Talk:13th Light Tank Brigade

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Catlemur in topic GA Review
Good article13th Light Tank Brigade has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 26, 2020Good article nomineeListed
November 13, 2023WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:13th Light Tank Brigade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Catlemur (talk · contribs) 13:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


I will begin the review shortly.--Catlemur (talk) 13:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • "246 BT-7s and ten T-26s" - change to "10 T-26s" for the sake of consistency.
  • "This advance allowed Kolessa to successfully break out to the Kämärä station area late that day." - Do you mean later that day, too late to be useful or towards the end of that day?
  • "The 13th suffered casualties of were 234 killed, 484 wounded, and 23 missing." - Reword.
  • Include the invasion of Estonia in the infobox.
  • Shouldn't the category be Military units and formations established in 1932?


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass:  
    Well done.--Catlemur (talk) 17:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply