34. ^ "National Book Awards – 1974". National Book Foundation. Retrieved 2012-03-10. (With acceptance speech by Kael.)
    "Arts and Letters" was an award category from 1964 to 1976.
  35. ^ Kael, Pauline (July 22, 1973). "Marilyn: A Rip-Off With Genius". The New York Times. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  36. ^ Kael, Pauline (July 14, 1975). "The Man from Dream City". The New Yorker. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  37. ^ a b Kael, Pauline; Welles, Orson; Mankiewicz, Herman J. (1971). The Citizen Kane Book. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. OCLC 209252.
  38. ^ Kael, Pauline (February 20, 1971). "Raising Kane—I". The New Yorker. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  39. ^ Kael, Pauline (February 27, 1971). "Raising Kane—II". The New Yorker. Retrieved August 20, 2015.
  40. ^ Welles, Orson; Bogdanovich, Peter; Rosenbaum, Jonathan (1992). This is Orson Welles. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 0-06-016616-9.
  41. ^ Bogdanovich, Peter; Welles, Orson (uncredited) (October 1972). "The Kane Mutiny". Esquire: 99–105, 180–190.
  42. ^ Carringer, Robert L. (2004) [1978]. "The Scripts of Citizen Kane". In Naremore, James (ed.). Orson Welles's Citizen Kane: A Casebook. Oxford University Press. pp. 79–121. ISBN 978-0-19-515892-2.
  43. ^ Rich, Frank (October 27, 2011). "Roaring at the Screen with Pauline Kael". The New York Times. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  44. ^ This is Orson Welles, Introduction : My Orson, page xxiii–xv, Da Capo Press, 1998 Edition
  45. ^ Rigg, Julie (April 4, 2000). "Pauline Kael – A Tribute – Senses of Cinema".
  46. ^ Davis (2002). p. 32.
  47. ^ a b c d Goodman, Susan (March–April 1998). "She Lost It At the Movies". Modern Maturity. Archived from the original (reprint) on March 3, 2016. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  48. ^ a b Davis (2002). p. 40.
  49. ^ Adler, Renata (August 14, 1980). "The Perils of Pauline". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  50. ^ "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (Ouch Ouch)". Time. August 4, 1980. Archived from the original on April 6, 2008.
  51. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 137.
  52. ^ Kilday, Gregg; Kellow, Brian (October 24, 2011). "How Hollywood Seduced and Abandoned Critic Pauline Kael (Exclusive Book Excerpt)". Hollywood Reporter.
  53. ^ a b Maslin, Janet (March 13, 1991). "For Pauline Kael, Retirement as Critic Won't Be a Fade-Out". The New York Times. Retrieved March 25, 2008.
  54. ^ a b Corliss, Richard (November 7, 1994). "That Wild Old Woman". Time. Archived from the original on April 6, 2008. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  55. ^ "Pauline Kael". geocities.ws.
  56. ^ Madder Than Hell: How Network Anticipated Contemporary Media - The Atlantic
  57. ^ Cinema Scope|I Lost It at the Movies: Charlie Kaufman's Antkind and I'm Thinking of Ending Things
  58. ^ "Pauline Kael: Last Broadcast, KPFA and Report to the Subscriber by Trevor Thomas" – via Internet Archive.
  59. ^ Dargis, Manohla (May 5, 2011). "San Francisco, the Crossroads of the Avant-Garde". The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
  60. ^ "Film since World War Two – Pauline Kael 1968" – via Internet Archive.
  61. ^ Shoah|AV Club
  62. ^ Five Classic Pauline Kael Reviews|The New Yorker
  63. ^ Patterson, John (September 6, 2001). "Exit the hatchet woman: Why Pauline Kael was bad for world cinema". The Guardian. Retrieved August 18, 2015.
  64. ^ "Pauline Kael's last broadcasts" – via Internet Archive.
  65. ^ Powell, Michael (July 9, 2009). "A Survivor of Film Criticism's Heroic Age". The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
  66. ^ "Pauline and Me: Farewell, My Lovely | The New York Observer". The New York Observer. October 11, 2008. Archived from the original on October 11, 2008.
  67. ^ Kael, Pauline, "Raising Kane," The New Yorker, February 20, 1971.
  68. ^ FilmInt. Film International. 2007. p. 22. Retrieved August 13, 2011.
  69. ^ a b Kael, Pauline. 5001 Nights at the Movies, Henry Holt and Company, 1991. ISBN 0-8050-1367-9
  70. ^ a b Kael, Pauline. Deeper into Movies, Warner Books, 1973. ISBN 0-7145-0941-8
  71. ^ Kael, Pauline (January 1, 1972). "A CLOCKWORK ORANGE: STANLEY STRANGELOVE – Review". The New Yorker – via Scraps from the Loft.
  72. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 91.
  73. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 151.
  74. ^ a b Seligman (2004). p. 152.
  75. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 155.
  76. ^ Seligman (2004). p. 156.
