Rings on Her Fingers is a 1942 American comedy film directed by Rouben Mamoulian for 20th Century Studios and starring Henry Fonda and Gene Tierney.[2][3]

Rings on Her Fingers
Theatrical poster
Directed byRouben Mamoulian
Screenplay byKen Englund
Emeric Pressburger (adaptation) (uncredited)
Story byRobert Pirosh
Joseph Schrank
Produced byMilton Sperling
StarringHenry Fonda
Gene Tierney
Laird Cregar
Spring Byington
CinematographyGeorge Barnes
Edited byBarbara McLean
Music byCyril J. Mockridge
Leigh Harline
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
  • March 20, 1942 (1942-03-20)
Running time
86 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$651,000[1]
Box office$925,300[1]

The film is reminiscent of the 1930s screwball comedies starring Carole Lombard and Jean Arthur, and in particular Paramount's The Lady Eve (1941), also featuring Henry Fonda.[4]

Plot

edit

Susan Miller works as a girdle salesgirl in a large department store. She dreams of living on "the other side", among the rich. An elderly woman, calling herself Mrs. Maybelle Worthington, comes to buy some underwear. She is actually a professional swindler. Her partner Warren meets her at the department store, and reports that her "daughter" (a partner in their schemes) has run away to get married. They notice that Susan resembles the "daughter", and ask her to impersonate the missing girl at their party that evening. Susan sees an opportunity to experience life among the rich, and wear the expensive clothes she could never afford.

From that day on, Susan becomes "Linda Worthington" and accompanies "Mother Worthington" and "Uncle Warren" in their travels. They use her to attract marriageable young rich men, whom they swindle. One day in Southern California, they encounter John Wheeler, and overhear his plan to buy a yacht for $15,000. They take him for a millionaire, and use "Linda" to lure him into one of their swindles. But John is actually an accountant, who has carefully saved the $15,000 out of his limited income. This time Susan/Linda falls in love with the intended victim, and it is hard for them to find their way to happiness.[5][6][7]

Cast

edit

Reception

edit

The film recorded a loss of $14,100.[1]

Retrospective appraisal

edit

Producer Darryl Zanuck informed Mamoulian in writing that he expected the director to create a film that had the look of a high-production "A picture", but rendered on a "B-picture" budget. According to biographer Kurt Jensen, Mamoulian considered it "the least important of my films" and lacking the stylistic elements characteristic of his oeuvre.[8]

Critic Tom Milne concurs, calling the film "a lightweight comedy [and] the only film he ever made in which one could not instantly recognize his hand".[9] Praising Henry Fonda's performance as "brilliant throughout", he notes that "the film is of only marginal interest in Mamoulian’s work".[10]

Film historian Marc Spergel emphatically denies that the film deviates significantly from Mamoulian's other pictures:

The claim that the film is unrepresentative of his body of work is false. While it may not be recognizable Mamoulian at first glance, it is congruent with his body of work…the sexual titillation, wit, sophistication, and fast-pacing in the film are all characteristically Mamoulian.[11]

Spergal adds, "Mamoulian was fortunate in having a true ensemble of accomplished actors who were able to bring their abilities to the film," among these, Fonda, Tierney, Byington and Cregar.[12]

Movie censors were primarily troubled by Mamoulian's failure to depict licentious behavior as deserving of punishment. Gene Tierney's bathing suit scenes and her conduct were deemed offensive because it appears that she is soliciting sex. The names "Betty, Irene and Mabel" were changed "because these were slang terms for contraceptives at the time".[13]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b c Mank, Gregory William (2018). Laird Cregar: A Hollywood Tragedy. McFarland.
  2. ^ Milne, 1969 p. 170-171: Filmography
  3. ^ Spergel, 1993 p. 282-283: Filmography and Stageography
  4. ^ Jensen, 2024 p. 172
  5. ^ Milne, 1969 pp. 135-138: Plot synopsis.
  6. ^ Spergel, 1993 p. 182-183: Plot synopsis
  7. ^ Jensen, 2024 p. 172-173: Plot summary
  8. ^ Jensen, 2024 p. 171-172: “...a slight madcap comedy….”
  9. ^ Milne, 1969 p. 135: “...at best a second-rate Preston Sturges.”
  10. ^ Milne, 1969 p. 138
  11. ^ Spergel, 1993 p. 182-183
  12. ^ Spergel, 1993 p. 184:
  13. ^ Spergel, 1993 p. 183

References

edit
edit