Talk:Β-Amylase
Latest comment: 5 years ago by BD2412 in topic Requested move 11 November 2018
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 November 2018
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved to Beta-amylase as least-worst option, and is most consistent with the closest related consensus-based title, Alpha-amylase. bd2412 T 19:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
B-amylase → β-amylase – The enzyme's name is beta-amylase[1] not b-amylase. This can be written more pleasantly β-amylase which is my suggested title; β-amylase is currently a redirect to amylase but should not be. To the best of my knowledge and the source given, b-amylase is just wrong, although is probably a good redirect. User:GKFXtalk 20:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 13:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- @GKFX, Sam Sailor, and 70.51.45.46: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:19, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- A page mover can't do it, β-amylase is on the title blacklist. Sam Sailor 22:02, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- It would be clearer with Beta amylase or beta-amylase -- 70.51.45.46 (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)]
- Support either Beta amylase or Beta-amylase or β-amylase. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Per WP:NCCHEM#Prefixes in titles, the recommended name is beta-Amylase – cf. beta-Carotene, beta-Endorphin, beta-Carboline. The current title is plain wrong, however. No such user (talk) 19:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- And, on the other hand, its sister article is at Alpha-amylase, where it was moved in 2012 per Talk:Alpha-amylase#Move?, citing WP:CONSISTENCY with other articles in Category:Enzymes. We seem to have contradicting guidance and practice. No such user (talk) 08:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.