Restricted Lie algebra

In mathematics, a restricted Lie algebra (or p-Lie algebra) is a Lie algebra over a field of characteristic p>0 together with an additional "pth power" operation. Most naturally occurring Lie algebras in characteristic p come with this structure, because the Lie algebra of a group scheme over a field of characteristic p is restricted.

Definition

edit

Let   be a Lie algebra over a field k of characteristic p>0. The adjoint representation of   is defined by   for  . A p-mapping on   is a function from   to itself,  , satisfying:[1]

  •   for all  ,
  •   for all   and  ,
  •   for all  , where   is   times the coefficient of   in the formal expression  .

Nathan Jacobson (1937) defined a restricted Lie algebra over k to be a Lie algebra over k together with a p-mapping. A Lie algebra is said to be restrictable if it has at least one p-mapping. By the first property above, in a restricted Lie algebra, the derivation   of   is inner for each  . In fact, a Lie algebra is restrictable if and only if the derivation   of   is inner for each  .[2]

For example:

  • For p = 2, a restricted Lie algebra has  .
  • For p = 3, a restricted Lie algebra has  . Since   in a field of characteristic 3, this can be rewritten as  .

Examples

edit

For an associative algebra A over a field k of characteristic p>0, the commutator   and the p-mapping   make A into a restricted Lie algebra.[1] In particular, taking A to be the ring of n x n matrices shows that the Lie algebra   of n x n matrices over k is a restricted Lie algebra, with the p-mapping being the pth power of a matrix. This "explains" the definition of a restricted Lie algebra: the complicated formula for   is needed to express the pth power of the sum of two matrices over k,  , given that X and Y typically do not commute.

Let A be an algebra over a field k. (Here A is a possibly non-associative algebra.) Then the derivations of A over k form a Lie algebra  , with the Lie bracket being the commutator,  . When k has characteristic p>0, then iterating a derivation p times yields a derivation, and this makes   into a restricted Lie algebra.[1] If A has finite dimension as a vector space, then   is the Lie algebra of the automorphism group scheme of A over k; that indicates why spaces of derivations are a natural way to construct Lie algebras.

Let G be a group scheme over a field k of characteristic p>0, and let   be the Zariski tangent space at the identity element of G. Then   is a restricted Lie algebra over k.[3] This is essentially a special case of the previous example. Indeed, each element X of   determines a left-invariant vector field on G, and hence a left-invariant derivation on the ring of regular functions on G. The pth power of this derivation is again a left-invariant derivation, hence the derivation associated to an element   of  . Conversely, every restricted Lie algebra of finite dimension over k is the Lie algebra of a group scheme. In fact,   is an equivalence of categories from finite group schemes G of height at most 1 over k (meaning that   for all regular functions f on G that vanish at the identity element) to restricted Lie algebras of finite dimension over k.[4]

In a sense, this means that Lie theory is less powerful in positive characteristic than in characteristic zero. In characteristic p>0, the multiplicative group   (of dimension 1) and its finite subgroup scheme   have the same restricted Lie algebra, namely the vector space k with the p-mapping  . More generally, the restricted Lie algebra of a group scheme G over k only depends on the kernel of the Frobenius homomorphism on G, which is a subgroup scheme of height at most 1.[5] For another example, the Lie algebra of the additive group   is the vector space k with p-mapping equal to zero. The corresponding Frobenius kernel is the subgroup scheme  

For a scheme X over a field k of characteristic p>0, the space   of vector fields on X is a restricted Lie algebra over k. (If X is affine, so that   for a commutative k-algebra A, this is the Lie algebra of derivations of A over k. In general, one can informally think of   as the Lie algebra of the automorphism group of X over k.) An action of a group scheme G on X determines a homomorphism   of restricted Lie algebras.[6]

The choice of a p-mapping

edit

Given two p-mappings on a Lie algebra  , their difference is a p-linear function from   to the center  . (p-linearity means that   and  .) Thus, if the center of   is zero, then   is a restricted Lie algebra in at most one way.[2] In particular, this comment applies to any simple Lie algebra of characteristic p>0.

The restricted enveloping algebra

edit

The functor that takes an associative algebra A over k to A as a restricted Lie algebra has a left adjoint  , called the restricted enveloping algebra. To construct this, let   be the universal enveloping algebra of   over k (ignoring the p-mapping of  ). Let I be the two-sided ideal generated by the elements   for  ; then the restricted enveloping algebra is the quotient ring  . It satisfies a form of the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem: if   is a basis for   as a k-vector space, then a basis for   is given by all ordered products   with   for each j. In particular, the map   is injective, and if   has dimension n as a vector space, then   has dimension   as a vector space.[7]

A restricted representation V of a restricted Lie algebra   is a representation of   as a Lie algebra such that   for all   and  . Restricted representations of   are equivalent to modules over the restricted enveloping algebra.

Classification of simple Lie algebras

edit

The simple Lie algebras of finite dimension over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero were classified by Wilhelm Killing and Élie Cartan in the 1880s and 1890s, using root systems. Namely, every simple Lie algebra is of type An, Bn, Cn, Dn, E6, E7, E8, F4, or G2.[8] (For example, the simple Lie algebra of type An is the Lie algebra   of (n+1) x (n+1) matrices of trace zero.)

In characteristic p>0, the classification of simple algebraic groups is the same as in characteristic zero. Their Lie algebras are simple in most cases, and so there are simple Lie algebras An, Bn, Cn, Dn, E6, E7, E8, F4, G2, called (in this context) the classical simple Lie algebras. (Because they come from algebraic groups, the classical simple Lie algebras are restricted.) Surprisingly, there are also many other finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras in characteristic p>0. In particular, there are the simple Lie algebras of Cartan type, which are finite-dimensional analogs of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras in characteristic zero studied by Cartan. Namely, Cartan studied the Lie algebra of vector fields on a smooth manifold of dimension n, or the subalgebra of vector fields that preserve a volume form, a symplectic form, or a contact structure. In characteristic p>0, the simple Lie algebras of Cartan type include both restrictable and non-restrictable examples.[9]

Richard Earl Block and Robert Lee Wilson (1988) classified the restricted simple Lie algebras over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>7. Namely, they are all of classical or Cartan type. Alexander Premet and Helmut Strade (2004) extended the classification to Lie algebras which need not be restricted, and to a larger range of characteristics. (In characteristic 5, Hayk Melikyan found another family of simple Lie algebras.) Namely, every simple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>3 is of classical, Cartan, or Melikyan type.[10]

Jacobson's Galois correspondence

edit

Jacobson's Galois correspondence for purely inseparable field extensions is expressed in terms of restricted Lie algebras.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b c Jacobson (1979), section V.7; Strade & Farnsteiner (1988), section 2.1.
  2. ^ a b Strade & Farnsteiner (1988), section 2.2.
  3. ^ Jantzen (2003), section I.7.10.
  4. ^ Demazure & Gabriel (1970), Proposition II.7.4.1; Jantzen (2003), Example I.8.5.
  5. ^ Jantzen (2003), section I.9.6.
  6. ^ Demazure & Gabriel (1970), Proposition II.7.3.4.
  7. ^ Strade & Farnsteiner (1988), section 2.5.
  8. ^ Jacobson (1979), section IV.6.
  9. ^ Strade (2004), section 4.2; Premet & Strade (2006), section 3.
  10. ^ Strade (2004), p. 7; Premet & Strade (2006), Theorem 7.

References

edit
  • Block, Richard E.; Wilson, Robert Lee (1988), "Classification of the restricted simple Lie algebras", Journal of Algebra, 114 (1): 115–259, doi:10.1016/0021-8693(88)90216-5, ISSN 0021-8693, MR 0931904.
  • Demazure, Michel; Gabriel, Pierre (1970), Groupes algébriques. Tome I: Géométrie algébrique, généralités, groupes commutatifs, Paris: Masson, ISBN 978-2225616662, MR 0302656
  • Jacobson, Nathan (1979) [1962], Lie algebras, Dover Publications, ISBN 0-486-63832-4, MR 0559927
  • Jantzen, Jens Carsten (2003) [1987], Representations of algebraic groups (2nd ed.), American Mathematical Society, ISBN 978-0-8218-3527-2, MR 2015057
  • Premet, Alexander; Strade, Helmut (2006), "Classification of finite dimensional simple Lie algebras in prime characteristics", Representations of algebraic groups, quantum groups, and Lie algebras, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 413, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. 185–214, arXiv:math/0601380, MR 2263096
  • Strade, Helmut; Farnsteiner, Rolf (1988), Modular Lie algebras and their representations, Marcel Dekker, ISBN 0-8247-7594-5, MR 0929682
  • Strade, Helmut (2004), Simple Lie algebras over fields of positive characteristic, vol. 1, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 3-11-014211-2, MR 2059133