The Pennsylvania High Court of Errors and Appeals was a public tribunal existing from 1780 to 1808; it was the court of last resort in the Commonwealth. The Pennsylvania General Assembly created it during the American Revolution to take the place of the British Appeals Committee of the Privy Council. The High Court heard cases from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and other lower state courts. Eventually the General Assembly voted to abolish the High Court, effective in 1808, and transfer its powers to the state supreme court.
| Pennsylvania High Court of Errors and Appeals | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
| Established | 1780 |
| Location | Philadelphia |
| Authorised by | statute of Pennsylvania General Assembly |
Establishment
edit[I]t is requisite that the good people of this commonwealth, who have adopted the common law of England, should enjoy the full benefit thereof by the erection of a competent jurisdiction within this state for the hearing, determining and judging in the last instance upon complaints of error at common law; and also . . . of the court of admiralty . . . and likewise . . . of the several registers of wills and for granting administrations.
An Act for Erecting an [sic] High Court of Errors and Appeals (1780)
.svg)
Until the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the ultimate tribunal for the American colonies was the Privy Council in London. Then as now, a committee of the Privy Council heard cases from certain overseas jurisdictions under the rule of the British crown.[1] One legal effect of American Independence, however, was permanently ending the flow of cases to London from the newly-independent United States. A judicial void was left by the disappearance of the Privy Council as the final tribunal for the Commonwealth.
An Act in 1780 established the High Court of Errors and Appeals.[2] The High Court's jurisdiction encompassed cases brought up from Pennsylvania's supreme court, register's courts, and state admiralty court. The establishing statute recited, "the good people of this commonwealth, by their happy deliverance from their late dependent condition [on Britain], and by becoming free and sovereign are released from this badge of slavery and have acquired the transcendent benefit of having justice administered to them at home and at moderate cost and charges."[2] The 1780 Act permitted parties whose cases to the Privy Council had not been adjudicated by July 4, 1776−the date of American Independence−to refile their cases in the new High Court.[2][3]
Name of the court
editThe High Court was called a court of "Errors and Appeals", and not a court "of Appeals" because in the English judicial process there was a difference between a proceeding in error and an appeal.[4] "A writ of error ordered judges to send the record of their proceedings in a particular case to a superior court for inspection. ... The court of error could concern itself only with 'manifest error' revealed by the written words (as where an essential procedural step was missing), or with new facts[.]"[4] The other party in the case would hear the alleged errors and could dispute them. After argument by the attorneys for each party, the court of errors could affirm or reverse the judgment of the lower court.[4] In contrast, an appeal allowed a higher court to look "behind the record" of the written words and determine, for example, if the lower court had made a mistake in law in the case.[4]
Courtrooms
editDespite the difficulties of travel for almost 300 miles and across the Allegheny Mountains from the western part of Pennsylvania, the 1780 Act directed that the High Court was to sit only in Philadelphia, in the far southeastern corner of the Commonwealth.[2] In Philadelphia the High Court met in the Pennsylvania State House (now Independence Hall), in the courtroom usually used by the state supreme court, directly across the vestibule from the Assembly Room in which both the Declaration of Independence and United States Constitution were debated and signed. In 1804, however, the High Court's sessions moved to the Philadelphia County Courthouse (now called Congress Hall), where it met until the court's dissolution in 1808.[5]
Judges
edit
When first set up, the judges of the High Court comprised the president of the Supreme Executive Council, the judges of the supreme court, the judge of the Pennsylvania admiralty court, and "three persons of known integrity and ability". Until its 1791 reorganization, the High Court's members included both non-lawyers such as Benjamin Franklin, and noted lawyers as Joseph Reed, and John Dickinson. Some of the existing judges were reappointed after the General Assembly reorganized the High Court in 1791.
Judges of the High Court of Errors and Appeals, 1780–1808
edit| Judge | Began term(s) of office |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Franklin | 1785 |
| John Dickinson | 1782 |
| Joseph Reed | 1780 |
| William Moore | 1781 |
| Thomas Mifflin | 1788 |
| Thomas McKean | 1780, 1791 |
| Edward Shippen IV | 1784, 1791 |
| William Tilghman | 1805 |
| James Riddle | 1794 |
| Benjamin Chew | 1791 |
| Jasper Yeates | 1791 |
| Thomas Smith | 1794 |
| James Biddle | 1791 |
| William Augustus Atlee | 1780, 1791 |
| John Evans | 1780 |
| George Bryan | 1780 |
| William Bradford Jr. | 1791 |
| Hugh Henry Brackenridge | 1799 |
| Jacob Rush | 1784, 1791 |
| Thomas Cooper | 1804 |
| Samuel Miles | 1783 |
| Henry Wynkoop | 1790 |
| James Smith | 1780 |
| Francis Hopkinson | 1780 |
| James Bayard | 1783 |
| Alexander Addison | 1791 |
| John D. Coxe | 1797 |
| John Joseph Henry | 1793 |
Reorganization and abolition
editAfter Pennsylvania's Constitution of 1790 became effective, the Supreme Executive Council was replaced by a single Governor of Pennsylvania, and the judicial, legislative, and executive powers were separated for the first time in the Commonwealth. The General Assembly necessarily needed to change the composition of the High Court to comply with the new constitution's prescribed separation of powers. Under a 1791 Act, the High Court's bench was redefined as comprising the judges of the supreme court, the presidents of the various courts of common pleas throughout the Commonwealth, and three other persons of known legal ability.[6] In addition, since the federal courts had taken on exclusive admiralty jurisdiction after the United States Constitution came into force in 1789, there was no more Pennsylvania Admiralty Court, and so no state admiralty cases for the High Court to hear, and no admiralty judge to sit on the High Court's bench.
By 1806 the General Assembly determined there was no further need for a judicial layer above the state supreme court (in its entire existence only thirty-three cases had been argued before the High Court);[7] it abolished the High Court of Errors and Appeals and transferred its jurisdiction over appeals and errors to the state supreme court, to be effective in 1808 so that the High Court would have two additional terms to dispose of pending cases before dissolving.[8][9] The terminal hearing of the High Court was on July 10, 1808.[5]
Case reports
editNot all cases in the High Court resulted in an opinion and not all of its opinions have been published.
United States Reports
editAlexander Dallas, a lawyer in Philadelphia who later served as U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, began publishing a series of case reports in what became the United States Reports. The decisions appearing in the early United States Reports are not decisions only of the United States Supreme Court as they were in subsequent volumes. Instead, they include decisions from various Pennsylvania courts. Dallas published a total of four volumes of decisions, and selected cases of the Pennsylvania High Court of Errors and Appeals appear in the first, second, and fourth of Dallas's volumes.
Other reporters
editOther cases from the High Court (some only mentioned in short notes) are scattered throughout Pennsylvania case compilations by Alexander Addison (Addison's Reports (Add.)), Jasper Yeates (Yeates's Reports (Yeates)), Horace Binney (Binney's Reports (Binn.)), and Peter A. Browne (Browne's Reports).
Partial list of cases in the High Court of Errors and Appeals, 1780–1808
edit| Case | Citation | Comments | Link to Opinion or Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montgomery v. Henry | 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 49 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1780) | full opinion | [2] |
| Talbot v. Commanders of Three Brigs | 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 95 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1784) | full opinion | [3] |
| Lawson v. Morrison | 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 286 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1792) | full opinion | [4] |
| Hannum v. Spear | 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 291 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1795) | full opinion | [5] |
| Ludlow v. Bingham | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 41 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1799) | full opinion | [6] |
| Burd v. Smith | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 66 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1802) | full opinion | [7] |
| Lea v. Yard | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 82 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1804) | full opinion | [8] |
| Purviance v. Angus | 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 180 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1786) | full opinion | [9] |
| Lewis v. Maris | 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 278 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1788) | full opinion | [10] |
| Kirkbridge v. Durden | 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 288 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1788) | full opinion | [11] |
| Lacaze v. Pennsylvania ex rel. Lanoix | 1 Add. 59 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1793) | full opinion | [12] |
| M'Pherson v. M'Pherson | 1 Add. 327 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1797) | full opinion | [13] |
| Skinner v. Robison | 1 Browne 358 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1804) | note only | [10] |
| Palmer v. Sparkes | 4 Yeates 385 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1801) | note only | [11] |
| Hill v. West | 4 Yeates 385 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1807) | case report on remand to supreme court | [11] |
