Radical theory is an obsolete scientific theory in chemistry describing the structure of organic compounds. The theory was pioneered by Justus von Liebig, Friedrich Wöhler and Auguste Laurent around 1830 and is not related to the modern understanding of free radicals.[1][2] In this theory, organic compounds were thought to exist as combinations of radicals that could be exchanged in chemical reactions just as chemical elements could be interchanged in inorganic compounds.
Preamble
editThe term radical was already in use when radical theory was developed. Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau introduced the phrase "radical" in 1785 and the phrase was employed by Antoine Lavoisier in 1789 in his Traité Élémentaire de Chimie. A radical was identified as the root base of certain acids (The Latin word "radix" meaning "root"). The combination of a radical with oxygen would result in an acid. For example the radical of acetic acid was called "acetic" and that of muriatic acid (hydrochloric acid) was called "muriatic". Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac found evidence for the cyanide radical in 1815 in his work on hydrogen cyanide and a number of cyanide salts he discovered. He also isolated cyanogen ((CN)2) not realizing that cyanogen is the cyanide dimer NC-CN. Jean-Baptiste Dumas proposed the ethylene radical from investigations into diethyl ether and ethanol. In his Etherin theory[3] he observed that ether consisted of two equivalents of ethylene and one equivalent of water and that ethylene and ethanol could interconvert in chemical reactions. Ethylene was also the base fragment for a number of other compounds such as ethyl acetate. This Etherin theory was eventually abandoned by Dumas in favor of radical theory. As a radical it should react with an oxide to form the hydrate but it was found that ethylene is resistant to an oxide like calcium oxide. Henri Victor Regnault in 1834 reacted ethylene dichloride (CH2CH2.Cl2) with KOH forming vinyl chloride, water, and KCl.[4] In etherin theory it should not be possible to break up the ethylene fragment in this way.
Radical theory replaced electrochemical dualism which stated that all molecules were to be considered as salts composed of basic and acidic oxides.
Theory
editLiebig and Wöhler observed in 1832 [5] in an investigation of benzoin resin (benzoic acid) that the compounds almond oil (benzaldehyde), "Benzoestoff" (benzyl alcohol), benzoyl chloride and benzamide all share a common C7H5O fragment and that these compounds could all be synthesized from almond oil by simple substitutions. The C7H5O fragment was considered a "radical of benzoic acid" and called benzoyl. Organic radicals were thus placed on the same level as the inorganic elements. Just like the inorganic elements (simple radicals) the organic radicals (compound radicals) were indivisible. The theory was developed thanks to improvements in elemental analysis by von Liebig. Laurent contributed to the theory by reporting the isolation of benzoyl itself in 1835,[6] however the isolated chemical is today recognised at its dimer dibenzoyl. Raffaele Piria reported the salicyl radical as the base for salicylic acid. Liebig published a definition of a radical in 1838 [7][8]
Berzelius and Robert Bunsen investigated the radical cacodyl (reaction of cacodyl chloride with zinc) around 1841, now also known as a dimer species (CH3)2As—As(CH3)2.[9] Edward Frankland and Hermann Kolbe contributed to the radical theory by investigating the ethyl and the methyl radicals. Frankland first reported diethylzinc in 1848. Frankland and Kolbe together investigated the reaction of ethyl cyanide and zinc in 1849 [10] reporting the isolation of not the ethyl radical but the methyl radical (CH3) which in fact was ethane. Kolbe also investigated the electrolysis of potassium salts of some fatty acids. Acetic acid was regarded as the combination of the methyl radical and oxalic acid and electrolysis of the salt yielded as gas again ethane misidentified as the liberated methyl radical. In 1850 Frankland investigated ethyl radicals.[11] In the course of this work butane formed by reaction of ethyl iodide and zinc was mistakenly identified as the ethyl radical.
Demise
editAugust Wilhelm von Hofmann, Auguste Laurent and Charles Frédéric Gerhardt challenged Frankland and Kolbe by suggesting that the ethyl radical was in fact a dimer called dimethyl. Frankland and Kolbe countered that ethyl hydride was also a possibility [3] and in 1864 Carl Schorlemmer proved that dimethyl and ethyl hydride were in fact one and the same compound.
Radical theory was eventually replaced by a number of theories each advocating specific entities. One adaptation of radical theory was called theory of types (theory of residues), advocated by Charles-Adolphe Wurtz, August Wilhelm von Hofmann and Charles Frédéric Gerhardt. Another was water type as promoted by Alexander William Williamson. Jean-Baptiste Dumas and Auguste Laurent (an early supporter of radical theory) challenged radical theory in 1840 with a Law of Substitution (or Theory of Substitution).[3] This law acknowledged that any hydrogen atom even as part of a radical could be substituted by a halogen.
Eventually Frankland in 1852 [12] and August Kekulé in 1857 [13] introduced valence theory with the tetravalency of carbon as its central theme, making trivalent carbon obsolete for the time being.
Legacy
editIn 1900 Moses Gomberg unexpectedly discovered true trivalent carbon and the first radical in the modern sense of the word in his (unsuccessful) attempt to make hexaphenylethane.[14] In current organic chemistry, concepts such as benzoyl[15] and acetyl[16] persist in chemical nomenclature but only to identify a functional group having the same fragment.
References
edit- ^ The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science John L. Heilbron Ed. 2003
- ^ Organic chemistry in the nineteenth century, Rochelle Forrester 2006 Link
- ^ a b c CHANDLER LECTURE M. Gomberg Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1928 20 (2), 159-159 doi:10.1021/ie50218a018
- ^ Regnault, H.V. (1835) Sur la Composition de la Liqueur des Hollandais et sur une nouvelle Substance éthérée. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, Gay-Lussac & Arago, Vol. 58, Paris, Crochard Libraire, 301–320 https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6569005x/f307.item.texteImage
- ^ Wöhler and Liebig Annale der Pharmacie, 3, 1832, 249
- ^ Annales de chimie , 59, 397 1835
- ^ Liebig, J. (1838), Ueber Laurent's Theorie der organischen Verbindungen. Ann. Pharm., 25: 1–31. doi:10.1002/jlac.18380250102
- ^ Robin Keen, The Life and Work of Friedrich Wohler. 1800 - 1883 Vol 2
- ^ Seyferth, Dietmar (2001). "Cadet's Fuming Arsenical Liquid and the Cacodyl Compounds of Bunsen". Organometallics. 20 (8): 1488–1498. doi:10.1021/om0101947.
- ^ Kolbe, Hermann; Frankland, Edward (1849). "On the products of the action of potassium on cyanide of ethyl". Journal of the Chemical Society. 1: 60–74. doi:10.1039/QJ8490100060.
- ^ Frankland, Edward (1850). "On the isolation of the organic radicals". Journal of the Chemical Society. 2 (3): 263–296. doi:10.1039/QJ8500200263.
- ^ Frankland, E. (1852). Phil. Trans., vol. cxlii, 417.
- ^ Aug. Kekulé (1857). "Über die s. g. gepaarten Verbindungen und die Theorie der mehratomigen Radicale". Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie. 104 (2): 129–150. doi:10.1002/jlac.18571040202.
- ^ Gomberg, M. (2002-05-01). "On Trivalent Carbon". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 23 (7): 496–502. doi:10.1021/ja02033a015.
- ^ Maki, Takao; Takeda, Kazuo. "Benzoic Acid and Derivatives". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a03_555. ISBN 978-3527306732..
- ^ Constable, Edwin C.; Housecroft, Catherine E. (2020-04-20). "Before Radicals Were Free – the Radical Particulier of de Morveau". Chemistry. 2 (2): 293–304. doi:10.3390/chemistry2020019. ISSN 2624-8549.