Talk:1669–1670 papal conclave
Latest comment: 7 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic Title
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
| 1669–1670 papal conclave has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 10, 2017. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when his candidacy was vetoed in the 1669–70 papal conclave, Scipione Pannocchieschi d’Elci became so embarrassed that it was said to be the cause of his death shortly thereafter? | |||||||||
Cardinal-Bishop
editIt is clear from looking at the table that someone misunderstands the term "Cardinal-Bishop". This Conclave had only 6 Cardinals with the Cardinal Rank of Bishop.--Dcheney (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Title
editShouldn't the title of this article be Papal conclave, 1669–1670 per relatively recent changes to MOS:DATERANGE? The Rambling Man (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man, since they are consecutive years. MOS seems to allow for the current format. If you prefer the four digit format, I can round-robin the pages. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- No, that's cool, I hadn't seen that clause. Cheers for the pointer. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)