Talk:130 (number)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2600:1700:53B1:1450:5589:9F9D:AC48:B60A in topic One thousand and 50
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reason for Removing from 130 "This number is the sum of primes"
editI consider 1 to be a prime number, and I forget that a lot of people don't. It appears to me that as a collective, Wikipedia does not consider 1 to be prime. As a consequence of this belief, 129 is a cumulative primesum, 130 is not a primesum of any kind. User:PrimeFan
Divisors consistency
editI'm noticing that the divisors entries in the tables for the integers is varying in consistency. As i spot them, I'll change them to include 1 and the number. so that they match [[table_of_divisors]. Cormullion 14:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
One thousand and 50
editDecimal 2600:1700:53B1:1450:5589:9F9D:AC48:B60A (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)