Wikipedia

Shocker (film)

Shocker (also known as Wes Craven's Shocker) is a 1989 American supernatural slasher film written and directed by Wes Craven, and starring Michael Murphy, Peter Berg, Cami Cooper, and Mitch Pileggi. The film was released by Universal Pictures on October 27, 1989, and grossed $16.6 million.[3]

Shocker
Theatrical release poster
Directed byWes Craven
Written byWes Craven
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyJacques Haitkin
Edited byAndy Blumenthal
Music byWilliam Goldstein
Production
company
Alive Films[1]
Distributed by
Release date
  • October 27, 1989 (1989-10-27)
Running time
110 minutes[2]
CountryUnited States[1]
LanguageEnglish
Box office$16.6 million[3]

Plot

edit

A news report shows a victim being pulled away on a stretcher. It is revealed that a serial killer, having murdered over thirty people, is on the loose in a Los Angeles suburb. Horace Pinker, a television repairman with a pronounced limp, is the culprit. When the investigating detective, Lt. Don Parker, gets too close, Pinker murders Parker's wife, foster daughter, and foster son.

However, his other foster son, a college football star named Jonathan, develops a strange connection to Pinker through his dreams and leads Parker to Pinker's run-down shop. In a shootout in which several officers are killed, Pinker escapes and targets Jonathan's girlfriend Alison in retribution, killing her as a "birthday present" while he is at practice.

Another dream leads Lt. Parker and the police to Pinker, whom they apprehend in the act of an attempted murder. Pinker is quickly convicted and sentenced to die in the electric chair.

Prior to his execution, Pinker reveals that Jonathan is, in fact, his son, and that as a boy, Jonathan had shot him in the knee while trying to stop the murder of his mother. But what they do not realize is that Pinker has made a deal with the devil. When executed, he does not die but instead becomes pure electricity. He is able to possess others to continue his murderous ways. Some of the people who are killed are prison staff and Jonathan's friends.

He soon possesses Lt. Parker, who uses his strength to fight off Pinker, and Pinker escapes into a TV dish. Jonathan and his friends try to find a way to fight him. Jonathan's friends, including Rhino, head to the power station to disable the power.

Jonathan, with the aid of Alison's "spirit", devises a scheme to bring Pinker back into the real world and accidentally discovers that Pinker, as with all energy sources, is bound by the laws of the real world; Jonathan uses this limitation to defeat Pinker, and traps him inside a television. Pinker threatens Jonathan that he will find a way out of his "prison". Alison's voice tells Jonathan to take care of himself, while Jonathan's neighborhood suffers a blackout, caused by his friends blowing out the power main, trapping Pinker in the television. Jonathan goes outside amid all his neighbors and looks up at the sky, agreeing with Alison that the stars are beautiful.

Cast

edit

Release

edit

Rating

edit

According to Craven, the film was severely cut for an "R" rating. It took around thirteen submissions to the Motion Picture Association of America to receive an "R" instead of an "X". Some scenes that were cut included Pinker spitting out fingers that he bit off of a prison guard, a longer and more graphic electrocution of Pinker, and a longer scene of a possessed coach stabbing his own hand. Despite fan interest, an uncut version has never been released.

Box office

edit

Shocker was released on October 27, 1989, in 1,783 venues. It earned $4,510,990 in its opening weekend, ranking second behind the third weekend of Look Who's Talking.[4] The film ultimately grossed $16.6 million in the United States.[3]

Critical response

edit

The film received a split vote from Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert on their weekly television show, with Siskel giving it "a marginal thumbs up" but Ebert voting "thumbs down" and explaining "I felt it would have been a better movie if it had played with more rules."[5] Stephen Holden of The New York Times wrote, "If the movie's metaphors are as obvious and as portentous as the heavy metal music that punctuates the action, 'Shocker' at least has the feel of a movie that was fun to make. Just when you think that every trick has been thrown in but the kitchen sink, it goes in too, along with stove and the refrigerator."[6] Variety wrote, "At first glance (or at least for the first 40 minutes) 'Shocker' seems a potential winner, an almost unbearably suspenseful, stylish and blood-drenched ride courtesy of writer-director Craven's flair for action and sick humor. As it continues, however, the camp aspects simply give way to the ridiculous while failing to establish any rules to govern the mayhem. The result is plenty of unintentional laughs that undermine the few legitimate chuckles and most of the remaining action."[7] Michael Wilmington of the Los Angeles Times stated that the film "is crammed with dazzling bursts of macabre technique" but "is so diffusely organized it's almost three separate movies."[8] Johanna Steinmetz of the Chicago Tribune gave the film one-and-a-half stars out of four and wrote, "A gory thrill show for underdeveloped sensibilities, it is sloppily organized and jarringly paced. Its single conceit, that a barrage of television programs has weakened both our values and our grasp of realities, while an excuse for a climax of ingenious special effects, can't sustain an entire movie."[9] Richard Harrington of The Washington Post said, "For the longest time, 'Shocker' is low voltage, just another gathering of slasher cliches. Toward the end, though, it comes to life thanks to an extended special effects package that is only hinted at earlier."[10] Kim Newman wrote in The Monthly Film Bulletin that "all the characters, especially the dumb-hunk hero and his dead but chatty girlfriend, are cardboard, and none of the connective tissue makes any sense. Asked to turn out 'another Nightmare on Elm Street', Craven has sadly resorted to facile self-imitation rather than coming up with something as fiercely original as his biggest hit movie."[11]

In Wes Craven: The Art of Horror, John Kenneth Muir described Shocker as "Craven's response to the Freddy Krueger film series" for Universal. Muir describes several similarities between the series, though he says Shocker is more comedic. Of the film's conclusion, Muir wrote, Shocker's final 20 minutes are a stylistic special effects tour de force and well worth the price of admission."[12] As of October 2023, the film holds a 30% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 27 reviews. The site's consensus reads: "With an intriguing enough premise and horror legend Wes Craven on writer-director duty, the real Shocker here is just how lame the end results turned out to be".[13]

Later Wes Craven said: “I’d like to redo Shocker just to get the special effects right because we had a real special effects disaster on the film. The guy who was doing all the visual effects kind of flamed out, had a nervous breakdown because he was attempting more than he could actually do. When he told us towards the end of the movie that not a single one of the special effects was actually working, he was working on a new technique, my son’s job specifically became just to find all the negative. It was all around town in unmarked boxes and under people’s editing [benches]. It was a nightmare itself. We pulled every favor in town to get all those special effects done very quickly, and some of them are pretty sketchy.”[14]

Metacritic scored Shocker 51 out of 100, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[citation needed]

Home media

edit

The film was released on DVD by Universal Studios in 1999.[15] It was subsequently re-released by the studio in 2007 as a double feature, alongside Craven's The People Under the Stairs.[16] The film's first Blu-ray edition was released by Shout! Factory on September 8, 2015.[17]

Legacy

edit

Literature

edit

Shocker received a novelization written by Randall Boyll that was published by Berkley Books on September 1, 1990.

Inspired Works

edit

Horace P. Gauge is a main antagonist in the video game The Suffering released in 2004. His name and fate are a direct reference to the Film.

Soundtrack

edit
Wes Craven's Shocker - No More Mr. Nice Guy - The Music
Soundtrack album by
Various Artists
ReleasedOctober 4, 1989
GenreHeavy metal, hard rock
Length37:44
LabelSBK Records

Original musical contributions included songs by Alice Cooper (who would later play Freddy Krueger's abusive foster father, Mr. Underwood, in Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare) and Megadeth, who covered Alice Cooper's 1973 hit "No More Mr. Nice Guy", among others. The movie's title song was written by Jean Beauvoir and Desmond Child and recorded by The Dudes of Wrath, a supergroup composed of Paul Stanley of Kiss and Desmond Child, both on vocals, Vivian Campbell and Guy Mann-Dude on guitars, Whitesnake's Rudy Sarzo on bass guitar, and Mötley Crüe's Tommy Lee on drums. The band also included backing vocals by Van Halen bassist Michael Anthony and Kane Roberts. The soundtrack was released on Capitol/SBK Records in 1989.[18]

Soundtrack listing
No.TitleArtistLength
1."Shocker"The Dudes of Wrath3:58
2."Love Transfusion"Iggy Pop4:22
3."No More Mr. Nice Guy" (Alice Cooper cover)Megadeth3:02
4."Sword & Stone"Bonfire3:57
5."Timeless Love"Saraya4:08
6."Shockdance"The Dudes of Wrath4:31
7."Demon Bell (The Ballad Of Horace Pinker)"Dangerous Toys3:56
8."The Awakening"Voodoo X6:02
9."Different Breed"Dead On3:48
10."Shocker (Reprise)"The Dudes Of Wrath2:54

References

edit
  1. ^ a b "Shocker". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Retrieved February 5, 2019.
  2. ^ "Shocker (18)". British Board of Film Classification. December 1, 1989. Retrieved September 1, 2016.
  3. ^ a b c "Shocker (1989)". Box Office Mojo. Internet Movie Database. Retrieved September 1, 2016.
  4. ^ "Weekend Box Office Results for October 27-29, 1989". Box Office Mojo. Internet Movie Database. October 30, 1989. Retrieved September 1, 2016.
  5. ^ Siskel & Ebert. Buena Vista Television. November 4, 1989.
  6. ^ Holden, Stephen (October 28, 1989). "A Mix of Gore and Freud". The New York Times. 16.
  7. ^ "Film Reviews: Shocker". Variety. November 1, 1989. 34.
  8. ^ Wilmington, Michael (October 27, 1989). "A TV Freak You Can't Escape in 'Shocker'". Los Angeles Times. F6.
  9. ^ Steinmetz, Johanna (October 31, 1989). "'Shocker' slogs through babble on the way to a smart finale". Chicago Tribune. Section 5, p. 5.
  10. ^ Harrington, Richard (November 2, 1989). "Electrified Revenge". The Washington Post. B15.
  11. ^ Newman, Kim (May 1990). "Shocker". The Monthly Film Bulletin. 57 (676): 142.
  12. ^ Muir, John Kenneth (2004). Wes Craven: The Art of Horror. McFarland. ISBN 9780786419234.
  13. ^ "Shocker (1989)". Rotten Tomatoes. Flixster. Retrieved July 28, 2019.
  14. ^ "Peter Berg Would do a Shocker Remake". May 28, 2014.
  15. ^ "Shocker (DVD)". dvdempire.com. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
  16. ^ "People Under The Stairs, The / Shocker (Double Feature)". dvdempire.com. Retrieved April 13, 2011.
  17. ^ "Shocker (blu-ray)".
  18. ^ "Shocker [Original Soundtrack]". AllMusic.
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shocker_(film)&oldid=1254617394"