Talk:Švitrigaila

"<was the last champion of Ruthenian Orthodox>"

The writing that svitrigaila was a champion is true. And such sayings represent his role in Grand Duchy. And these words should be avoided in encyclopedia if not talking about true champ. He was a Grand Duke and this should be noted in headline.

Request renaming the headline M.K 12:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Be bold! Renata 19:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

--Ghirla -трёп- 05:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Renata 05:34, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I repeat: I wish you had written a couple of articles on Grand Dukes of Lithuania yourselves before attacking those written by Russian biased authors. It is as if Russian atrocities and censorship continue to exist after Stalin is long dead. Good bye, Ghirla ^-трёп- 05:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Very "constructive" talk from Ghirlandajo, very similar like this [1]. And I repeat encyclopedia (and the headline mostly) should be avoided such words as champ. and so on, headline is to people came and see simple and main info on person; lets say little girl came here and reads "was the last champion of Ruthenian Orthodox" and latter writes in her school work: Svitrigaila, as champion, ruled Grand Duchy, not long . And this is only one problem if we will talk about champs. If somebody wrote and article with mistakes and you stated your problem clearly on talk and you do not received any counterview.....

"I wish you had written a couple of articles on Grand Dukes of Lithuania yourselves before attacking those written by others." What do you mean? What such as '"superior" as your self can’t make a mistakes and false ideas? You can’t recognizes basics of linguistics side (talking bout other his edits), If you wrote this article you should at least had to familiarize with his seals and edicts and this way such camps. never accrue.

Now about more common problem. The Orthodox in headline could be (Some Lithuanian noblemen did not support him as Grand Duke , some part supported; after vacuum left by Vytautas Poland tried to interfere in Lithuania maters and they supported other candidate, Svitrigaila seeing that he have no major support from Lith. went to Ruth., but they demanded and made conditions for help.) , mine goal was a champ. And that was written about him was a mockery. And I do not let that someone make mockery from Grand Dukes of Lithuania. M.K 07:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

By the way Switrigajlo ideed was popular between Ruthenians (but not Russians as currently is written) 82.135.217.131 (talk) 10:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Švitrigaila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080303191252/http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/ to http://mkp.emokykla.lt/gimtoji/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)