  77. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 96.
  78. ^ Shenker, Israel (December 28, 1972). "2 Critics Here Focus on Films As Language Conference Opens" (fee required). The New York Times. Retrieved April 18, 2007.
  79. ^ Brody, Richard (February 24, 2011). "My Oscar Picks". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 4, 2016. Retrieved June 25, 2016.
  80. ^ Podhoretz, John (February 27, 2011). "The Actual Pauline Kael Quote—Not As Bad, and Worse". Commentary. Retrieved June 25, 2016.
  81. ^ Robert David Sullivan (June 30, 2008). "Changing the polarized electoral landscape". The Boston Globe. Retrieved June 5, 2011.
  82. ^ Barnes, Joe (October 17, 2012). "Beware the Pauline Kael syndrome". Baker Institute Blog. Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on October 18, 2012. Retrieved June 25, 2016.
  83. ^ Brooks, David (June 29, 1998). "David Brooks and Susan Estrich". Slate.
  84. ^ Brantley (1996). p. 16.
  85. ^ Scott, A.O. (September 16, 2001). "The Movies Lose a Love And a Friend". The New York Times. Retrieved April 2, 2008.
  86. ^ Denby, David (October 20, 2003). "My Life As a Paulette". The New Yorker.
  87. ^ "Charlie Rose - charlierose.com". charlierose.com. Archived from the original on March 29, 2008. Retrieved April 3, 2008.
  88. ^ a b c Menand, Louis (March 23, 1995). "Finding It at the Movies". The New York Review of Books. Retrieved April 2, 2008. In his review, Menand writes of Kael's influence on Sragow, Edelstein, and Marcus
  89. ^ "Q&A: Elvis Mitchell: Part 1", Undercover Black Man, March 5, 2007.
  90. ^ Biggins, Walter (January 14, 2014). "In Defense of Armond White | Features | Roger Ebert". www.rogerebert.com/.
  91. ^ Zacharek, Stephanie (September 3, 2001). "The critic: Pauline Kael, R.I.P." Salon.
  92. ^ "Pauletteburo?: Fur flies over the Kael "kopy kats"". The Phoenix. March 27, 1997. Archived from the original on February 5, 2007. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  93. ^ Espen, Hal (March 21, 1994). "Kael Talks". The New Yorker. pp. 134–43.
  94. ^ Jacobs, Diane (November 14, 1999). "REVIEW: Running Time: 17,356,680 Minutes". The New York Times. Retrieved April 19, 2007.
  95. ^ WIF Projects. "Past Recipients". wif.org. Archived from the original on July 24, 2011.
  96. ^ "Pauline Kael". www.telegraph.co.uk. September 5, 2001. Archived from the original on January 12, 2022.
  97. ^ Anderson, Wes (January 29, 1999). "My Private Screening With Pauline Kael". New York Times. Retrieved November 8, 2008.
  98. ^ Feeney, Mark (September 6, 2005). "Viewing the parcels of Pauline". Boston Globe. Retrieved January 19, 2007.
  99. ^ Paglia, Camille (2018). "The Decline of Film Criticism". Provocations: Collected Essays. New York City: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 103. ISBN 978-1-5247-4689-6.
  100. ^ Kael, Pauline (January 8, 1990). "Melodrama/Cartoon/Mess". The New Yorker. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  101. ^ Moore, Michael (January 12, 2000). "Pauline Kael, the Truth, and Nothing But..." Fun People Archive. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  102. ^ "What She Said: The Art of Pauline Kael". Seattle International Film Festival.
  103. ^ "Ridley Scott Stopped Reading Reviews". Yahoo.
  104. ^ "Search Results". John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. Archived from the original on June 22, 2011. Retrieved April 28, 2010.
  105. ^ "Past Winners". George Polk Awards. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  106. ^ "National Book Award Winners". National Book Foundation. Archived from the original on May 6, 2012. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  107. ^ "The Crystal + Lucy Awards". Women in Film. Archived from the original on July 28, 2016. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  108. ^ "Past Honorees". New York Women in Film & Television. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  109. ^ "MEL NOVIKOFF AWARD". San Francisco International Film Festival. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  110. ^ "20th Annual Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards". Los Angeles Film Critics Association. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved September 1, 2018.
  111. ^ "1995 Winners and nominees". Gotham Independent Film Awards. Archived from the original on September 21, 2015. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  112. ^ "Film Hall of Fame: Support – Online Film & Television Association".

Works cited

edit

Further reading

edit
edit
 
Wikiquote has quotations related to Pauline Kael.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pauline_Kael&oldid=1256337225"