Talk:$1,000 genome

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Claim that Veritas Genomics has achieved $1,000 genome

edit

This claim needs to be substantiated. I am happy with the statement that Veritas Genomics *claim* to have achieved the $1,000 genome, or announced this. However, many companies have claimed to have reached the $1,000 genome (Whole_genome_sequencing#Commercialization). To prove the claim, it needs to be clear what exact criteria constitute achieving the $1,000 genome (whether it be the cancelled X Prize's definition or otherwise), and then shown via objective independent verification that Veritas Genomics have met those criteria. Jmc200 (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Type of sequencing

edit

Can someone clarify is this is full genome sequencing or exome sequencing? Natureium (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on $1,000 genome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply