Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue station

Requested move 24 February 2017

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
WP:SNOW close as a train wreck. There is clearly no consensus for what was proposed. There clearly is consensus that further discussion needs to happen about WP:USSTATION's wording and interpretation. That discussion should happen at that guideline's talk page (not a wikiproject page). I suggest an RfC, and a focus on ensuring that USSTATION is consistent with site-wide policies and guidelines, which should get rid of interpretational problems and other conflicts. Be aware that lower-casing any unnecessarily capitalized elements is expected by MOS:CAPS (see also mass RM of "Line" to "line" closing with "Move all per overwelming consensus."), and that WP:AT and WP:DAB do clearly expect removal of unnecessary disambiguations, and avoidance of parenthetical ones where natural wording will suffice. So, how to make USSTATION clearer is pretty obvious.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  23:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure)Reply

– Remove unnecessary disambiguators and add "station" per WP:USSTATION Pppery 17:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Responses

edit
With IRT 59th/CC a transfer station with a generic title, there should be no obvious conflicts between IRT Broadway and BMT Broadway. Just make sure 23rd Street station (Seventh Avenue Line), etc redirects to the right station. BMT Broadway / BMT Broadway Brooklyn is avoided because WP uses "BMT Jamaica". The other cases are all abandoned stations. In the small handful of those cases, the open station should stick to the standrdized scheme (Rockaway Avenue station (Fulton Street Line)) and the abandoned station either uses a parenthetical of (abandoned) or (BMT Fulton Street Line). — Train2104 (t • c) 23:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Why would the demolished station be labeled "abandoned" in the title? That implies that the two stations were on the same Fulton Street Line, when they aren't. epicgenius (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'd also like to point out there are abandoned stations on existing lines, most notably City Hall (IRT Lexington Avenue Line). Speaking of which there's also the distinction between stations along the IRT Lexington Avenue Line and former BMT Lexington Avenue Line (some of which are still being used on the BMT Jamaica Line), thus the naming conventions between the ones on the IND Fulton Street Line and BMT Fulton Street Line should remain in tact. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

EDIT: Do Create the alternate titles as redirects.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

These moves eventually happened after this June 2019 NYC Subway RfC. – wbm1058 (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply