Talk:.design/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about .design. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
COI
In accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, I have chosen to disclose that I have a personal connection to this subject. But, my main purpose in writing this article is to benefit Wikipedia and its mission. I believe this article is written from a neutral perspective, is sourced appropriately, and has been constructed from independent, reliable sources. The second link above provides the following summary, which I believe I have followed appropriately:
- Be transparent about your conflict of interest (
Done) - Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources. ( Done)
- Your role is to inform and reference, not promote or sell. ( Done)
- Be extremely cautious about the risks of editing articles about yourself or your clients ( Done)
- If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject. ( Done)
- State facts and statistics, don't be vague or general. ( Done)
- Take time to get sources and policy right. ( Done)
- Get neutral, uninvolved, disinterested editors to review your draft. (
Doing...) - Work with the community and we'll work with you. ( Doing...)
- Communicate, communicate, communicate. ( Doing...)
My ultimate goal is to promote this article to Good or Featured status. I understand this will require review and assistance from other members of the community, which is great. I invite all to examine this article carefully to make sure the content is fair and accurate. I have experience promoting COI articles to Good or Featured status, including this one, this one, this one and this one. Feel free to contact me if you have any concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)