Talk:Édouard Ducpétiaux
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Favonian in topic Requested move
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Edouard Ducpétiaux → Édouard Ducpétiaux – per WP:FRMOS and sources including Historical Dictionary of Brussels. --Relisted Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC) In ictu oculi (talk) 06:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment this is messed up, one of the sources says "DUCPÉTIAUX, ANTOINE-ÉDOUARD", another says "Édouard Antoine Ducpétiaux". -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 06:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, :) heaven knows what Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon 1908 from a Russian website is doing as a source anyway. Confirmed English source with French source Bruxelles 2000 Page 76. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Purely a styling matter (a famous one!); and resolved on Wikipedia by provisions at WP:FRMOS, as the proposer notes. NoeticaTea? 01:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support; if that's the spelling used by the best sources, it's quite straightforward. bobrayner (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- the correct diacritricals should normally be used. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.