The Sicambri (also Sugambri) were a Germanic people who lived in the area between the Rhine, Lippe, and Wupper rivers, in what is now Germany, near the border with the Netherlands. They were first reported by Julius Caesar, who encountered them in 55 BC. They became a significant opponent of Roman imperial power in the Rhine region. After a major defeat by the Romans in 8 BC a significant part of the Sicambri were moved into Roman territory.

The approximate positions of some Germanic peoples reported by Graeco-Roman authors in the 1st century.
Roman Gaul and Germania east of the Rhine around AD 70. The Sicambri by this point may have been living in the area labelled Cugerni.

Caesar categorized them as a Germanic people (Germani), although he did not necessarily define ethnicity in terms of language. Whether or not the Sicambri spoke a Germanic or Celtic language, or something else, is not certain. They lived in a contact zone where these two language families came into contact and were both influential.

By the 3rd century, the region in which they and their neighbours had lived had become part of the territory of the Franks, which was a new name that possibly represented a new alliance of older tribes, possibly including the Sicambri. However, many Sicambri had been moved into the Roman empire by this time.

Name and language

edit

The specific way the name is spelt differs can differ considerably across sources. The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography gives four variant spellings under the entry Sicambri: Sycambri, Sygambri, Sugambri, and Sucambri.[1] The earliest source, Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico, calls them Sugambri but in later sources they are more commonly called Sicambri.[2]

A Germanic etymology has been proposed for the name of the Sicambri or Sugambri. The first element su- is proposed to be a little-known Germanic version of Indo-European meaning "good", which is better attested in Celtic languages. The second part of the name is associated with the little-known Gambrivii, who are mentioned twice by Roman sources, and sometimes associated with the Sicambri by modern scholars, because of the similar names.[3]

The material culture of the early Sicambri which was a variant of the La Tène culture, which is associated with Celtic languages.[4] Like the Cimbri, and like their neighbours across the Rhine, the Eburones, many names of Sicambrian leaders end in typical Celtic suffixes like -rix (Baetorix, Deudorix, etc.). If the Sicambri were not Celtic speakers themselves, this could also indicate intense contacts with Celtic peoples across the Rhine in Gaul.

History

edit

Gallic Wars of Caesar

edit
 
The rivers Rhine, Lippe, and Wupper are here shown in green, red, and blue, respectively. The Sicambri, in the time of Caesar, were concentrated in the area between the three rivers.

The first mention of the Sicambri is in the fourth book, corresponding to year 55 BC, of Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico.[5] He reported, under the name Sugambri, a general location between the rivers Sieg and Lippe with a concentration between the rivers Rhine, Lippe, and Wupper.[6]

The tribe had an ancillary role in the Gallic Wars. In a series of clashes between the Romans and two transrhenic tribes – the Tencteri and Usipetes – that had crossed into the Eburones' territory on the western side of the Rhine, the tribes were defeated and their cavalry was forced back across the Rhine. Those cavalry forces then sought and received refuge with the Sicambri. Refusing Caesar's demand that the refugees be handed over the remark that the Rhine marked a natural Roman border, Caesar built a pile bridge across the Rhine and advanced into Sicambri territory. The Sicambri, however, did not wait for his arrival, but, on the advice of their wards, withdrew into forests and uninhabited areas where Caesar was unable to follow them. However, their villages, farms, and grain fields were systematically destroyed. Caesar withdrew after 18 days across the Rhine and destroyed the bridge on his return.[7]

In 53 BC, after Caesar defeated the Eburones, but failed to capture their leader Ambiorix, he reported that he invited all of the peoples that were interested to destroy the remainder. Some 2,000 Sicambrian horsemen responded to Caesar's call and, crossing the Rhine in boats, advanced into the Eburones' territory. However, amid their attack, they diverted from the Eburones to the Roman garrison at Aduatuca after hearing news that the Romans had stored a large amount of plunder there. The Romans, amid foraging and thus caught off-guard by the attack, repelled it only with substantial difficulty. The Sicambrians, taking their plunder with them, then retired back across the Rhine so to escape any reprisal.[8]

Germanic wars of Augustus

edit

Under the ensuing hegemony of the Romans in this region, the Rhine became a frontier, and the successors of Caesar helped fortify and reinforce their allies the Ubii, to the south of the Sicambri near modern Cologne. A faction of Chatti were also able to settle in Roman-controlled Batavia, in the Rhine delta just east of the Sugambri, becoming the Batavians.[9] The Sicambri were thus enclosed within a pincer movement by Rome's frontier policy.[4]

In 16 BC, during the reign of Augustus (r. 27 BC – AD 14), the Sicambrian leader Melo, brother of Baetorix, organised a raid including Tencteri and Usipetes, which defeated a Roman army under the command of Marcus Lollius. The Sugambri had damaged the prestige of the emperor, and they were quickly willing to negotiate agreements to prevent Roman reprisals. It nevertheless sparked a reaction from the Roman Empire and helped start the series of Germanic Wars. Among actions undertaken at this time the Romans established a fort at present day Xanten.[10]

From 12 BC-8 BC, the Roman empire put pressure upon the Sicambri and other opponents in this region in multiple campaigns, facing the Sicambri core lands.[10] In 12 BC the Sicambri made attacks across the Rhine. Nero Claudius Drusus (Drusus the Elder) launched an attack from Batavia, moving first through the lands of the Usipetes, and then devasted the Sicambrian country. In 11 BC he then devastated the Usipetes' country, and built a bridge over the Lippe in order to once again enter the Sicambrian lands. There he faced little resistance because they were in a conflict with their neighbours the Chatti. He was able to cross this country and reach the Cherusci frontier near the Weser. Drusus faced stiff resistance upon his return, but he defeated the Sicambri and it was probably at this time that the Romans built their fort at Oberaden, well east of the Rhine in Sicambrian territory. These descriptions show that the tribe was living to the south of the river Lippe, with the Usipetes now settled to their northwest.[11]

In 9 BC the Sicambri battled Drusus as part of a major alliance with the Cherusci and Suevi and lost. In 8-7 BC, after this defeat and the death of Drusus, the future emperor Tiberius forced the Sicambri, or a part of them, to move to the western, Roman-controlled, side of the Rhine. Modern historians speculate that they possibly merged into Romanized population immediately facing their old lands, who were known from about this time as the Cugerni.[12] The more detailed description of this period by Cassius Dio however describes the results of the victories of Tiberius somewhat differently:[13]

Accordingly all the barbarians except the Sugambri, through fear of them, made overtures of peace; but they gained nothing either at this time, — for Augustus refused to conclude a truce with them without the Sugambri, — or, indeed, later. To be sure, the Sugambri also sent envoys, 3 but so far were they from accomplishing anything that all of these envoys, who were both many and distinguished, perished into the bargain. For Augustus arrested them and placed them in various cities; and they, being greatly distressed at this, took their own lives. The Sugambri were thereupon quiet for a time, but later they amply requited the Romans for their calamity.[14]

It appears that Tiberius used a diplomatic approach where by the Sicambrian nobles were isolated as the Germanic region became more peace-seeking. More cooperative Germanic leaders took the upper hand. They accepted a Roman demand to move about 40,000 individuals people to the Xanten area west of the Rhine and elites were settled under the watchful eye of the Roman military.[10]

In 9 AD, Deudorix, son of Baetorix, joined the Germanic rebellion of Arminius, of the Cherusci, which annihilated the 3 Roman legions of Publius Quinctilius Varus. After the defeat of this alliance, Deudorix was among the captives paraded in Rome during the triumph of Germanicus.[15]

Strabo, writing around 20 AD, described the position of Sicambri using similar words to Caesar, and possibly based upon them. He placed them next to the Menapii, "who dwell on both sides of the river Rhine near its mouth, in marshes and low thorny woods. It is opposite to these Menapii that the Sicambri are situated". Strabo describes them as Germanic, and notes that beyond them are the Suevi and other peoples.[16] Elsewhere however, Strabo mentions that the Rhine valley Germans have mainly been displaced: "there are but few remaining, and some portion of them are Sicambri". He apparently understood their position on the Rhine to literally be on the coast. With the German wars still on-going, he describes them as being one of the most well-known Germanic tribes in his time.[17]

In contrast to those Sicambri who were moved west of the Rhine, the main part of the Sicambri "migrated deep into the country anticipating the Romans" according to Strabo. It has been suggested that the Marsi were a part of the Sicambri who managed to stay east of the Rhine after most had been moved from the area to join the Eburones and other cisrhenic Germans.[18] By the time of Rome's conflict with the British Silures, Tacitus reports that the Sicambri could be mentioned as an historical example of a tribe who "had been formerly destroyed or transplanted into Gaul".[19]

Claudius Ptolemy, in the second century AD, still located the Sicambri, together with the Bructeri Minores, at the most northern part of the Rhine and south of the Frisii who inhabit the coast north of the river. However it is likely that this part of his geography was based upon earlier Roman authors.[20]

Legacy

edit

Although the Sicambri ceased to exist as an independent political entity in 8 BC, their legacy was preserved through the traditional names of three Roman auxiliary cohorts, and a Roman literary tradition which portrayed them as archetypical warlike savages, with a resistance to higher culture.[21]

In 26 AD, some Sicambrian auxiliaries allied to Rome were involved in crushing an uprising of Thracian tribesmen.[22] All inscriptions found mentioning the Sicambri are from the period 76-157 AD, with the exception of one uncertain example from Mauretania in North Africa, which is dated to 255 AD. After this the only clear surviving records of the Sicambri are as a literary trope.[23] There are around 20 inscriptions mentioning the cohortes Sugambrorum found mainly in the north of the Balkans, where they apparently helped defend the Lower Danube frontier regions in present day Romania, Bulgaria, and North Macedonia. Others are found in Turkey, and the city of Rome itself.[24]

As a literary stereotype the Sicambri were used by some of the best-known poets of the Augustan era, setting an example for later literature. For example, in the later part of the first century AD, Martial, in his Liber De Spectaculis, a series of epigrams written to celebrate the games in the Colosseum under Titus or Domitian, noted the attendance of numerous peoples, including the Sicambri: "With locks twisted into a knot, are come the Sicambrians..."[25] Another poet who used this trope was Horace, in his Odes.[26]

Centuries later, authors of Late Antiquity used the Sicambri name as a literate alias for the Franks who came from the same region, but had a name with less history. This was part of a bigger tendency in literature. For example, the Goths, who similarly appeared in the third century, were routinely called Getae or Scythians. Authors who referred to the Franks as Sicambri included Claudian, Sidonius Apollinaris,[27] Venantius Fortunatus,[28] the Panegyrici Latini, the Life of King Sigismund, and the Life of King Dagobert.[citation needed]

This literary tradition had an influence lasting into the early middle ages. Gregory of Tours metaphorically referred to Clovis I as a rough Sugambrian who needed to abandon his impetuous nature and open himself to the beneficial influence of Christianity, referring to his baptism, around the year 500.[29]

Some mediaeval authors writing in the seventh and eighth centuries placed the Sicambri in origin myths for the Franks. The Chronicle of Fredegar asserts that the Franks were first led by a king named Priam; after the fall of Troy, some Franks follow his successor Friga to the Danube. Some time later another split occurs, with some of these Franks following a Francio to the Rhine valley where they settle permanently.[30] Another tradition, recorded in the Liber Historiae Francorum, written in AD 727, asserts that after Troy's fall, two leaders called Priam and Antenor lead some 12,000 men to the river Tanais (now called the Don) and thence to Pannonia. Settling in Pannonia, they construct a city called Sicambria. An emperor called Valentinian, offering remission of taxes, incites the Franks to fight the Alans in the Maeotic Swamps on the Sea of Azov. But after the tax remission elapses the Franks then kill Valentinian's tax collectors, leading to a battle in which king Priam dies. The Franks then leave Pannonia behind for the Rhine valley.[31] These stories of Trojan origin are rejected as fantastical myth,[32] though some scholars such as Ian Wood have suggested that the specifically Trojan element may have emerged from a diplomatic title granted by the real emperor Valentinian for Frankish victories against the Alamans.[33]

Another tradition, preserved by Gregory of Tours, asserts that there was a migration of Franks from Pannonia to the Rhine valley via Thuringia.[34] However, all such legends of migration are rejected by modern scholars since there is no archaeological or historical evidence that the Franks originated anywhere other than the Rhine valley.[35]

