Talk:140 Broadway
Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 140 Broadway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | 140 Broadway has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 25, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from 140 Broadway appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 3 February 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus: TastyPoutine, I have no problem with you renominating this but I would strongly advise to provide evidence if you're going to be making an argument on the basis of WP:COMMONNAME. Show what reliable sources are calling it, see what Google Ngrams has to say, etc. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Marine Midland Building → 140 Broadway – Building name has changed. Now called 140 Broadway https://www.140broadway.com/The-building.html, Sources generally refer to this as the "former Marine Midland Building". The bank that it was named for hasn't even existed for 20 years, so the recognizability of the name may be fading. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 21:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Oppose, no evidence that the WP:COMMONNAME has changed and the proposed title is likely to be less recognizable. Dekimasuよ! 21:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)- Oppose. Buildings tend to be known by significant historic names long after the entity providing the name is gone. bd2412 T 13:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- So what is actually the evidence that this is the common name of the building. Since 2000, there is one mention of the building as The Marine Midland Building in The NY Times and that refers to an incident that occurred in the 1960’s when it was called that. Prior to 2000, it referred to the building as Marine Midland far more often. The NY Post refers to it as the Marine Midland building exactly zero times. But it does refer to the building as 140 Broadway as early as 2001. More contemporary sources for the most part, they use the name at all, say the “former Marine Midland Building” or aka the Marine Midland Building. The name seems to be singularly uncommon as far as reliable sources are concerned. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 12:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Striking oppose, but I will not support at this time since this is anecdotal evidence. It is not bad anecdotal evidence, but at least this much should have been included in the original proposal. The burden of presenting evidence is on editors hoping to make a change. Dekimasuよ! 17:38, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
140 Broadway
- ... that the construction of 140 Broadway (pictured) in New York City's Financial District was so quiet that a nearby office worker said his lawnmower made more noise? Source: NY Times 1966
- ALT1:... that Ada Louise Huxtable called 140 Broadway (pictured) "not only one of [the] buildings I admire most in New York, but that I admire most anywhere"? Source: New York 1960 : architecture and urbanism between the Second World War and the Bicentennial. p. 180
- ALT2:... that after 140 Broadway's air-conditioning system was dumped into a tank, its 10,000 workers went without air conditioning for weeks until scuba divers retrieved it? Source: NY Times 1984
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 23:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
interesting read, i think ALT0 is the hookiest and best to use, if ALT2 was used then it should be changed to "that after parts of 140 Broadway's air-conditioning system were dumped into a tank, 10,000 workers went without air conditioning for weeks until scuba divers retrieved them?" because otherwise it seems the whole system went in the tank Mujinga (talk) 19:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)