Talk:17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings
Latest comment: 13 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | A news item involving 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 August 2010. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response
editWould a section on the government/international response be justified which may help back up notability of these bombings compared to many others. Two would be:
- UN strongly condemns the attack [1]
- "Obama condemns Iraq attacks, won't alter U.S. withdrawal plans" [2]
Just a thought, i dont know if anyone wants to add it. Thanks BritishWatcher (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Stub or Start?
editPer User:Adamdaley's peer review, questioning whether the article is a stub or start I am starting this discussion. IMO, I think the article is Start class.--NortyNort (Holla) 02:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback User:NortyNort. Adamdaley (talk) 08:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hwK_CSpBxsNuVUEaDuOwmSSCiqGwD9HN7EDO3
- In 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings on 2011-05-25 01:59:56, 410 Gone
- In 17 August 2010 Baghdad bombings on 2011-06-01 22:06:45, 410 Gone