Regular distribution (economics)

Regularity, sometimes called Myerson's regularity, is a property of probability distributions used in auction theory and revenue management. Examples of distributions that satisfy this condition include Gaussian, uniform, and exponential; some power law distributions also satisfy regularity.[1] Distributions that satisfy the regularity condition are often referred to as "regular distributions".

Definitions

edit

Two equivalent definitions of regularity appear in the literature. Both are defined for continuous distributions, although analogs for discrete distributions have also been considered.[2]

Concavity of revenue in quantile space

edit

Consider a seller auctioning a single item to a buyer with random value  . For any price   set by the seller, the buyer will buy the item if  . The seller's expected revenue is  . We define the revenue function   as follows:   is the expected revenue the seller would obtain by choosing   such that  . In other words,   is the revenue that can be obtained by selling the item with (ex-ante) probability  . Finally, we say that a distribution is regular if   is a concave function.[3]

Monotone virtual valuation

edit

For a cumulative distribution function   and corresponding probability density function  , the virtual valuation of the agent is defined as

 

The valuation distribution is said to be regular if   is a monotone non-decreasing function.[3]

Applications

edit

Myerson's auction

edit

An important special case[note 1] considered by Myerson (1981) is the problem of a seller auctioning a single item to one or more buyers whose valuations for the item are drawn from independent distributions. Myerson showed that the problem of the seller truthfully maximizing her profit is equivalent to maximizing the "virtual social welfare", i.e. the expected virtual valuation of the bidder who receives the item.

When the bidders valuations distributions are regular, the virtual valuations are monotone in the real valuations, which implies that the transformation to virtual valuations is incentive compatible. Thus a Vickrey auction can be used to maximize the virtual social welfare (with additional reserve prices to guarantee non-negative virtual valuations). When the distributions are irregular, a more complicated ironing procedure is used to transform them into regular distributions.[4]

Prior-independent mechanism design

edit

Myerson's auction mentioned above is optimal if the seller has an accurate prior, i.e. a good estimate of the distribution of valuations that bidders can have for the item. Obtaining such a good prior may be highly non-trivial, or even impossible. Prior-independent mechanism design seeks to design mechanisms for sellers (and agents in general) who do not have access to such a prior.

Regular distributions are a common assumption in prior-independent mechanism design. For example, the seminal Bulow & Klemperer (1996) proved that if bidders valuations for a single item are regular and i.i.d. (or identical and affiliated), the revenue obtained from selling with an English auction to   bidders dominates the revenue obtained from selling with any mechanism (in particular, Myerson's optimal mechanism) to   bidders.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Myerson distinguishes between "preference uncertainty", which we expect to be independent for each bidder, and "quality uncertainty", which is treated in a more general model where one bidder's private information affects the valuation of other bidders, and even the value of the item to the seller.

References

edit
  1. ^ Tim Roughgarden (2014). "Approximately optimal mechanism design: motivation, examples, and lessons learned". SIGecom Exchanges. 13 (2): 4–20. arXiv:1406.6773. Bibcode:2014arXiv1406.6773R. doi:10.1145/2728732.2728733. S2CID 482665.
  2. ^ Edith Elkind (2007). Designing and learning optimal finite support auctions. SODA 2007. SIAM. pp. 736–745. ISBN 978-0-898716-24-5.
  3. ^ a b Hartline, Jason (2012). "3.3". Mechanism Design and Approximation.
  4. ^ Myerson, Roger (February 1981). "Optimal Auction Design". Mathematics of Operations Research. 6 (1). INFORMS: 58–73. doi:10.1287/moor.6.1.58. S2CID 12282691.

Sources

edit