Notes

edit
  1. ^   Smith, William, ed. (1854–1857). "Sicambri". Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. London: John Murray.
  2. ^ Van Loon 2016, p. 60 citing Caesar, Bellum Gallicum, 4.16.
  3. ^ Neumann 1998.
  4. ^ a b Heinrichs 2005, p. 125.
  5. ^ See Caesar, Bellum Gallicum, 4.16.
  6. ^ Heinrichs 2005, p. 124, citing Caesar, Bellum Gallicum, 6.35.5.
  7. ^ Schönfeld 1931, col. 659. For Caesar's narrative, see Caesar, Bellum Gallicum:
    • 4.12–15, on the defeat of the Tencteri and Usipetes;
    • 4.16, on Sicambri refusal of Caesar's demands;
    • 4.17–18, on construction of the bridge;
    • 4.18–19, on Sicambri withdrawal, Caesar's destruction of their villages, and withdrawal.
  8. ^ Schönfeld 1931, col. 659, citing among others Caesar, Bellum Gallicum, 6.35–42 and Dio, 40.32.3–5. The Roman commander on the ground was Quintus Tullius Cicero. Caesar, Bellum Gallicum, 6.36.
  9. ^ Derks 2009.
  10. ^ a b c Heinrichs 2005, p. 126.
  11. ^ Lanting & van der Plicht (2010, p. 64) citing Dio, 54.32, and dendrochronological data from Oberaden.
  12. ^ For example, Lanting & van der Plicht (2010, p. 64); Van Loon (2016, pp. 61–62), citing Ewig and Heinrichs (2005). Classical sources mentioning the forced move include Florus, 2.30 (also here); Orosius and Suetonius (Augustus, 21 and Tiberius, 9).
  13. ^ Lanting & van der Plicht (2010, p. 64), citing Dio, 55.
  14. ^ Dio, 55.
  15. ^ Lanting & van der Plicht (2010, p. 64) citing Strabo, 7.1.4.
  16. ^ Strabo, 4.3.
  17. ^ Strabo, 7.1–2.
  18. ^ Lanting & van der Plicht 2010, p. 64.
  19. ^ Tacitus, Annales, 12.39.
  20. ^ Ptolemy 2.10
  21. ^ Heinrichs 2005, pp. 126–127.
  22. ^ Tacitus, Annales, 4.47.
  23. ^ Van Loon 2016, p. 63.
  24. ^ Van Loon 2016, p. 61.
  25. ^ Martial, Liber de spectaculis, epigram 3, line 9.
  26. ^ Heinrichs (2005, p. 127) citing Odes 4,14,51 and 4,2,34 ff, cf. 21, 662.
  27. ^ Goffart, Walter (1981). "Rome, Constantinople, and the Barbarians". American Historical Review. 86 (2): 275–306. doi:10.2307/1857439. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 1857439. Also Van Loon 2016, p. 67.
  28. ^ Buchberger, Erica (2016). "Romans, barbarians, and Franks in the writings of Venantius Fortunatus". Early Medieval Europe. 24 (3): 293–307. doi:10.1111/emed.12153. ISSN 0963-9462. See pp. 302–3.
  29. ^ Heinrichs (2005, p. 127), citing Gregory of Tours. History of the Franks. 2.31. Merovingian Frankish leader Clovis I addressed as a "Sicamber" by Saint Remigius, the officiating bishop of Rheims.
  30. ^ Wood 1993, pp. 33–34, citing Fredegar, 3.2.
  31. ^ Wood 1993, p. 34, citing Liber Historiae Francorum, 1–4.
  32. ^ Wood 1993, p. 34. "These tales are obviously no more than legend".
  33. ^ Wood 1993, pp. 34–35. "What had been no more than a name [Trojan] implying a certain diplomatic affiliation between the Franks and Valentinian must have been [re-]interpreted as providing a genuine indication of the origins of the Franks".
  34. ^ Wood 1993, p. 35, citing Gregory, History of the Franks, 1.36, 2.9.
  35. ^ Wood 1993, p. 35.

Bibliography

edit

Modern sources

edit

Ancient sources

edit
  • Caesar. Bellum Gallicum.
  • Dio. Roman History.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link)
  • Fredegar (1960). The fourth book of the Chronicle of Fredegar; with its continuations. Translated by Wallace-Hadrill, J M. OCLC 401901.
  • Martial. Liber de Spectaculis. Chapter 3.
  • Ptolemy. Geography.
  • Strabo. Geography.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (link)
  • Suetonius. Augustus. Lives of the Caesars.
  • Tacitus. Annales . Translated by Church, Alfred John; Brodribb, William Jackson – via Wikisource. (Translated 1876.)

See also

edit
edit