Regge–Wheeler–Zerilli equations

In general relativity, Regge–Wheeler–Zerilli equations are a pair of equations that describes gravitational perturbations of a Schwarzschild black hole, named after Tullio Regge, John Archibald Wheeler and Frank J. Zerilli.[1][2] The perturbations of a Schwarzchild metric is classified into two types, namely, axial and polar perturbations, a terminology introduced by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. Axial perturbations induce frame dragging by imparting rotations to the black hole and change sign when azimuthal direction is reversed, whereas polar perturbations do not impart rotations and do not change sign under the reversal of azimuthal direction. The equation for axial perturbations is called Regge–Wheeler equation and the equation governing polar perturbations is called Zerilli equation.

Red lines: Regge-Wheeler potentials. Blue lines: Zerilli potentials

The equations take the same form as the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation. The equations read as[3]

where characterizes the polar perturbations and the axial perturbations. Here is the tortoise coordinate (we set ), belongs to the Schwarzschild coordinates , is the Schwarzschild radius and represents the time frequency of the perturbations appearing in the form . The Regge–Wheeler potential and Zerilli potential are respectively given by

where and characterizes the eigenmode for the coordinate. For gravitational perturbations, the modes are irrelevant because they do not evolve with time. Physically gravitational perturbations with (monopole) mode represents a change in the black hole mass, whereas the (dipole) mode corresponds to a shift in the location and value of the black hole's angular momentum. The shape of above potentials are exhibited in the figure.

Remember that in the tortoise coordinate, denotes event horizon and is equivalent to i.e., to distances far away from the back hole. The potentials are short ranged as they decay faster than ; as we have and as , we have Consequently, the asymptotic behaviour of the solutions for is

Relations between the two problems

edit

In 1975, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and Steven Detweiler discovered a one-to-one mapping between the two equations, leading to a consequence that the spectrum corresponding to both potentials are identical.[4] The two potentials can also be written as

 

The relations between   and   are given by[3]

 

Reflection and transmission coefficients

edit
 
Reflection coefficients due to Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli potentials

Here   is always positive and the problem is one of reflection and transmission of waves incident from   to  . The problem is essentially the same as that of a reflection and transmission problem by a potential barrier in quantum mechanics. Let the incident wave with unit amplitude be  , then the asymptotic behaviours of the solution are given by

 
 

where   and   are respectively are the reflection and transmission amplitudes. In the second equation, we have imposed the physical requirement that no waves emerge from the event horizon.

The reflection and transmission coefficients are thus defined as

 

subjected to the condition   Because of the inherent connection between the two equations as outlined in the previous section, it turns out[3]

 

and thus consequently, since   and   differ only in their phases, we get

 

It is clear from the figure for the reflection coefficient that small-frequency perturbations are readily reflected by the black hole whereas large-frequecny ones are absorbed by the black hole.

Quasi-normal modes

edit

Quasi-normal modes correspond to pure tones of the black hole. It describes for arbitrary, but small, perturbations such as an object falling into the black hole, accretion of matter surrounding it, last stage of slightly aspherical collapse etc. Unlike the reflection and transmission coefficient problem, quasi-normal modes are characterised by complex-valued  's with the convention  . The required boundary conditions are

 
 

indicating that we have purely outgoing waves with amplitude   and purely ingoing waves at the horizon.

The problem becomes an eigenvalue problem. The quasi-normal modes are of damping type in time, although these waves diverge in space as   (this is due to the implicit assumption that the perturbation in quasi-normal modes is 'infinite' in the remote past)[3]. Again because of the relation mentioned between the two problem, the spectrum of   and   are identical and thus it enough to consider the spectrum of   The problem is simplified by introducing[4]

 

The nonlinear eigenvalue problem is given by

 

The solution is found to exist only for a discrete set of values of  [5] This equation also implies the identity

 

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Regge, T., & Wheeler, J. A. (1957). Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity. Physical Review, 108(4), 1063.
  2. ^ Zerilli, F. J. (1970). Effective potential for even-parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations. Physical Review Letters, 24(13), 737.
  3. ^ a b c d Chandrasekhar, S.(1983). The mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford university press.
  4. ^ a b Chandrasekhar, S., & Detweiler, S. (1975). The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 344(1639), 441-452.
  5. ^ Nollert, H. P. (1993). Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes: The determination of quasinormal frequencies with very large imaginary parts. Physical Review D, 47(12), 5253.