Talk:1789

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:29, 7 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

Removed text:

* March 18 - At the Old Bailey in London, Christian Bowman (alis Murphy) becomes the last woman to be burned to death (legally) in England. Her crime was counterfeiting silver coins.

Added by an anon in a spree of edits which all look like being reverted or deleted. Replace iff verified. Andrewa 22:37, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The information is, in part, born out in this link, in fact: [1]

Sep. 24 Judiciary Act

I've changed this description, because the Judiciary Act of 1789 did NOT establish the Supreme Court - the Constitution did. The Act established the lower federal courts and the number of Supreme Court Justices, but not the office.

Images

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

[See: Talk:1780#Images. -Wikid77 01:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)]Reply

'French Revolution the beginning of the modern era'?

The current article states that the French Revolution 'is often considered the beginning of the modern era.' This gives considerable weight both to violence and to a questionable, tendentious opinion, for, when one examines even just the year under discussion, it becomes clear that said bloody episode was but part of a whole era of global transformation, much of which precedes it in time if not in bloodshed. Also, I'm not sure that the sentence in question is grammatical, even if it were correct: shouldn't it be 'which,' not 'what'? (=> French person's English?).

FRENCH REVOLUTION MENCION JUST REMOVED

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WE CANT PUT A NOTE IN THE BEGINNING OF EVERY YEAR THAT HAD A NOTABLE HISTORIC EVENT. IF WE DID SO WE WOULD HAVE TO ADD A NOTE IN 1939,BECAUSE OF THE BEGGINING OF WWII. OR 1776 FOR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.5.80.126 (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic