Talk:.44 Special

Untitled

Anyone know why there's a link to the 10mm page in the See Also section? --Rtkwe --166.82.9.44 (talk) 04:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Because the 44 Special is mentioned in that article as being in the 10mm caliber range? 86.166.66.41 (talk) 14:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:WIc3e01BG9gJ:www.gunsandammomag.com/ammunition/fabulous_44_mag/+%2244+magnum%22+%22.44+special%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us
  • In .44 Special on 2011-05-20 21:37:46, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
  • In .44 Special on 2011-05-31 13:00:17, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on .44 Special. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927040132/http://www.federalcartridge.com/ballistics/ to http://www.federalcartridge.com/ballistics/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Footnote #3

The article says that the .44 Special cartridge was introduced with smokeless powder ammo that duplicated the performance of the old .44 S&W Russian, but that greater performance was possible.

I can't find a source, but I have read that some of the earliest types of smokeless powder were very low density, and filled the entire .44 Special case to get the same performance as the shorter Russian got with 23.0gr of FFFg blackpowder. The third paragraph under "Development History" says as much.

If they'd waited six more years, Hercules "Bullseye" smokeless powder, which became commercially available in 1913, would have been appropriate. The factories adopted it as soon as it appeared, and 4.5gr Bullseye was used in the factory 246gr ammo as the standard .44 Special load for generations.

...also, that claimed 755 ft/sec is from 6 1/2" S&W N-frame revolvers. From the more common 4" barrels, 650-ish feet per second, more or less, is the expected velocity with that ammo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:400:8000:A140:D102:EE99:2F52:5C47 (talk) 09:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

44 mag 44 special

can an older 44 mag marlin shoot 44 special effectively with out any problems — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6A30:9040:3105:436F:9BA5:C58E (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)