Talk:She Shoulda Said No!

(Redirected from Talk:"She Shoulda Said 'No'!")
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleShe Shoulda Said No! is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 25, 2017.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 16, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 1, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
September 28, 2013Featured article reviewKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that "She Shoulda Said 'No'!" was partially inspired by the arrest of actress Lila Leeds, who later starred in the film?
Current status: Featured article

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Additional reference

edit

I found this reference, which discuss' the American Movie Classics film Ballyhoo: The Hollywood Sideshow, which has a piece on "She Shoulda Said 'No'!". Please feel free to work it into the article if it has some relevance. -- Jreferee 02:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Another ref:

Posters

edit

As mentioned above, I did have an image of the film released as The Devil's Weed, and I've uploaded that. Also I found a copy of the film under its She Shoulda Said 'No'! title, with the caption after it-- "But she didn't'"-- which apparently caused confusion with the Cocaine Fiends book. As I said above, I hesitate to make big formatting changes to an FA article. If the posters are too much, feel free to remove them. God knows I'm used to having images deleted... and getting bot-notifications sprayed all over my talk page... :-( Dekkappai (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

(Sigh) me too... I'm thinking of starting an image gallery at Unimpedia for all the images that Wikipedia rejects. Andrewa (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Actually, these images are all public domain, so they don't need anything special. None of this stuff had the copyrights renewed. Badlydrawnjeff (talk) 15:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hmmmm, is that under the old US law that required registration of copyright? Andrewa (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Specifically, I'm using the definitions here, where it was published between 1923-1963 and the copyright does not appear to be renewed. I have checked the relevant books for most of Babb's films and the only one with a renewal is Mom and Dad. --Badlydrawnjeff (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on She Shoulda Said No!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply