Talk:1707 Hōei earthquake
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1707 Hōei earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 1707 Hōei earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 28, 2012, October 28, 2015, October 28, 2018, October 28, 2020, October 28, 2023, and October 28, 2024. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Death toll
editThe number of causalties attributed to an earthquake is always a problem - we can't event agree on the number for the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Having said that there appears to be a general consensus in published catalogues and scientific papers that the casualties for this event were about 5,000. A stronger source than a news report would be needed to overturn that I think. Mikenorton (talk) 12:03, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
IISEE link
editThe link to the online earthquake catalogue of the IISEE is currently unavailable and has been marked as a deadlink. I am very hopeful that it will reappear soon as none of the institute's urls are currently working - I suspect a temporary problem, but I will check later. Mikenorton (talk) 16:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's now working again with some slight changes to the home page, so I removed the tag. Mikenorton (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Magnitude Estimates
editThe high end of the published estimates (9.1-9.3) is from what looks like a conference poster by Ishikawa. Reading some relatively recent work on the tsunami models for this event (Furumura et al., 2012, I can agree that the generally accepted Mw 8.7 estimate (and the Mw 8.4 in the NGDC significant earthquake database) seems low for such a long rupture area. Has anyone found a peer-reviewed article that supports a higher magnitude? Elriana (talk) 14:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well that took a few years, I'm not sure why I didn't spot it before. After a lot of searching around, I agree that the higher magnitude figure from Ishikawa has not been repeated in any peer-reviewed literature, so I've removed it. Mikenorton (talk) 16:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1707 Hōei earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0001xgp.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722072314/https://www.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dat/nenpo/no48/48c0/a48c0p13.pdf to http://www.dpri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dat/nenpo/no48/48c0/a48c0p13.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1707 Hōei earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110312174548/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0001xgp.php to http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usc0001xgp.php
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.gsj.jp/GDB/openfile/files/no0484/PDF/06_Ando/Ando_ppt.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225235238/http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200005/000020000500A0102130.php to http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200005/000020000500A0102130.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)