| Stiles v. Girard | 4 Yeates 1 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 17??) | note only | [11] |
| Vasse v. Ball | 2 Yeates 185 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1797) | note only | [12] |
| Johnson v. Haine's Lessee | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 55 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1799) | full opinion | [14] |
| Spear v. Hannum | 1 Yeates 388 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1795) | note only | [13] |
| Furry v. Stone | 1 Yeates 187 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1792) | note only | [13] |
| Fitzgerald v. Caldwell | 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 215 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1793) | full opinion at end of supreme court's opinion | [15] |
| Hill's Lessee v. West | 1 Binn. 488 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1808) | note only | [14] |
| Dempsey v. Insurance Co. | 1 Binn. 299 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1808) | note only | [14] |
| Hassanclever v. Tucker | 2 Binn. 525 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1803) | full opinion | [16] |
| Hauer's Lessee v. Sheetz | 2 Binn. 532 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1807) | full opinion | [17] |
| Insurance Co. v. Jones | 2 Binn. 547 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1807) | full opinion | [18] |
| Ewing v. Houston | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 58 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1799) | full opinion | [19] |
| Livezey v. Gorgas | 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 61 (Pa. Ct. Err. & App. 1799) | full opinion | [20] |
Records
editRecords of the High Court are held at the Pennsylvania State Archives in the capital city, Harrisburg.[15] These records are:
Minutes and writs of the High Court of Errors and Appeals
editA record of the proceedings of the High Court of Errors and Appeals between April 6, 1780 and July 2, 1808. Data includes date of session, names of plaintiff (appellant), defendant (appellee), their attorneys, court members present; listings of writs of error and docketed cases, the courts or counties from which the appeal was made, and a listing of cases argued, adjudged and subsequent orders by the court. (Series #33.128)
Mittimus papers
editMittimus[16] papers covering the years 1783–1785, 1788, 1792–1793, 1795, 1798–1799, 1801, and 1804. These include writs affirming the judgments of the Supreme Court as decided by the High Court of Errors and Appeals, and remitting the case back to the Supreme Court for execution of judgment. Information has names of appellant and appellee; nature of the case; High Court of Errors and Appeals judgment; date writ was returned to the Supreme Court. (Series #33.129)
See also
edit
References
edit- ^ "The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council". www.jcpc.uk. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
- ^ a b c d An Act for Erecting an [sic] High Court of Errors and Appeals. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via babel.hathitrust.org.
- ^ Scherer, Bernard (January 1994). "B.F. Scherer, The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and the Origins of King's Bench Power, 32 Duquesne L. Rev. 525, 529 (1994)". Duquesne Law Review. 32 (3): 525. Retrieved March 20, 2021.
- ^ a b c d Baker, Sir John. An Introduction to English Legal History Fifth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2019), p. 146.
- ^ a b Konkle, Burton Alva. Benjamin Chew, 1722-1810. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (1932), pp. 218, 278, 284.
- ^ An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the Commonwealth in Conformity to the Alterations and Amendments in the Constitution. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via babel.hathitrust.org.
- ^ "6 American L. Register 238, 248 (1858)". jstor.org. JSTOR 3301774. Retrieved March 26, 2021.
- ^ An Act to Alter the Judiciary System of this Commonwealth. Laws, etc. (Compiled statutes : 1700-1825). Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via babel.hathitrust.org.
- ^ Loyd, William H. The Early Courts of Pennsylvania. Boston: The Boston Book Company (1910), p. 136.
- ^ Browne, Peter A. Reports of cases adjudged in the Court of common pleas of the first judicial district of Pennsylvania [1801-1814], Volume 1. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via hathitrust.org.
- ^ a b c Yeates, Jasper (1871). Reports of cases adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania with some select cases at nisi prius, and in the Circuit courts [1791-1808], Volume 4. Yeates reports. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via hathitrust.org.
- ^ Yeates, Jasper (1871). Reports of cases adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania with some select cases at nisi prius, and in the Circuit courts [1791-1808], Volume 2. Yeates reports. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via hathitrust.org.
- ^ a b Yeates, Jasper (1871). Reports of cases adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania with some select cases at nisi prius, and in the Circuit courts [1791-1808], Volume 1. Yeates reports. Retrieved March 25, 2021 – via hathitrust.org.
- ^ a b Binney, Horace. Reports of cases adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Volume 1. Binney's reports. William P. Farrand and Co. Retrieved March 25, 2021.
- ^ "General Index to Women's Resources at the PA State Archives". phmc.pa.gov/Archives. Retrieved March 25, 2021.
- ^ In this context, a "mittimus" is a writ for moving papers from one court to another, e.g., from the High Court to the lower court from which the appeal originated. See Wiktionary, second definition under "Noun": [1]