Talk:-ana

Latest comment: 1 month ago by VenomousConcept in topic Origin

Origin

edit

First, we're told "The history of this usage as a self-conscious literary construction, typically as a book title, traces back to 1740 ..."

Then, we're given an example that dates from 1718. Doesn't this mean that -ana/-iana dates from at least as early as 1718? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 07:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

What the page cited as reference shows in 1740 is Scaligerana, Thuana, Perroniana, which is the self-conscious manufacture of titles using the suffix. There could be more to it all, I don't know the bibliographic material in any detail. Thanks for the expansion, by the way. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Charles. I missed your post back in Feb. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 23:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cool Gissella espino (talk) 02:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

The original usage is Virgiliana relating to the works of Virgil. See Libfix. This should be included on the page. VenomousConcept (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Gissella espino (talk) 02:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Japanese

edit

Could Hiragana and Katakana be described here or does that have a differing etymology? Ranze (talk) 22:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on -ana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Äa

edit

%tr









A

G














TR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.206.201.212 (talk) 00:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vedatkaradag 31.206.201.212 (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
16 31.206.201.212 (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply