Talk:1651 in music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Contradiction between lead sentence and first section

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can someone justify this juxtaposition:

First, the lead sentence:
The year 1651 in music involved some significant events.

Then, the first section

Events

none listed (bold emphasis added by moi)

What's up with this? Should this article be deleted if it's supposed to be about significant events that never happened? Un school 20:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic