Talk:10 euro note/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Will review it in some days.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. | Article passed, thanks for the hard work. |
Comments
editI am leaving some dupicate detector comments:
- DONE.
- DONE.
- Cannot be changed.
- Cannot be changed.
- DONE.
- Cannot be changed.
- Cannot be changed.
- Viewing this, I am putting a palm to my face. (FACEPALM).
- Cannot be changed.
- "
I'll finish the improving later on.– Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
(Translated text from es:Billete de diez euros)
- Follow-up
There are several communities of people at European level (most of which is EuroBillTracker ) that, as a hobby, it keeps track of the euro banknotes that pass through their hands, to keep track and know where they travel or have traveled. The aim is to record as many notes as possible in order to know details about its spread (from where and to where they travel in general), follow it up (where a ticket has been seen in particular) and generate statistics and rankings (for example, in which countries there are more tickets). EuroBillTracker currently are registered more than 75 million tickets, worth more than 1600 million euros.
- No references.
Am I supposed to use this? – Plarem (User talk contribs) 18:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Now, I have never seen such a good GA Reviewer. Your English grammar isn't perfect, but your reviewing skills are great! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- If the the content is not reliable, do not add it, btw thanks for your comments, I know my English grammar isn't perfect, but I am trying to fix that. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Since references are there now, you can keep it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Maybe there is some misunderstanding, i meant to change the "Security Features:" section, not the "Paper Type:".Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)