Talk:1452/1453 mystery eruption

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Kuwae was copied or moved into 1452/1453 mystery eruption on 1 March 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

1452/1453 or 1458

Latest comment: 16 days ago6 comments6 people in discussion

The articles 1452/1453 mystery eruption and 1458 mystery eruption seem to have an overlapping scope - this study claims that in Antarctica there is evidence for two separate eruptions, but it's not clear which of them the other sources/content refers to. Moreover, the attribution of either to Kuwae is question able. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. In view of the uncertainties, I think it is too early to decide on a possible merger. We should wait until the picture becomes clearer. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree that we should wait until the picture becomes clearer. Volcanoguy 01:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The current consensus in the ice core community is that there are two mystery eruptions: a northern hemispheric one in 1452 and a southern hemispheric one in 1458. The consensus in PAGES-VICS is that if Kuwae has anything to do with the mystery eruptions, then it is probably the southern hemispheric one in 1458. However, Kuwae continues to be associated with the 1452 eruption (an old hypothesis from 1994) in some papers because some authors from other fields have yet to catch up on developments in ice core chronologies over the last few years. Merging wouldn't hurt as long as the article is about 1450s double mystery eruptions Aleral Wei (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

So, perhaps a joint title of 1450s mystery eruptions might be best, allowing both topics to be discussed in one place to reduce overlap and help to discuss results that might refer to one or the other. Klbrain (talk) 15:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Question and Comment: Is it possible to get a list of sources which do and do not consider these two separate events? It would be helpful to know which sources consider this is ambiguous. I think if a merge is considered is there a title that would be both used in reliable sources and a title that would actually be used by people trying to find information on the events. John Cummings (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic