Reading for special needs

Reading for special needs has become an area of interest as the understanding of reading has improved. Teaching children with special needs how to read was not historically pursued under the assumption of the reading readiness model[1] that a reader must learn to read in a hierarchical manner such that one skill must be mastered before learning the next skill (e.g. a child might be expected to learn the names of the letters in the alphabet in the correct order before being taught how to read his or her name).[2] This approach often led to teaching sub-skills of reading in a decontextualized manner, preventing students with special needs from progressing to more advanced literacy lessons and subjecting them to repeated age-inappropriate instruction (e.g. singing the alphabet song).

During the 1970s, the education system shifted to targeting functional skills that were age-appropriate for people with special needs.[3][4] This led to teaching sight words that were viewed as necessary for participation in the school and community (e.g. exit, danger, poison, go). This approach was an improvement upon previous practices, but it limited the range of literacy skills that people with special needs developed.[2]

A newer model for reading development, the "emergent literacy" or "early literacy" model, purports that children begin reading from birth and that learning to read is an interactive process based on children's exposure to literate activities. It is under this new model that children with developmental disabilities and special needs have been considered to be able to learn to read.[5][6]

Populations at increased risk

edit

Children with language difficulties that fall below expectations for their chronological age are at increased risk for reading disorders or difficulties that can occur early in preschool and continue throughout development.[7] Children with other disabilities, such as developmental disability, autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, fragile X syndrome, and cerebral palsy, can also have language impairments that raise the risk of developing reading problems.

Down syndrome

edit

It has been found true for children with intellectual disabilities, such as children with Down syndrome, that phonological awareness skills are often deficient and require targeted teaching.[8] For example, studies have found that children with Down syndrome show deficits in phonological awareness, and though they can develop such skills, often rely on sight word vocabulary knowledge rather than phonological awareness skills to decode words.[9] Given this, it is recommended that phonological awareness skills be taught in a systematic manner with explicit instruction of how to use these skills when reading.

Autism

edit

Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been identified as having particular difficulties with reading comprehension despite normal decoding abilities,.[10][11][12] Historically, those individuals who are especially good at decoding but have poor comprehension are considered to have hyperlexia.[13] Not all individuals with autism, however, are poor comprehenders as there is a wide range of abilities in children on the spectrum.[14] Despite the type of reader an individual with autism might be, individuals should be given the opportunity to learn to read.[15] Very few studies have examined the effectiveness of interventions for reading for individuals with ASD.[16] Using computer-assisted instruction to implement programs for individuals with ASD that target skills in decoding could be an effective way to help improve these skills in these individuals.[17][18][19][20] Procedural facilitation tasks such as prereading questions, anaphoric cuing, or a cloze task helped to improve reading comprehension with the anaphoric cuing task being the most effective task.[10]

Cerebral palsy

edit

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) may or may not have motor speech impairments and/or language impairments,[21] which can lead to reading difficulties. Often children with CP can be classified as having severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI), but children with other disorders can fall into this category as well. Children with SSPI can be at increased risk for reading difficulties not only because they may have language impairments, but also because they can have limited literary experiences and limited reading instruction.[22][23] Additionally, parents and teachers may have low expectations of the child's ability to become a reader, which may influence experiences with text and impact literacy instruction.[24] Assistive technology (also Alternative and Augmentative Communication devices; AAC) can be used to overcome physical barriers to manipulating books, and to augment speech motor and language difficulties (e.g., type, or select symbols to identify rhyming words), and cognitive impairments (to provide needed support required for target skill acquisition) (Copeland & Keef, 2007, see chapter 9).[2] Of course, access to assistive devices is not sufficient for reading development. Appropriate reading instruction is required (e.g., instruction in phonological awareness skills, phonemic awareness skills, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, text comprehension, and book conventions), regularly conducted story reading sessions, constructive AT/AAC use to target literacy skills, high expectations of student literacy achievement, and text-rich environments have been found to be important for developing literacy skills in children with CP.[22]

Interventions

edit

Classroom teachers[25] are expected to provide the primary source of reading instruction for most students. Special education teachers[26] may supplement the classroom instruction in reading and writing skills based on the independent performance of their students. Other professionals including a reading specialist,[27] a speech-language pathologist,[28] an educational or school psychologist,[29] and an occupational therapist[30] may also provide reading and writing support to individuals with reading and writing difficulties.

People with severe speech difficulties can use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. AAC proponents insist that AAC enables such individuals to express needs, wants, and ideas.[31] Evidence indicates that few AAC users are able to progress to a second grade literacy level and many do not become conventionally "literate" at all.[32]

References

edit
  1. ^ van Kleeck A, Schuele CM (November 2010). "Historical perspectives on literacy in early childhood". Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 19 (4): 341–55. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0038). PMID 20581109. S2CID 44839260.
  2. ^ a b c Elizabeth B. Keefe; Susan R. Glaser; Susan Copeland; Elizabeth B. Keefe (2007). Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities. Paul H. Brookes Publishing. ISBN 978-1-55766-837-0. OCLC 77011619.
  3. ^ Browder, D.; Flowers, C.; Ahlgrim-Delzell, L.; Karvonen, M.; Spooner, F.; Algozzine, R. (2004). "The Alignment of Alternate Assessment Content with Academic and Functional Curricula". The Journal of Special Education. 37 (4): 211–223. doi:10.1177/00224669040370040101. ISSN 0022-4669. S2CID 73640629.
  4. ^ Brown, L.; Branston, M. B.; Hamre-Nietupski, S.; Pumpian, I.; Certo, N.; Gruenewald, L. (1979). "A Strategy for Developing Chronological-Age-Appropriate and Functional Curricular Content for Severely Handicapped Adolescents and Young Adults". The Journal of Special Education. 13 (1): 81–90. doi:10.1177/002246697901300113. ISSN 0022-4669. S2CID 145477722.
  5. ^ K.A. Erickson (2000). "All children are ready to learn: An emergent versus readiness perspective in early literacy assessment". Seminars in Speech and Language. 21 (3): 193–202, quiz 202-3. doi:10.1055/s-2000-13193. PMID 10958428. S2CID 19651351.
  6. ^ D.A. Koppenhaver & K.A. Erickson (2003). "Natural emergent literacy supports for preschoolers with autism and severe communication impairments". Topics in Language Disorders. 23 (4): 283. doi:10.1097/00011363-200310000-00004. S2CID 145683425.
  7. ^ L.E. Skibbe; K.J. Grimm; T.L. Stanton-Chapman; L.M. Justice; K.L. Pence & R.P. Bowles (2008). Reading Trajectories of Children with Language Difficulties from Preschool Through Fifth Grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools.
  8. ^ E. Kay-Raining Bird; P.L. Cleave & L. McConnel (2000). Reading and Phonological Awareness in Children with Down Syndrome: A Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.
  9. ^ M.J. Snowling; C. Hulme & R.C. Mercer (2002). A Deficit in Rime Awareness in Children with Down Syndrome. Reading and Writing.
  10. ^ a b N. O’Connor, and P.D. Klein (2004). Exploration of Strategies for Facilitating the Reading Comprehension of High-Functioning Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
  11. ^ N. O’Connor, and B. Hermelin (1994). Two Autistic Savant Readers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
  12. ^ S.V. Huemer & V. Mann (2010). "A comprehensive profile of decoding and comprehension in autism spectrum disorders". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 40 (4): 485–93. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0892-3. PMC 2837163. PMID 19915968.
  13. ^ K. Nation (1999). "Reading skills in hyperlexia: A developmental perspective". Psychological Bulletin. 125 (3): 338–55. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.338. PMID 10349355.
  14. ^ K. Nation; P. Clarke; B. Wright & C. Williams (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
  15. ^ P. Mirenda (2003). "He's not really a reader...": Perspectives on supporting literacy development in individuals with autism. Topics in Language Disorders.
  16. ^ K.J. Whalon; S. Al Otaiba & M.E. Delano (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities.
  17. ^ M. Heimann; K.E. Nelson; T. Tjus & C. Gillberg (1995). Increasing reading and communication skills in children with autism through an interactive multimedia computer program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
  18. ^ C. Basil & S. Reyes (2003). Acquisition of literacy skills by children with severe disability. Child Language Teaching and Therapy.
  19. ^ T.Tjus, M. Heimann & K.E. Nelson (1998). Gains in literacy through the use of a specially developed multimedia computer strategy. Autism.
  20. ^ M.B. Coleman-Martin; K.W. Heller; D.F. Cihak; K.L. Irvine (2005). Using computer assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities.
  21. ^ K.C. Hustad; K. Gorton & J. Lee (2010). "Classification of Speech and Language Profiles in 4-year-old Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Prospective Preliminary Study". Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 53 (6): 1496–513. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0176). PMC 2962882. PMID 20643795.
  22. ^ a b D.G. Mike (1993). Literacy and cerebral palsy: factors influencing literacy learning in a self-contained setting. Journal of Literacy Research.
  23. ^ D.A. Koppenhaver & D.E. Yoder (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): what is and what might be. Journal of Literacy Research.
  24. ^ J. Light & D. McNaughton (1993). Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): the expectations and priorities of parents and teachers. Topics in Language Disorders.
  25. ^ "NEA'S Official Reading Policy". Retrieved 2011-12-20.
  26. ^ "Highly Qualified Teachers". Retrieved 2011-12-20.
  27. ^ "Role of the reading specialist position statement". International Reading Association. January 2000. Archived from the original on 2012-01-03.
  28. ^ "Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology". American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2007-09-04.[permanent dead link]
  29. ^ "NASP model: 10 domains of practice". National Association of School Psychologists. 2010.
  30. ^ "Handwriting". The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Retrieved 2011-12-20.
  31. ^ Light, J., & Kelford Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25 p. 10.
  32. ^ Janet M. Sturm Associate Professor, Stephanie A. Spadorcia, James W. Cunningham, Kathleen S. Cali, Amy Staples, Karen Erickson, David E. Yoder & David A. Koppenhaver (2006) What happens to reading between first and third grade? Implications for students who use AAC, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22:1, 21-36 p. 21, DOI: 10.1080/07434610500243826
edit

^ Anderson, Mark, The WordPen Learning System, Spring 2004