Talk:Étienne Hastrel de Rivedoux/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   French placenames should be rendered in French, not translated. (Île de Ré, not Isle of Rhé) Watch your accents; I already added one to Grand Armée. Why is France italicized? Command, not manage.

   should be good now.

   Still need to fix Île de Ré, otherwise looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

   Ah, fixed. There was a redirect on the English spelling, so I didn't notice. auntieruth (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Does anyone provide an explanation how he was able to serve both the Bourbons and Napoleon without penalty?

   Not really. It sounds as if he was a very capable manager. And a lot of them made the transition from Napoleon to the Bourbons fairly seamlessly. Ney is one of the exceptions.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No picture available?

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: