Talk:1612 in Ireland

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hiberno-English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

This deletion is a bit quick off the mark and fails to take any notice of context, particularly my trying to add birth and death entries to Years in Ireland. I am adding content to all the Years in Ireland articles as I find it and will be adding more to this, as I will to other such articles. It also allows others to add content in the collaborative way that is supposed to be Wiki - deletion this speedy allows no opportunity for this. Please have a modicum of patience - this speedy deletion approach is a very bad policy when applied in this way. NB this is not the same as 1612 itself. Ardfern (talk) 15:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

In that case, how about you userfy the page(s) for now (move them into your userspace). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I concur. I have already voiced my feelings on the matter. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{we need to talk.} 15:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I declined the speedy delete request because the reason given doesn't match any of the criteria in Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. If there's a good chance that this article can be expanded and given enough content to qualify at least as a stub, then there shouldn't be a rush to delete it. If there are still objections to the article, then the processes WP:PROD or WP:AFD apply. Asking for speedy deletion has a chilling effect on editors who are trying to create new articles. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic