Talk:15th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 01:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Progression

• Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
• Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

• Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
• Disambiguations: a few dab links [3]:
  • Salient
  • Buna
  • Wau
  • Caloundra, Queensland (redirect page)
    • Caloundra (disambiguation)
• Linkrot: external links check reveals one dead link [4]:
  • The Forgotten First: The 1st Australian Division in the Great War and its Legacy (info) [army.gov.au]
• Alt text: Images all have alt text [5] (no action req'd).
• Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing [6] (no action req'd).
• Duplicate links: on duplicate link:
  • Citizens Forces

Criteria

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

  • I've done a copy edit.
  • A couple of technical MOS issues above.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

  • All major points cited using WP:RS.
  • "Chataway 1948, p. 130–132" should be presented with "pp" instead of "p" as its a page range.
  • No issues with OR.

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

  • Most major points seem to be covered without going into undue detail.
  • Level of coverage seems appropriate.

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

  • No issues here.

• It is stable.

  No edit wars etc.:

  • No issues here.

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:

  • Images are PD and seem appropriate to the article.

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

  • Just a couple of minor technical fixes req'd, otherwise good. Anotherclown (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for taking the time to review this. I think I've fixed all the issues identified above. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
      • Changes look fine. Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
        • Cheers, have a good one. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)