Talk:17th Attack Squadron
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic References
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 17th Attack Squadron article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References
editWhere are the references throughout the article? Could you point the out for me please? Adamdaley (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- In the section called references! If you are asking about inline references, that is totally different. If that is the case, the {{no footnotes}} template may be what you are looking for. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Where are the inline citations? That is what I'm also saying "no" too in the "B class" assessment. Adamdaley (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- No one is claiming that there are inline citations. However the article does have references. Why do you want two tags asking for inline citations? You could help more by adding a few inline citations rather then discussing the meaning of inline citations. For the record, this article does not meet my criteria for C class based on the condition of references. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do not have access to those materials for the article. Therefore, you could maybe do it? I have alot of things to do than explain myself while I'm trying to point out potential mistakes in the article which could become a better article instead of complaining to a Coordinator that he's making mistakes. It seems like you know more about the article than I do. Adamdaley (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- And I don't have access either except for the ones that are online and so do you. If there are mistakes in the article, then you should correct them and add the correct reference to show that the new material is correct. I sense that you are saying since the article lacks inline references it also has mistakes since you can not easily verify them. Is there a requirement anywhere that supports that position? Vegaswikian (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- In the "B class", in the WikiProject Military History. B1 says "Referencing and citations", that is what I said "no" too. Since there were no citations in the artcile from the listed References. Time to move on. 22:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- And I don't have access either except for the ones that are online and so do you. If there are mistakes in the article, then you should correct them and add the correct reference to show that the new material is correct. I sense that you are saying since the article lacks inline references it also has mistakes since you can not easily verify them. Is there a requirement anywhere that supports that position? Vegaswikian (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I do not have access to those materials for the article. Therefore, you could maybe do it? I have alot of things to do than explain myself while I'm trying to point out potential mistakes in the article which could become a better article instead of complaining to a Coordinator that he's making mistakes. It seems like you know more about the article than I do. Adamdaley (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- No one is claiming that there are inline citations. However the article does have references. Why do you want two tags asking for inline citations? You could help more by adding a few inline citations rather then discussing the meaning of inline citations. For the record, this article does not meet my criteria for C class based on the condition of references. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Where are the inline citations? That is what I'm also saying "no" too in the "B class" assessment. Adamdaley (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)