Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.

Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 14, 2019; Decided March 4, 2019
Full case name	Rimini Street, Inc., et al. v. Oracle USA, Inc., et al.
Docket no.	17-1625
Citations	586 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 873; 203 L. Ed. 2d 180; 129 U.S.P.Q.2d 1459
Case history
Prior	Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini St., Inc., 209 F. Supp. 3d 1200 (D. Nev. 2016); 879 F.3d 948, 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 2018); cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 52 (2018).
Holding
	A federal district court's discretion to award "full costs" to a party in copyright litigation pursuant to 17 U. S. C. §505 is limited to the six categories specified in the general costs statute codified at 28 U. S. C. §§1821 and 1920.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito; Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan; Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinion
Majority	Kavanaugh, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
	Copyright Act of 1976, Fee Act of 1853

Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc., 586 U.S. ___ (2019), is a 2019 United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Copyright Act's award of "full costs," to a prevailing party in a copyright infringement claim is limited to taxable costs defined by the Fee Act of 1853, rejecting a broader interpretation that permitted fee awards to include litigation expenses outside the statutory schedule of costs.^[1]

The Court cited three prior Supreme Court cases limiting awards to those specified by Congress: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc. (1987), West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey (1991), and Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy (2006).

References

^ Steve Brachmann, Rimini Street v. Oracle USA: Kavanaugh Frowns on Broad Interpretation of 'Full Costs' Under Copyright Act, IP Watchdog, March 4, 2019.

External links

Text of Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc., 586 U.S. ___ (2019) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
SCOTUSblog page
Steve Brachmann, Rimini Street v. Oracle USA: Kavanaugh Frowns on Broad Interpretation of 'Full Costs' Under Copyright Act, IP Watchdog, March 4, 2019

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[1] Steve Brachmann, Rimini Street v. Oracle USA: Kavanaugh Frowns on Broad Interpretation of 'Full Costs' Under Copyright Act, IP Watchdog, March 4, 2019.

[1]

Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 14, 2019 Decided March 4, 2019
Full case name	Rimini Street, Inc., et al. v. Oracle USA, Inc., et al.
Docket no.	17-1625
Citations	586 U.S. ___ (more) 139 S. Ct. 873; 203 L. Ed. 2d 180; 129 U.S.P.Q.2d 1459
Case history
Prior	Oracle USA, Inc. v. Rimini St., Inc., 209 F. Supp. 3d 1200 (D. Nev. 2016); 879 F.3d 948, 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1380 (9th Cir. 2018); cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 52 (2018).
Holding
A federal district court's discretion to award "full costs" to a party in copyright litigation pursuant to 17 U. S. C. §505 is limited to the six categories specified in the general costs statute codified at 28 U. S. C. §§1821 and 1920.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinion
Majority	Kavanaugh, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Copyright Act of 1976, Fee Act of 1853