Portrait of Mlle Rachel is an oil painting on millboard by English artist William Etty, painted during the 1840s and currently in the York Art Gallery. It shows the tragic actress Élisa Rachel Félix, better known as Mademoiselle Rachel, at the time one of the most acclaimed actresses in France. The subject is not shown looking at the artist, but glancing anxiously out of the picture with tears in her eyes. The work was probably painted during one of Rachel's tours of London in the 1840s. It appears unfinished, suggesting that it was painted in a single sitting and Rachel did not return to give Etty the opportunity to complete it.
Background
editWilliam Etty was born in 1787, the son of a York baker and miller.[1] He began as an apprentice printer in Hull.[2] On completing his seven-year apprenticeship he moved at the age of 18 to London.[3] Over the following years he became a significant history painter, specialising in nude figures in historical, literary and mythological settings.[4] He was elected a full Royal Academician in 1828,[5] at that time the most prestigious honour available to an artist.[6][A] Although almost exclusively known for his nude history paintings, he also occasionally painted portraits, despite portraiture at the time being considered a lower art form than history painting.[7][B]
Subject
edit
Portrait of Mlle Rachel depicts the French actress Élisa Rachel Félix, commonly known as Mademoiselle Rachel.[11] Rachel was born in 1821 to poor Jewish parents,[12] and in 1838 made her debut in Paris in Pierre Corneille's Horace, a performance described as causing "a revolution in public taste".[13] She rapidly became one of the most respected actresses in France, and "the ornament of every fashionable drawing-room of Paris".[13] Although contracted to the Comédie-Française, she was important enough to the company that she was able to negotiate four months of leave each year, allowing her to perform abroad with other companies.[14] In May 1841 Rachel visited London, giving a series of extremely well regarded performances.[11]
It is not in [passion] that, in our opinion, Mademoiselle Rachel chiefly excels, but in the exhibitions of the quiet emotions of irony, of sudden intelligence, of mute pain, and, above all, in elocution, in her appropriation of emphasis whenever she is determined (which she is not always) to give a phrase its full meaning. [...] The other actors in the tragedy we purposely pass over, for there is no occasion to dwell on a company merely designed to get through, as chance may direct, the portions of the play not acted by Rachel.
Rachel returned to London for further tours in 1842, 1846 and 1847.[16] It is not certain when and how Etty and Rachel met, but it may well have been through his friend William Macready, then the manager of the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane.[17]
In keeping with the tragic roles in which she then specialised, Rachel is not shown looking at the artist, but glancing anxiously out of the picture with moist eyes.[11] The painting appears to be unfinished, suggesting that it was painted in a single sitting and Etty did not have the opportunity to have Rachel pose again.[11] Despite this, Etty's 1958 biographer Dennis Farr has described it as a work "of extreme sensitivity and perception".[18] The painting is painted on millboard, and has an oil sketch by Etty of a crouching nude woman on the reverse side.[19]
Legacy
edit
Although Etty painted a number of private portraits of his friends and acquaintances, he produced very few publicly exhibited portraits, fewer than 30 of which were shown during his lifetime.[10] Mlle Rachel was not exhibited during his lifetime; it was possibly among the more than 800 paintings from his studio sold after his death.[20] Etty died in November 1849 and soon fell out of fashion; by the late 19th century the values of all his paintings had fallen below their original prices.[21]
Mademoiselle Rachel remained a prominent figure in French society, and was the mistress of Alexandre Colonna-Walewski (with whom she had a son), Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte and Napoléon Joseph Charles Paul Bonaparte. On her death in early 1858, attempts by newspapers to publish pictures of her on her deathbed led to the introduction of privacy rights into French law, which have remained in place since.[22]
The ownership of Mlle Rachel in the years following Etty's death is not recorded. The painting was untitled, and its attribution as a painting of Rachel is based on its similarity to other depictions of her.[23] It was bought by the York Art Gallery in 1961,[11] where as of 2015[update] it remains.[19] It formed part of a major exhibition of Etty's work in 2011–12.[11] A pastel drawing also attributed to Etty, showing a much younger Mademoiselle Rachel, entered the collections of Sir Robert Witt (1872–1952), and on Witt's death was bequeathed to the Courtauld Institute of Art.[16]
Footnotes
edit- ^ In Etty's time, honours such as knighthoods were only bestowed on presidents of major institutions, not on even the most well respected artists.[6]
- ^ As portrait painting was seen as simply reflecting nature while history painting involved more creativity and also gave the artist the opportunity to tell moral lessons, history painting was much more highly regarded as an art form.[8] Portraiture provided a more stable income for artists, as history paintings were generally sold at exhibition for no less than the asking price, and as a consequence often remained unsold, while portraits were commissioned by the subject or their family, providing a guaranteed source of income to the artist.[9]
References
editNotes
edit- ^ "William Etty". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/8925. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Gilchrist 1855, p. 23.
- ^ Burnage 2011a, p. 157.
- ^ Smith 1996, p. 86.
- ^ Burnage 2011b, p. 118.
- ^ a b Robinson 2007, p. 135.
- ^ Burnage 2011c, pp. 228–29.
- ^ Burnage 2011c, p. 228.
- ^ Burnage 2011c, p. 236.
- ^ a b Burnage 2011c, p. 229.
- ^ a b c d e f Burnage 2011c, p. 242.
- ^ Stokes 1996, p. 68.
- ^ a b Darcie 1855, p. 12.
- ^ Stokes 1996, p. 69.
- ^ "Her Majesty's Theatre". The Times. No. 17677. London. 22 May 1841. col B, p. 5.
- ^ a b Farr 1958, p. 169.
- ^ Farr 1958, p. 92.
- ^ Farr 1958, p. 93.
- ^ a b "Portrait of Mlle Rachel". York: York Museums Trust. 2015. Retrieved 25 June 2015.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 61.
- ^ Robinson 2007, p. 440.
- ^ Smartt, Ursula (2011). Media and Entertainment Law. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. p. 26. ISBN 9781136736414.
- ^ Robinson 2007, p. 335.
Bibliography
edit- Burnage, Sarah (2011a). "Etty and the Masters". In Burnage, Sarah; Hallett, Mark; Turner, Laura (eds.). William Etty: Art & Controversy. London: Philip Wilson Publishers. pp. 154–97. ISBN 9780856677014. OCLC 800599710.
- Burnage, Sarah (2011b). "History Painting and the Critics". In Burnage, Sarah; Hallett, Mark; Turner, Laura (eds.). William Etty: Art & Controversy. London: Philip Wilson Publishers. pp. 106–54. ISBN 9780856677014. OCLC 800599710.
- Burnage, Sarah (2011c). "Portraiture". In Burnage, Sarah; Hallett, Mark; Turner, Laura (eds.). William Etty: Art & Controversy. London: Philip Wilson Publishers. pp. 228–50. ISBN 9780856677014. OCLC 800599710.
- Darcie, John (1855). The Biography of Mdlle. Rachel. New York: John Darcie and Wardle Corbyn. OCLC 793694749.
- Farr, Dennis (1958). William Etty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. OCLC 2470159.
- Gilchrist, Alexander (1855). Life of William Etty, R.A. Vol. 2. London: David Bogue. OCLC 2135826.
- Robinson, Leonard (2007). William Etty: The Life and Art. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company. ISBN 9780786425310. OCLC 751047871.
- Smith, Alison (2001). Exposed: The Victorian Nude. London: Tate Publishing. ISBN 1854373722.
- Smith, Alison (1996). The Victorian Nude. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 0719044030.
- Stokes, John (1996). Booth, Michael R.; Stokes, John; Bassnett, Susan (eds.). Three Tragic Actresses: Siddons, Rachel, Ristori. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521411158.