Talk:Široka Kula massacre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 23:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

• No DABs and external links are good.
• Do you know why the one guy who voluntarily returned was acquitted?
  • The source implies the prosecution failed to prove its case. But it does not say how. Croatian legislation grants right of retrial for anyone convicted in absentia as long as they request so upon their arrest. I suspect the original defence attorney (presumably appointed by the court) was not as thorough as the one hired by the defendant - but this is just my guesswork, there's not a peep on what was different between the two trials. I added info that the acquittal was based on lack of evidence presented against the defendant (as noted in the source).--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
• Clarify that all of the Serbs tried in absentia never served any prison time.
  • Done.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
• Any idea why the Serb trial took so long?
  • The trial did not start until 2010 despite the investigation 19 years earlier on. Added info to clarify this.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
• Put English-language titles in title case.
  • Done.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
• Otherwise, nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the review. I believe I have addressed the issues you raised here.--Tomobe03 (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)