This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The modern academic study of the psychology of religious conversion can be tracked back to 1881 when a series of lectures was delivered by early psychologist G. Stanley Hall.[1] In its early stages the psychology of religious conversion mainly addressed Christianity and to this day is dominated by studies of North American Protestant Christianity,[2] although other varieties of religion are addressed in the field of psychology of religion.
Theories of conversion
editRambo's Integrative Model
editRambo[3] provides a model for conversion that classifies it as a highly complex process that is hard to define. He views it as a process of religious change that is affected by an interaction of numerous events, experiences, ideologies, people, institutions, and how these different experiences interact and accumulate over time. From his research Rambo created an integrative model for conversion that occurs over seven stages.[3]
| Stage of process | Factors that must be assessed in this stage |
|---|---|
| Stage 1: Context | Factors that facilitate or hinder conversion |
| Stage 2: Crisis | May be personal, social, or both |
| Stage 3: Quest | Intentional activity on part of potential convert |
| Stage 4: Encounter | Recognition of other R/S option |
| Stage 5: Interaction | Extended engagement with new R/S option |
| Stage 6: Commitment | Identification with new R/S reality |
| Stage 7: Consequences | Transformation of beliefs, behaviors, or identity as result of new commitment |
Classic paradigm
editThe classic religious paradigm for conversion is highly dependent on the idea of sudden conversion. The prototypical sudden conversion is the Biblical depiction of the conversion of Paul on the road to Damascus. Sudden conversions are highly emotional but not necessarily rational. In these instances the convert is a passive agent being acted upon by external forces, and the conversion entails a dramatic transformation of self. Emotion dominates this dramatic, irrational transformation leading to a shift in self and belief, with behavior change to follow. For sudden converts conversion is not a back and forth drawn out process, but rather happens in one single instance and is permanent thereafter. Typically sudden conversions occur in childhood and are exceptionally emotional experiences. Often sudden conversions are the result of overwhelming anxiety and guilt from sin that becomes unbearable, making conversion a functional solution to ease these emotions.[4]
Emotional factors have been found to correlate with sudden conversions. Coe[5] maintains these correlations seem to suggest causation, citing his work in which 17 sudden converts who had dominant emotional factors affecting their conversion. However, Spellman, Baskett, and Byrnes[6] data suggest not. In their work they found that sudden converts only scored high on levels of emotionality following conversion, not prior to. No experimental or longitudinal studies have demonstrated a true causal relationship between emotion and sudden conversion.
Contemporary paradigm
editThe contemporary paradigm of conversion views the conversion process as a highly intellectual, well thought out gradual process. This contemporary model is a contrast to the classic model, and gradual conversion has been identified by Strickland[7] as a contrast to sudden conversion. Scobie[1] terms it an "unconscious conversion". Typically gradual conversions do not occur following a single, impactful event but rather are distinguished empirically and thoughtfully over a length of time. A gradual conversion can be identified by consciously striving toward the goal with no decisive point where conversion is initiated or converted. The process occurs cognitively and is much less emotional with no emotional crisis, guilt, or sin.
Age of conversion
editAverage age at the time of conversion has been examined by Johnson,[8] Roberts,[9] and Gillespie[10] and has been found to be between the ages of 15-16, a consistent finding over 40 years. These findings are consistent with Erikson's[11] conclusion that this is the age where individuals are testing the world around them and forming an identity. However, it has been pointed out by Silverstein[12] that sampling is generally biased as participant age rarely exceeds the early 20s. Spilka and others[4] suggest that better sampling is needed as generally study participants are college-age students and thus are not truly representative. Finally, in Western countries females typically convert one to two years before males.
Deconversion
editResearch of conversion is paralleled to a lesser extent by research on deconversion. Research on deconversion has been divided into two subgroups, new religious movements (NRM) and mainstream groups.
New religious movements
editThere are many reasons why people deconvert from new religious movements. A key factor to consider is that many times a NRM occurs in isolation from the outside world; when this isolation is broken deconversion may occur. [citation needed] NRM typically regulate interpersonal relationships, as the development of unregulated interpersonal relationships may lead to deconversion. [citation needed] Followers of a NRM may become frustrated when their efforts produce no success or social change and eventually abandon the movement. Finally, followers may become disillusioned with the movement or its leader and leave the movement.
Deconversion may occur suddenly or be a gradual process. Generally deconversion will be a quiet process for those who have only been a member of the NRM for one year or less. However, for those who have been a follower for longer than a year tend to go through confrontational, emotional, and dramatic deconversion processes.[citation needed]
Mainstream
editA minority of mainstream religious followers truly reject their faith and deconvert. Apostates make up just 7% of deconversions from mainstream religion. However, 80% will withdraw and later return.[13]
Generally there are two disengagement measures for the mainstream religious. In the first, behavioral, followers will go one month or longer without attending a religious service. The second type of disengagement, belief, sees followers go for a year or longer without religion being a part of their life.
Closely related phenomena
editApostasy
editApostasy is an individual's abandonment of their religious commitment and acceptance of a nonreligious lifestyle or joining a different movement of belief.
Deconversion
editDeconversion is the process by which converts leave their faith.
Intensification
editA revitalized commitment to a religion. This may be to a religion that one was brought up in or has only casually followed. Also referred to as "born again" or a "rebirth". In some religions the faithful follow procedures designed to induce experiences of intensification.[1]
Switching
editChanging religious identification group without radically changing as a person. An example would be switching religious denomination.
Cycling
editVarying religious participation across an individual's lifetime. Individual may drop out of religion to later return, or periodically fall out of the faith.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c Scobie, G. E. W. (1973). Types of religious conversion. Journal of Behavioral Science, 1, 265–271.
- ^ Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Psychology of religion. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 201–221.
- ^ a b Rambo, L. R. (1993). Understanding religious conversion. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.
- ^ a b Spilka, B. et al. (2003). The psychology of religion, an empirical approach. (3 ed.). New York, Ny: Guilford Pubn.
- ^ Coe, G. A. (1916). The psychology of religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Spellman, C. M., Baskett, G. D., & Byrne, D. (1971). Manifest anxiety as a contributing factor in religious conversion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 245–247.
- ^ Strickland, M. P. (1924). Psychology of religious experience. New York: Abingdon Press.
- ^ Johnson, P. E. (1959). Psychology of religion (rev.ed.). New York: Abingdon Press.
- ^ Roberts, F. J. (1965). Some psychological factors in religious conversion. British Journal of Social and Religious Psychology, 4, 185-187.
- ^ Gillespie, V. B. (1991). The dynamics of religious conversion: Identity and transformation. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
- ^ Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
- ^ Silverstein, S. A. (1988). A study of religious conversion in North America. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs, 114, 261–305.
- ^ Roozen, D. A. (1980). Church dropouts: Changing patterns of disengagement and re-entry. Review of Religious Research, 21, 427–450.