Talk:1869 in paleontology

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taxa named in Seeley (1869)

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Seeley (1869, xv) remarks that his taxa "are only intended for the convenience of students using the museum, and not necessarily to take ranks as names of described species", meaning that the taxa erected in his 1869 catalog, even though many are specified by type specimens, don't count as valid names under the current edition of the ICZN code. Interestingly, Seeley (1892) mentions the name Stereosaurus in his discussion of plesiosaur anatomy, while Gigantosaurus Seeley, 1869 is listed as a nomen manuscription in Blake (1875), suggesting that Seeley was working on a paper to describe Gigantosaurus as a new genus and species but never published it, and that he may have been planning to publish a manuscript describing Stereosaurus (which never happened). For its part, Cryptosaurus wasn't officially described as a new genus and species until Seeley (1875). As result of these technical circumstances, Stereosaurus was originally classified as plesiosaurian, but has gone unnoticed since Seeley (1869).

H.G. Seeley, 1869, Index to the Fossil Remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia from the Secondary System of Strata, arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge. III, Cambridge University Press

Seeley, H. G. (1875). "On the Femur of Cryptosaurus eumerus, Seeley, a Dinosaur from the Oxford Clay of Great Grandshen". Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 31: 149–151.

Blake, J. F. 1875. On the Kimmeridge Clay of England. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 31, 196-233.

H. G. Seeley. 1892. The Nature of the Shoulder Girdle and Clavicular Arch in Sauropterygia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 51:119-151 68.4.61.168 (talk) 01:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Vahe DemirjianReply

Add topic