Wikipedia

Railway privatisation in Argentina

Railway privatisation in Argentina was a process which began in 1989 under the presidency of Carlos Menem, following a series of neoliberal economic reforms. This primarily consisted of breaking up the state-owned railway company Ferrocarriles Argentinos (FA) and allowing the former lines to be operated by private companies instead of the state.[2][1]

Railway privatisation in Argentina
Carlos Menem's administration carried out
the privatisation process
Duration1989–1999 [1]
LocationArgentina
ThemeConcession granted to private companies to operate the Argentine rail transport network
CauseFerrocarriles Argentinos deficit
Reform of the state [2]
ParticipantsGovernment of Argentina
Several private consortiums

This policy was met with widespread criticism and proved catastrophic for the Argentine railways whose service worsened significantly in the years that followed, with entire lines closing and infrastructure deteriorating beyond repair.[3][4][5] Privatisation was ultimately reversed in 2015 with the creation of Nuevos Ferrocarriles Argentinos.[6][7]

Background

edit
 
Sarmiento Railway rolling stock during the FA era

Since railway nationalisation in 1948, during the presidency of Juan Perón, the network had been operated by the state-owned company Ferrocarriles Argentinos (FA) which comprised the six relatively independent divisions, Sarmiento, Mitre, Urquiza, San Martín, Belgrano and Roca.[8]

By the time President Carlos Menem's administration took over in 1989, FA had a serious economic deficit, with no investment projected and a high amount of social charges owed to the state. The amount of freight services had considerably decreased between 1970 and 1990, going from 13,500 million tons to 7,500 million twenty years later, almost a 55% decrease. The infrastructure and rolling stock were seriously deteriorated, with the exception of the central network. The majority of the locomotives and coaches had become obsolete, therefore maintenance costs also increased. The aim was to reduce FA's deficit previous to a major restructuring of the company.[9]

With the railway network's chronic deficit having risen to US$355 million per year (about US$1 million per day), the National Congress adopted Law 23,696 (named Ley de Reforma del Estado) which began the privatisation process in 1989.[1]

The law allowed president Menem to declare a state of emergency over any state-owned company with the objective to proceed to a privatisation or closure of that company. In November 1989, Menem pronounced his famous threat to any rail workers contemplating strike action: "Ramal que para, ramal que cierra" ("A line that goes on strike is a line that will be closed").[10][11]

Freight services

edit
 
Ferrosur Roca was granted Roca Railway
 
Nuevo Central Argentino took over Mitre Railway
 
Ferroexpreso Pampeano operated Sarmiento Railway
 
América Latina Logística worked on Urquiza and San Martín networks

Although FA supported the idea of operating the freight line in competition with private companies, the Ministry of Public Works (assisted by the World Bank) excluded FA from the activity, allowing only private concessionaires to operate the lines. In 1990 a program of restructuring was signed by FA, the Ministry and the World Bank. That agreement was the first official document to suggest the possibility to exclude FA from the operation of public transport.[12]

The government granted concessions for a term of 30 years, extendable to 10 years. It was also established that investments made by private operators became property of the state when the contract of concession finished. The concessionaire only kept the rolling stock or other goods acquired during the term of concession.[2]

For freight transport, the government established zones of interest according to traffic. The first section was Rosario–Bahía Blanca with a traffic estimated in 2,000,000 tons per year along its 5,300-km length. The second section was the Urquiza Railway with 1,200,000 tons per year along a length of 2,700 km. The third section was Mitre Railway with 2,500,000 tons (also considering the possibility of passenger services) along a length of 4,800 km. The San Martín Railway was included as the fourth section, with a length of 4,700 km.[2]

The majority of Roca Railway was granted in concession to Ferrosur Roca, property of Loma Negra, the largest cement producer in Argentina. The San Martín was granted to Buenos Aires al Pacífico S.A., while Sarmiento was granted to Ferroexpreso Pampeano (owned by Techint), Urquiza to Ferrocarril Mesopotámico, and Mitre to Nuevo Central Argentino.[2]

Only the Belgrano Railway freight service remained under the control of the state due to lack of interest from private investors. Nevertheless, the railway would be granted to Belgrano Cargas S.A., a consortium established by the railway union Unión Ferroviaria in 1999. That same year, Brazilian company América Latina Logística (ALL) took over the Urquiza and San Martín lines, replacing Ferrocarril Mesopotámico and BAP respectively.

Freight services were granted in concession as follows:[13]

Freight services privatisation
Concessionaire Railway/s Gauge (mm) Length (km) Period
Ferroexpreso Pampeano Sarmiento, Roca[a] 1,676 5,094 1991–2022
Nuevo Central Argentino Mitre 1,676 4,900 1992–2022
Ferrosur Roca Roca 1,676 3,145 1993–2023
Buenos Aires al Pacifíco[b] San Martín 1,676 5,690 1993–1999
Mesopotámico General Urquiza Urquiza 1,435 2,704 1993–1999
América Latina Logística Urquiza 1,435 2,704 1999–2013
San Martín 1,676 5,690 1999–2013
Belgrano Cargas[c] Belgrano 1,000 9,860 1999–2013
  1. ^ Only the Rosario and Puerto Belgrano line.[14]
  2. ^ Not to be confused with the British-owned company Buenos Aires and Pacific Railway, the original concessionary and builder of the line that had been awarded concession in 1872.[15]
  3. ^ Taken over by state-owned Belgrano Cargas y Logística in 2013.

Passenger services

edit

Commuter rail (Buenos Aires)

edit
 
A Metropolitano train in La Plata
 
TBA operated Mitre and Sarmiento lines
 
Ferrovías train at Grand Bourg
 
Buenos Aires Underground unit
 
Ferrocentral ran trains to Tucumán
 
Tren de las Sierras served by Ferrocentral
 
Ferrobaires was created by the government of Buenos Aires
 
The Southern Fuegian Railway was revived in 1994

In March 1991 the government separated the urban passenger rail services and metro operating within the city of Buenos Aires from the rest of the rail network, and to this end created the holding company Ferrocarriles Metropolitanos S.A. (FEMESA). Whilst the freight concessionaires were expected to make a profit, it was recognized that the operation of these services would require public subsidy. Concessions were granted to the bidder who would require the lowest subsidy. Four companies bid successfully for the seven lines originally operated by the six divisions of Ferrocarriles Argentinos, together with the Subte, as shown below:[2]

  • Note: only concessionaires from the original privatisation process started in 1993 are listed.
Passenger services privatisation
Concessionaire Line/s Gauge (mm) Length (km) Period
Metrovías Urquiza 1,435 26 1994–present
Subte 1,435 44 1994–present
Metropolitano San Martín 1,676 55 1994–2007
Roca 1,676 252 1995–2007
Belgrano Sur 1,000 58 1994–2007
Ferrovías Belgrano Norte 1,000 52 1994–present
Trenes de Buenos Aires Mitre 1,676 182 1995–2012
Sarmiento 1,676 167 1995–2012
Tren de la Costa [a] Mitre 1,435 15,5 1995–2013
  1. ^ Taken over by Trenes Argentinos Operadora Ferroviaria when contracts of concession were revoked or expired.

The concessions were mainly for 10 years, with an optional 10-year extension, except for the Metro and the Línea Urquiza which were for an initial term of 20 years. As in the case of the freight concessions, the government maintained ownership of the assets, whilst the concessionaires undertook the operation of their services as described in their original bids. Maximum fares were set by the government but were subject to automatic increases according to service quality and the prevailing rate of inflation. Financial penalties would be levied if agreed levels of service were not achieved.[2]

In spite of these companies receiving large government subsidies,[16] the services operated by Metropolitano deteriorated to a point where the concession for the operation of Línea San Martín was revoked in 2004 and concessions for the operation of the other two lines by the company were revoked in 2007.[17][18][19][20] All three lines were subsequently operated by transitional private consortium UGOFE.[21]

Trenes de Buenos Aires operated the Mitre and Sarmiento lines until the concession was revoked after the Once rail disaster on February 22, 2012, at Once Station, Buenos Aires, in which 51 people died and at least 703 people were injured,[22] TBA was placed under federal intervention on February 28; its concessions to operate the Mitre and Sarmiento lines were ultimately revoked on May 24.[23] After the cancellation of the contact, both lines were taken over by transitional consortium Unidad de Gestión Operativa Mitre Sarmiento (UGOMS). Metrovías took over the operation of the Buenos Aires Subte, the Buenos Aires Premetro, and the Urquiza Line in 1994, and established an earlier closing time of 23:00 on all three systems in order to conduct extensive maintenance and reconstruction, which was retained even after the reconstruction was completed.[24] Numerous proposals to extend the operating hours of all three Metrovías-operated services have failed.[25]

When UGOFE and UGOMS were dissolved, Corredores Ferroviarios (a company part of Grupo Roggio, which also owns Metrovías) and Argentren took over the Mitre/San Martín and Belgrano Sur/Roca lines, respectively.[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The company operated both lines until the government rescinded the agreement with the company in March 2015.[33][34][35][36]

Apart from Corredores Ferroviarios, other private company, Argentren S.A., was granted concession to operate the Roca and Belgrano Sur lines.[34][35][36] The contract was also revoked by the government in March 2015.[1]

Other rail services

edit

On 20 May 1992 the government announced that all inter-city passenger services, other than Buenos Aires to Mar del Plata, would be discontinued on January 1, 1993, unless provincial authorities either agreed to assume responsibility for them or selected a private concessionaire to operate them on their behalf.[2]

Provincial governments that took over the services to avoid closures were:

On the other hand, La Trochita was never privatised and closed in 1992 due to the lack of interest of private investors. Nevertheless, the line would be later reopened, being currently cooperatively operated by the governments of Río Negro and Chubut provinces.[41]

Long-distance and tourist services granted to private companies are listed below:

Other passenger services privatisation
Concessionaire Division Gauge (mm) Length (km) Period
Tucumán Ferrocarriles Retiro–Tucumán 1,676 1,260 1997–2000
Ferrocentral [a] 2004–2014
Ferrocarriles Mediterráneos Córdoba–Villa María 1,676 150 1992–2004
Ferrocentral Tren de las Sierras 1,000 150 2007–13
Servicios Ferroviarios Patagónico Viedma–Bariloche 1,676 826 1993–?
Trenes Especiales Argentinos F. Lacroze–Posadas 1,435 1,060 2003–2011
(unknown) Southern Fueguian [b] 0,500 7 1994–present
(unknown) Tren a las Nubes [c] 1,000 217 1991–2005
EcoTren 2005–2014
  1. ^ Taken over by Trenes Argentinos Operadora Ferroviaria when contracts of concession were revoked or expired.
  2. ^ The Southern Fueguian was not included into any railway division after 1948 nationalisation. It remained closed from 1952 until 1994 when the SF was granted in concession to a private company that completely rebuilt the line.
  3. ^ Taken over by the Government of Salta after the last concession was revoked.[42]

Bibliography

edit
  • Reshaping Argentina's Railways by Jorge H. Kogan & Louis S. Thompson – Japan Railway Review

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d "Infoleg". 1 November 2013. Archived from the original on 1 November 2013. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h La Privatización de los ferrocarriles en Argentina: el nuevo rol del Estado at the University of Buenos Aires Digital Library
  3. ^ "El servicio ferroviario argentino de las últimas dos décadas, el antes y después de las privatizaciones (página 2)". Monografias.com (in Spanish). 13 March 2021. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  4. ^ sabrinaramirez (24 July 2013). "Privatización de los ferrocarriles: «Ramal que para, ramal que cierra»". Contra Molinos de Sortilegios (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  5. ^ "COMO PERDIMOS EL FERROCARRIL ARGENTINO - NOTA - ancaloo.com.ar - San Gregorio. Santa Fe. Argentina". www.ancaloo.com.ar. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  6. ^ "Noticias económicas y cotización del dólar | ámbito.com". www.ambito.com. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  7. ^ Grigera, Noelia Barral. "Con sólo dos votos en contra, el Senado sancionó la ley de estatización de los trenes". www.cronista.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  8. ^ Crónica del día que Perón anunció la compra de los trenes: el apuro inglés de vender “esos fierros viejos” by Adrián Pignatelli on Infobae, 1 Mar 2024
  9. ^ La historia de un desgüace on Página/12, 2 Jul 2012
  10. ^ Clarín.com (25 May 1997). "Ramal que cierra, pueblo que muere". Clarín (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  11. ^ "Página/12 :: El país :: De la resistencia a la recuperación". www.pagina12.com.ar (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  12. ^ "Welcome to World Bank Intranet". message.worldbank.org. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  13. ^ "Historia de los Ferrocarriles en Argentina". 23 December 2011. Archived from the original on 23 December 2011. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  14. ^ "Mapa de la red - FEPSA", CNRT website (Archive)
  15. ^ British Railways in Argentina 1857-1914: A Case Study of Foreign Investment by Colin M. Lewis - Athlone Press (for the Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London, 1983)
  16. ^ "Página/12 :: El país :: Los que viven del subsidio". www.pagina12.com.ar (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  17. ^ "Hubo numerosos alertas que no se atendieron", La Nación, 17 May 2007
  18. ^ ""Metropolitano, una compañía con reiteradas sanciones", Terra, 16 May 2007". Archived from the original on 19 March 2014. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
  19. ^ Clarín.com (16 January 2007). "Protestaron contra el ex Roca en Constitución". Clarín (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  20. ^ "Página/12 :: El país :: "Lo que pasó se veía venir"". www.pagina12.com.ar. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  21. ^ "La UGOFE se hará cargo de los servicios de las dos líneas ferroviarias". www.laprensa.com.ar. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  22. ^ "Argentina train crash in Buenos Aires kills dozens". BBC News. Retrieved 22 February 2012.
  23. ^ "Finalmente, el Gobierno le sacó las concesiones del Sarmiento y del Mitre a TBA". Clarín. 24 May 2012.
  24. ^ "Presentan proyecto para que el Subte funcione durante la noche". enelSubte (in Spanish). Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  25. ^ "Reúnen firmas para apoyar el proyecto de ampliación del horario del Subte". enelSubte.com (in European Spanish). 25 August 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2016.
  26. ^ Roggio y EMEPA se repartirán el manejo de cuatro ferrocarriles clarin.com
  27. ^ Trenes cero kilómetro después de cincuenta años/ Cambios Recientes pagina12.com.ar
  28. ^ "Trenes: le dan a Roggio el Mitre y el San Martín y a Emepa, el Roca y el Belgrano Sur", La Nación, 12 Feb 2014
  29. ^ "Las privadas volverán a operar la mayoría de las líneas ferroviarias", Clarín, 12 Feb 2014
  30. ^ "El Gobierno estableció un nuevo régimen de operaciones de las líneas ferroviarias", Telam, 12 Feb 2014
  31. ^ "De a uno por línea, para mejor control", Página 12, 12 Feb 2014
  32. ^ "Metrovías operará las líneas Mitre y San Martín", En el Subte, 12 Feb 2014
  33. ^ "Ya está lista la ley que prevé más control estatal sobre los trenes", Clarín, 5 Mar 2015
  34. ^ a b "Estado rescindió contrato de trenes a privados y avisó que no pagará indemnizaciones", Ambito Financiero, 2 Mar 2015
  35. ^ a b "Buenos Aires commuter routes renationalised", Railway Gazette, 3 Mar 2015
  36. ^ a b Resolution N° 171/2015 - Official Bulletin of Argentina
  37. ^ Ferrobaires: a 5 años del cierre, ¿qué trenes conectan a la provincia? on Energiaytransporte.com.ar, 7 Jul 2021
  38. ^ Crea "servicios ferroviarios del Chaco S.A." (SEFECHA)" – Ley 4.282
  39. ^ "Trenes en el recuerdo" on Haciendo Vía, 17 Sep 2009
  40. ^ "Avanza la reactivación del Tren Patagónico", Minuto Uno, 16 Apr 2014
  41. ^ La Trochita, monumento histórico nacional on PATAGONIA ANDINA. 25 May 2023
  42. ^ "Tras las fallas de seguridad, Salta estatizó el Tren a las Nubes", Infobae 23 Jul 2014
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Railway_privatisation_in_Argentina&oldid=1236181251"