Talk:1836 in rail transport

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JeffGBot in topic Dead link

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was consensus is against move. JPG-GR (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

1836 in rail transport → Rail transport in 1836 — completing incomplete request —Andrewa (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

From WP:RM:

1836 in rail transportRail transport in 1836 - The orig. title is not standard english syntax. I doubt anyone will search for an article in that manner. This will boost the article's visibility.Matthew Glennon (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply