This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2022) |
Proto-Temotu (abbreviated as PTm) is the reconstructed ancestor of the Temotu languages of Temotu Province, Solomon Islands. It belongs to the Oceanic branch of the Austronesian languages.
| Proto-Temotu | |
|---|---|
| PTm | |
| Reconstruction of | Temotu languages |
| Region | Temotu Province |
Reconstructed ancestors | |
| Lower-order reconstructions | |
A partial reconstruction was done by Malcolm Ross and Åshild Næss in 2007, with further revisions by William James Lackey and Brenda H. Boerger in 2021.
Descendants
editProto-Temotu diversified into three primary branches: Reefs – Santa Cruz, Utupua, and Vanikoro.
Originally, some linguists had proposed to group Utupua and Vanikoro languages under a single Utupua–Vanikoro subgroup, sometimes labelled “Eastern Outer Islands”.[1] The unity of that subgroup has been however questioned by Lackey & Boerger (2021), who fail to identify shared phonological innovations for it.
Innovations
editProto-Temotu was a phonologically conservative language in many respects, and was evidently an early descendant of Proto-Oceanic. For example, it retained Proto-Oceanic final consonants, as evidenced in the paragogic addition of a final vowel in the Vanikoro languages; it retained the contrast between *n and *ñ, based on an occasional Asumbuo reflex of y, reflecting a distinction lost in almost all other Oceanic languages; and many others; and it retained Proto-Oceanic *R as a distinct sound, evidenced by its occasional loss in daughter languages in contrast to *r and *l, which are usually never lost.[2]
Nevertheless, Proto-Temotu can be defined by a handful of (admittedly weak) shared phonological innovations:
- Proto-Oceanic *l and *r merge as *l;
- Proto-Oceanic *s, *c, *j merge as *s;
- Lenition of Proto-Oceanic *q to a velar or uvular fricative, either [x] or [χ].
The small number of these shared innovations, and their weak diagnostic value, mean that the very existence of Proto-Temotu is still under debate: it is almost the same language as Proto-Oceanic itself, separated only by a few hundred years at most, as evidenced by the direct migration of Lapita peoples from the Bismarck Archipelago to the islands in present-day Temotu Province.
Sample words
editWords reconstructed for Proto-Temotu, according to Ross & Næss (2007), are:
- *amuk "mosquito" (< POc *ñamuk)
- *ima "hand" (< POc *lima)
- *li "five" (< POc *lima)
- *lu "two" (< POc *rua)
- *umʷaq "house" (< POc *Rumaq)
However, Lackey & Boerger (2021) consider some of Ross & Næss's reconstructions flawed, such as the word for "house". In Tanema, the word for "house" is nalama (na- being a fossilized article marker), showing a shift of *R > *l.
Notes
editReferences
edit- Ross, Malcolm; Åshild Næss (2007). "An Oceanic Origin for Aiwoo, the Language of the Reef Islands?". Oceanic Linguistics. 46 (2): 456–498. doi:10.1353/ol.2008.0003. hdl:1885/20053. S2CID 143716078.
- Lackey, William James; Boerger, Brenda H. (2021). "Reexamining the Phonological History of Oceanic's Temotu subgroup". Oceanic Linguistics. 60 (2): 367–411. doi:10.1353/ol.2021.0020. S2CID 244122506.
- François, Alexandre (2011), "Where *R they all? The history and geography of *R loss in Southern Oceanic" (PDF), Oceanic Linguistics, 50 (1): 142–199, doi:10.1353/ol.2011.0009
- Lynch, John; Tryon, D. T. (1985). "Central-Eastern Oceanic: a subgrouping hypothesis" (PDF). In Andrew Pawley; Lois Carrington (eds.). Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress. Pacific Linguistics, C-88. Canberra: Australian National University. pp. 31–52. doi:10.15144/PL-C88.31.
- Tryon, Darrell T.; Hackman, Bryan D. (1983). Solomon Islands languages: an internal classification. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. doi:10.15144/PL-C72.