Talk:100th (Yeomanry) Regiment Royal Artillery
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Battery
editAs it stands, this article has the word 'battery' or 'batteries' in it more often than it has lines of text! Its not very good writing.
I am tempted to replace a few 'battery's with 'unit', (or 'sub-unit'), but I also think it might be a good thing to get some sort of consensus first.
What do other editors think?
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 100th (Yeomanry) Regiment Royal Artillery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040315024235/http://www.win.tue.nl/~drenth/BritArmy/Lineage/RA/ to http://www.win.tue.nl/~drenth/BritArmy/Lineage/RA/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130810031303/http://www.serfca.org/Portals/0/Images/f/SUMMARY%20OF%20A2020%20RESERVE%20STRUCTURE%20AND%20BASING%20CHANGES.pdf to http://www.serfca.org/Portals/0/Images/f/SUMMARY%20OF%20A2020%20RESERVE%20STRUCTURE%20AND%20BASING%20CHANGES.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131023001138/http://www.army.mod.uk/artillery/23445.aspx to http://www.army.mod.uk/artillery/23445.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC)